¡Yo no Estoy Loc@! Improving Treatment Engagement for Latinos Using an E-E Video

November 4, 2020 updated by: University of Nevada, Reno
The underutilization of behavioral health services for mood and anxiety disorders by Latinos is a public health concern warranting intervention development. Perceived stigma associated with the pursuit of behavioral health services disproportionately restricts mental healthcare in Latinos. The current study empirically tests an intervention aimed at improving perceptions of behavioral health services for mood and anxiety disorders, ultimately improving Latinos' mental health through access to treatment. The experimental intervention is based on the Entertainment-Education (E-E) model, a popular media campaign that incorporates health and educational messages in an entertaining, story-telling narrative. The E-E model incorporates characters who have characteristics, beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors that are similar to those of the targeted audience to maximize social validity. Using data gathered in focus groups with Latinos a 3-minute E-E video (in Spanish) that aims to reduce stigma towards mental illness and behavioral health services was developed. Sixty adult Latinos pursuing care at a Federally Qualified Health Center, who screen positive for anxiety and/or depression will be invited to participate in the study. Participants will be administered a structured demographic interview and measures that assess stigma and attitudes towards mental health and behavioral health services and then randomized to the E-E video or control (structured discussion about depression and anxiety) condition. Participants will then complete the study measures and be invited to attend a Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) group for depression or anxiety. Consumer satisfaction will also be evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
48

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Nevada
      • Reno, Nevada, United States, 89502
        • Community Health Alliance

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Spanish-speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Screen positive for suicidality or psychosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: E-E Video
Watch E-E video that incorporates health and educational messages
Behavioral: E-E Video
The E-E video was developed by the research team and chronicles the story of Ana who while enjoying coffee with two family members, shares her challenges with depression and her successful outcome with therapy. The video utilizes the genre of the telenovela which creates an entertaining environment where the audience is captivated by the content and absorbs the messages portrayed.
Active Comparator: Discussion
Structured discussion about depression and anxiety
Behavioral: Discussion
Structured psychoeducation and pamphlet about anxiety and depression.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in score on Generalized Anxiety Stigma Scale (GASS)
Time Frame: immediately before and immediately after intervention
The GASS is a twenty-item scale used to measure stigma associated with anxiety disorders and was developed by Griffiths et al, (2004). It consists of two subscales, which measure two different types of stigma: personal and perceived. Responses to each item are measured on a five-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (0) to strongly agree (4). Scores on each subscale can range from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate higher levels of stigma against generalized anxiety. A Spanish-language version of the measure is being tested for validity and reliability (Benuto & Gonzalez, In Progress).
immediately before and immediately after intervention
Change in score on Depression Stigma Scale (DSS)
Time Frame: immediately before and immediately after intervention
The DSS is an eighteen-item scale used to measure stigma associated with depression and was developed by Griffiths et al, (2004). It consists of two subscales, which measure two different types of stigma: personal and perceived. Responses to each item are measured on a five-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (0) to strongly agree (4).Scores on each subscale can range from 0 to 36. Higher scores indicate higher levels of stigma against depression. A Spanish-language version of the measure is being tested for validity and reliability (Benuto & Gonzalez, In Progress).
immediately before and immediately after intervention
Change in score on Attitudes Towards Seeking Professional Help Scale (ATSPH)
Time Frame: immediately before and immediately after intervention
The ATSPH is a 20-item item measure that is intended to reflect an individual's attitude toward professional behavioral health treatment. It is a modified version of the Attitudes Towards Seeking Professional Psychological Help Scale (Fisher & Turner, 1970). Responses to each item are measured on a four-point scale ranging from disagree (0) to agree (3). Items (including some that are reverse-scored) are summed; total scores can range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward seeking treatment. A Spanish-language version of the measure is being tested for validity and reliability among a sample of Spanish-speaking individuals (Benuto & Gonzalez, In Progress).
immediately before and immediately after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Nevada, Reno

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 27, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 27, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 4, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1228113-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings