EEG-based Neurofeedback for Auditory Verbal Hallucinations (HALFEED) (HALFEED)

March 25, 2022 updated by: Simon McCarthy-Jones, University of Dublin, Trinity College

A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Low-resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) Neurofeedback Training for Treatment-resistant Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Schizophrenia

This study's primary objective is to perform a randomized controlled pilot study to assess the feasibility of using EEG-based neurofeedback to reduce the severity of treatment-resistant auditory verbal hallucinations ('hearing voices') in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Patients will be randomized to receive either EEG-based neurofeedback or treatment-as-usual.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) are experienced by up to 80% of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, where they can cause significant occupational and social impairment. Current treatments are incompletely effective. Around 25-30% of AVH are refractory to antipsychotic drugs, and cognitive behavioural therapy only shows a small-medium effect size. Initially promising studies of neurostimulation have shown smaller effect sizes as better controlled trials have been conducted. There is hence the need for innovative new treatments. One potential option is neurofeedback training. The primary objective of study is to perform a randomized, controlled, rater-blinded pilot trial (n=40) of EEG neurofeedback for AVH in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, to assess trial process, which will then inform a future definitive trial. The secondary objective is to calculate a 95% confidence interval that will allow interpretation of statistical difference between neurofeedback and treatment-as-usual groups to assess neurofeedback for reducing auditory verbal hallucinations. Participants will be randomly allocated to either a neurofeedback (plus treatment-as-usual) or treatment-as-usual alone condition. Neurofeedback will employ Z-score based LORETA (Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography). After a baseline assessment, twenty sessions of personalized neurofeedback training will be delivered over a period of approximately four months. This is the first registered trial of EEG neurofeedback for hallucinations. The primary focus of the pilot trial is on feasibility. However, a 95% confidence interval will be determined for the difference on PSYRATS-AH and AHRS scores between neurofeedback and treatment-as-usual to help inform a future definitive trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
4

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Ireland
      • Dublin, Ireland
        • Tallaght University Hospital / St. James' Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Are ≥ 18 years old
  • Have a clinical diagnosis of a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder
  • Have been experiencing auditory verbal hallucinations for at least one year
  • Score 2 or more on the frequency item of the auditory hallucinations subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH; Haddock et al., 1999) at time of initial assessment (representing voices occurring at least once a day)
  • Are deemed refractory to antipsychotic treatment (defined as still hearing voices despite 4-6 weeks of treatment with two different antipsychotics)
  • Have been on a stable dose of antipsychotic medication for the three months prior to study enrolment
  • Are right-handed, as determined by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (Oldfield, 1971)
  • Are able to provide written, informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a diagnosed substance abuse disorder
  • Prior head injury with loss of consciousness for more than five minutes
  • At immediate risk of harm to self or others.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: LORETA
In the first session, Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) will be used in combination with Z-scores to identify participants' resting state EEG differences relative to a database of norms of their demographic. EEG abnormalities which are consistent with the research literature on neural changes associated with AVH will then be targeted for normalization using neurofeedback training using LORETA in combination with Z-scores.
Other: LORETA
Twenty sessions of neurofeedback training using LORETA in combination with z-scores.
Other: Treatment as usual
Treatment-as-usual
Other: Treatment as usual
Maintenance use of an atypical antipsychotic (e.g., clozapine) with support, when needed, of a community nurse.
Other: Treatment as usual
Treatment-as-usual

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: 24 months
We will measure how many patients were recruited into the trial per calendar month of active recruitment.
24 months
Willingness of participants to be randomised.
Time Frame: 24 months
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered in the trial but refused randomisation.
24 months
Willingness of participants to complete assessments
Time Frame: 24 months
We will measure the proportion of participants who were entered into the trial and completed all baseline assessment measures.
24 months
Drop-out rate: LORETA condition
Time Frame: 24 months
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered into the trial, randomised to the neurofeedback condition, and dropped out of the study.
24 months
Success of blinding of raters
Time Frame: 24 months
We will measure the proportion of blind raters who were correctly able to guess the group allocation of participants, and assess if this was greater than chance.
24 months
Rates of adverse psychiatric events
Time Frame: 24 months
We will assess the proportion of patients entered into the trial who experienced adverse psychiatric events reported.
24 months
Drop-out rate: Controls
Time Frame: 24 months
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered into the trial, randomised to the control condition, and dropped out of the study.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Auditory Hallucination Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH)
Time Frame: End of intervention (~4 months)
The Auditory Hallucination Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH; Haddock et al., 1999) is an 11-item measure of the severity of auditory verbal hallucinations. Total scores can range from 0 to 44 with higher scores indicating greater severity of auditory verbal hallucinations. The PSYRATS-AH has been found to have a four-factor structure (Woodward et al., 2014). These are Emotion (range 0-20), Physical (range 0-12), Cognitive (range 0-8) and Loudness (range 0-4). Higher scores on each of these subscales represents more severe auditory verbal hallucinations. We will assess between group differences in both the total and four factor scores of the PSYRATS-AH at end of therapy.
End of intervention (~4 months)
Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS)
Time Frame: End of intervention (~4 months)
The Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS; Hoffman et al., 2003) is a seven-item structured clinical interview, which assesses the severity of auditory verbal hallucinations in the past week. Its items assess frequency, reality, loudness, number, length, attentional salience (how demanding of attention the voice is) and distress level. Items are rated on unique scales. Total scores on this measure can range from 0 - 41 . Higher scores represent more severe auditory verbal hallucinations.
End of intervention (~4 months)
Delusions Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings (PSYRATS-D).
Time Frame: End of intervention (~4 months)
Delusions will be assessed by the Delusions Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-D; Haddock et al., 1999). This is a 6-item structured clinical interview. Total scores can range from 0-24, with higher scores representing more severe delusions. It has been found to have two factors (Woodward et al., 2014), namely Distress (distress amount, distress intensity) and Frequency (preoccupation amount, preoccupation duration, conviction, disruption). Total scores on these factors can range from 0-8 and 0-16 respectively, with higher scores representing more severe delusions. Both total PSYRATS-D and factor scores will be employed.
End of intervention (~4 months)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Time Frame: End of intervention (~4 months)
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS; Zigmund & Snaith, 1983) is a 16-item self-report measure of both anxiety and depression. Eight items assess depression and eight items assess anxiety. Depression scores can range from 0-24 with higher scores representing higher levels of depression. Anxiety scores can range from 0-24 with higher scores representing higher levels of anxiety.
End of intervention (~4 months)
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: End of intervention (~4 months)
Quality of life will be assessed by the short-form of the self-report Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ; Endicott et al., 1993). Total scores on 16-item measure can range from 14 to 70, with higher scores representing greater quality of life.
End of intervention (~4 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Dublin, Trinity College

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Actualise

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Simon McCarthy-Jones, University of Dublin, Trinity College

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 25, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 206789
  • 25911 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Brain & Behavior Research Foundation)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings