A Safety and Efficacy Study to Evaluate Rosacea

December 14, 2024 updated by: AiViva BioPharma, Inc.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Intradermally Administered AIV001 in Subjects With Papulopustular Rosacea

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic profile of ascending concentrations of the study medication compared with vehicle in subjects with rosacea.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is primarily a safety study to evaluate the safety of AIV001 when administered to subjects with rosacea. Exploratory efficacy measures will also be collected as well as pharmacokinetic profiles.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92121
        • Cosmetic Laser Dermatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy male and/or female subjects between the ages of 18 and 65 year with rosacea, 10 to 30 papules and pustules (at least 5 lesions within the treatment area on each facial side), and < 2 nodules
  • Presence of moderate to severe persistent erythema
  • Total body weight >45 kg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of any skin condition on the face that would interfere with the diagnosis or assessment of rosacea
  • Extremely dark skin type that would confound the digital analysis of erythema (eg, Fitzpatrick Skin Type 5 or 6)
  • Excessive facial hair (eg, beards, sideburns, moustaches, etc.), birthmarks, or tattoos that would interfere with diagnosis or assessment of rosacea
  • Use of tobacco- or nicotine-containing products in excess of the equivalent of 5 cigarettes per day.
  • Pregnant or nursing females; females of childbearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of non-hormonal contraception as outlined in this protocol from at least 14 days prior to start of treatment.
  • Hypersensitivity or allergy to axitinib or any other component of the study treatment
  • Use within 6 months prior to baseline and during the study of oral retinoids (eg, Accutane®) or therapeutic vitamin A supplements of greater than 10,000 units/day (multivitamins are allowed).
  • Use within 6 weeks prior to baseline and during the study of vasodilators or α-adrenergic receptor-blocking agents.
  • Use within 1 month prior to baseline and during the study of 1) topical retinoids to the face, 2) systemic antibiotics know to have an impact on the severity of facial rosacea (eg, containing tetracycline and its derivatives, erythromycin and its derivatives, sulfamethoxazole, or trimethoprim), 3) systemic corticosteroids, or 4) facial light-based therapies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Cohort 1 - vehicle
Subjects randomized to vehicle will receive vehicle administration to the target area.
Drug: Vehicle
intradermal injection
Active Comparator: Cohort 1 - 0.033%
Subjects randomized to vehicle will receive AIV001 0.033% administration to the target area.
Drug: AIV001
intradermal injection
Placebo Comparator: Cohort 2 - vehicle
Subjects randomized to vehicle will receive vehicle administration to the target area.
Drug: Vehicle
intradermal injection
Active Comparator: Cohort 2 - 0.1%
Subjects randomized to vehicle will receive AIV001 0.01% administration to the target area.
Drug: AIV001
intradermal injection
Placebo Comparator: Cohort 3 - vehicle
Subjects randomized to vehicle will receive vehicle administration to the target area.
Drug: Vehicle
intradermal injection
Active Comparator: Cohort 3 - 0.3%
Subjects randomized to vehicle will receive AIV001 0.03% administration to the target area.
Drug: AIV001
intradermal injection
Placebo Comparator: Cohort 4 - vehicle
Subjects randomized to vehicle will receive vehicle administration to the target area.
Drug: Vehicle
intradermal injection
Active Comparator: Cohort 4 - 1%
Subjects randomized to vehicle will receive AIV001 0.03% administration to the target area.
Drug: AIV001
intradermal injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Adverse Events
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 84
The occurrence of adverse events will be collected and reported using MedDRA to code. Description, start and end dates, and severity will be recorded.
Day 1 through Day 84

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy evaluated by the Investigator using the Investigator Global Assessment Scale
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 84
Evaluation of rosacea within the treatment area. 0 = clear (No papules and/or pustules; no or residual erythema; no or mild to moderate telangiectasia), 1 = minimal (Rare papules and/or pustules; residual to mild erythema; mild to moderate telangiectasia), 2 = mild (Few papules and/or pustules; mild erythema; mild to moderate telangiectasia), 3 = mild to moderate (Distinct number of papules and/or pustules; mild to moderate erythema; mild to moderate telangiectasia), 4 = moderate (Pronounced number of papules and/or pustules; moderate erythema; mild to moderate telangiectasia), 5 = moderate to severe (Many papules and/or pustules; occasionally with large inflamed lesions; moderate erythema; moderate degree of telangiectasia), and 6 = severe (Numerous papules and/or pustules, occasionally with confluent areas of inflamed lesions; moderate or severe erythema; moderate or severe telangiectasia). Scores of 0 or 1 are considered success.
Day 1 through Day 84
Efficacy evaluated by the Investigator by performing Inflammatory Lesion Counts
Time Frame: Day 1 through 84
The number of inflammatory lesions is a static measure of the number of papules or pustules present within the treatment area.
Day 1 through 84
Evaluation of Erythema and Topography using Standardized Photography
Time Frame: Day 1 through 84
Photographs using standardized equipment will be taken and uploaded onto the vendor's server. The vendor will then use proprietary software to measure the amount of redness and the topography of the lesions within the treatment area.
Day 1 through 84

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AiViva BioPharma, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mitchell Goldman, MD, West Dermatology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 14, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AIV001-R01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings