Protective Effects of RIC in Elderly With Acute Ischemic Stroke Complicating Acute Coronary Syndrome (RIC-ACS)

November 24, 2022 updated by: Ji Xunming,MD,PhD, Capital Medical University

Protective Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Elderly With Acute Ischemic Stroke Complicating Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Single-center Randomised Controlled Trial

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a noninvasive strategy in which one or more cycles of brief and transient limb ischemia confers protection against prolonged and severe ischemia in distant organs.This study aimed to investigate whether RIC is safe and effective in patients with AIS complicating ACS

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a noninvasive strategy in which one or more cycles of brief and transient limb ischemia confers protection against prolonged and severe ischemia in distant organs (e.g., brain and heart).It has been demonstrated to be an effective strategy to reduce plasma myocardial enzyme, infarct volume, and incidence of post-ACS heart failure in patients with ACS. Additionally, recent studies have found that RIC was safe and feasible in patients with AIS even in those caused by large artery occlusion and treated with reperfusion therapy, and it might benefit AIS patients by reducing the risk of brain tissue infarction and improving functional outcomes. To date, however, it is still unknow whether RIC, a systematic protective strategy, could benefit patients with AIS complicating ACS.This study aimed to investigate whether RIC is safe and effective in patients with AIS complicating ACS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100053
        • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age≥60yo
  • AIS within 24 hours after symptom onset which meet the diagnostic criteria for acute ischemic stroke of the 2013th ASA guidelines, AIS was defined as a clinical episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal cerebral infarction that can be detected on imaging(e.g.,computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of head)
  • ACS within 24 hours of stroke onset , and ACS contains ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, unstable angina and it was defined when there is a rise and/or fall of plasma cardiac biomarkers (e.g., myocardial enzyme，cardiac troponin I), along with supportive evidence in the form of typical symptoms (e.g., chest pain), suggestive electrocardiographic changes, or imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality
  • The patients missed the opportunity of or contradicted to reperfusion therapy (i.e., intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular treatments) for both AIS and ACS.
  • Informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable vital signs
  • Prior ipsilateral stroke with residual deficits
  • AIS caused by cardioembolism, suspicious arterial dissection, intracranial sinus thrombolysis, vasculitis, and moyamoya disease.
  • Intracranial bleeding.
  • Advanced malignancy.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure ≥200 mm Hg despite medications at enrollment).
  • Any vascular, soft tissue, or orthopedic injury (eg, superficial wounds and fractures of the arm) that contraindicated bilateral arm ischemic preconditioning.
  • Peripheral vascular disease that affecting the upper limbs' arteries
  • Any disorder that could potentially increase pre-stroke myocardial enzyme concentrations (eg, percutaneous coronary intervention or myocardial infarction within the previous 6 weeks)
  • Coronary artery stenosis requiring coronary bypass surgery for the index event within 3 months; or severe heart failure requiring mechanical ventilation or use of an intra-aortic balloon pump
  • Taking drugs in the study period or are participating in other clinical trials.
  • Severe psychiatric disease.
  • Patients who cannot keep treatment or follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: RIC group
Patients with AIS complicating ACS who were eligible for this study received standardized medical treatment and secondary prevention, including antiplatelets, low molecular weight heparin for anticoagulation，statins for lipid-lowering and stabilizing plaque, nitrates for vascular expansion and cardiocerebrovascular risk factors management. Administration of antihypertensive, antidiabetic or other agents were elective at the discretion of the treating physician according to the conditions of the patients. In addition, patients underwent RIC twice daily for 14 days.And the RIC procedure during which bilateral arm cuffs are inflated to a pressure of 200mmHg for five cycles of 5 min followed by 5 min of relaxation of the cuffs.
Device: RIC
The RIC procedure during which bilateral arm cuffs are inflated to a pressure of 200mmHg for five cycles of 5 min followed by 5 min of relaxation of the cuffs.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: sham-RIC group
Patients with AIS complicating ACS who were eligible for this study received standardized medical treatment and secondary prevention, including antiplatelets, low molecular weight heparin for anticoagulation，statins for lipid-lowering and stabilizing plaque, nitrates for vascular expansion and cardiocerebrovascular risk factors management. Administration of antihypertensive, antidiabetic or other agents were elective at the discretion of the treating physician according to the conditions of the patients. In addition, patients underwent sham-RIC twice daily for 14 days.And the sham-RIC procedure during which bilateral arm cuffs are inflated to a pressure of 60mmHg for five cycles of 5 min followed by 5 min of relaxation of the cuffs.
Device: sham-RIC
The sham-RIC procedure during which bilateral arm cuffs are inflated to a pressure of 60mmHg for five cycles of 5 min followed by 5 min of relaxation of the cuffs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs)
Time Frame: from baseline to 3 months after therapy
MACCEs defined as all cause of death and recurrence of cardiac and cerebrovascular ischemic events within 3 months after randomization
from baseline to 3 months after therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the proportion of patients achieving functional independence
Time Frame: from baseline to 3 months after therapy
Functional independence is defined as modified Ranks scale [mRS] ≤2 points
from baseline to 3 months after therapy
the national institutes of health stroke (NIHSS) score
Time Frame: changes from baseline to 7 days, 14 days ,30 days, 90 days after therapy
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is considered as a standardized assessment of neurological functions in the acute phase of stroke, and it is generally used to quantify patient's neurological impairments on 15 items in 11 fields of different neurological status.The score of the scale ranges from 0 to 42.And higher score indicates worse neurological function.The NHISS will be assessed by certified study investigator, who is blinded to the treatment assignment.
changes from baseline to 7 days, 14 days ,30 days, 90 days after therapy
plasma hypersensitive C-reactive protein（hs-CRP） level
Time Frame: changes from baseline to 2 weeks after therapy
Blood samples were drawn from the cubital vein after enrolling into this study and two weeks after randomization. These samples were centrifuged immediately collection, and serum hs-CRP level were examined in fresh plasma samples.
changes from baseline to 2 weeks after therapy
global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) score
Time Frame: changes from baseline to 7 days, 14 days ,30 days, 90 days after therapy
For each patient, GRACE score was calculated by using specific variables collected at admission. Patients were classified into 3 categories low (1-108), intermediate (109-140), and high (>140), according to the GRACE score
changes from baseline to 7 days, 14 days ,30 days, 90 days after therapy
modified Rankin scale（mRs）
Time Frame: changes from baseline to 7 days, 14 days ,30 days, 90 days after therapy
this scale is to evaluate the neurological function，it ranges form 0 to 6, the lower score means better neurological outcome.
changes from baseline to 7 days, 14 days ,30 days, 90 days after therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Capital Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 10, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 8, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 6, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 24, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RIC-ACS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings