Docetaxal & Cisplatin vs LDFRT + Docetaxal & Cisplatin in Locally Advanced NPC

March 24, 2019 updated by: King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center

Randomized Phase II Trial of Docetaxal and Cisplatin Versus Low-Dose Fractionated Radiation Plus Docetaxal and Cisplatin as Induction Therapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer

The central hypothesis is to test Low Dose Fraction Radiotherapy (LDFRT), as a potentiator of Docetaxel and Cisplatin efficacy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Nasopharyngeal cancer is the commonest cancer of the head and neck in Saudi Arabia and constitutes nearly a half (44%) of all head and neck cancers diagnosed annually according to the National Cancer Registry Data. Majority of our patients present with locally advance disease which adversely affect their treatment outcome. The treatment of this disease has evolved over the last several years and several Phase III trials have now shown that combined chemotherapy and radiation are significantly superior to treatment with radiation therapy alone. However, results for treatment of the Stage III and IV disease remains less than satisfactory with a 5-year survival of 60-70 %. Recent data in other head and neck cancer sites including nasopharyngeal cancer indicates that the use of chemotherapy in combination with radiation may improve the outcome of therapy primarily by a reduction in the rate of distant metastasis. Induction chemotherapy alone has, however, failed to show an improvement in survival compared to radiation therapy alone. The administration of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemo-radiation appears the most promising approach. Our experience at KFSH&RC with induction chemotherapy followed by chemo-radiation in Stage IV cancers, still reveals that approximately 25- 30% of patients will develop local relapse in the nasopharyngeal site; and 35- 40 % of patients are likely to develop distant metastasis. The most promising recent schedule of induction chemotherapy has been the use of Docetaxel and Cisplatin followed by concurrent Cisplatin and radiation. A recent Phase II study demonstrated that the three-year progression-free survival and overall survivals was improved with the use of this induction regimen. A variety of treatment strategies are currently being investigated in hope of achieving improved local control and enhanced survival of patients. These include addition of new chemotherapy drugs, other targeted agents such as Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, etc and radiation fractionation. The rationale for using neoadjuvant chemotherapy is that a reduction in the overall tumor burden will permit more effective local therapy and reduce the rates of distant metastases. Neoadjuvant cisplatin / docetaxel are active agents for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer. The addition of docetaxel to platinum containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in other locally advanced head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma have also been shown to improve survival.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
108

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. WHO II-III carcinoma of the nasopharynx, histologically proven.
  2. Locally advanced stage III and IV (minimal intracranial extension only) with absence of distant metastases.
  3. Age between 18 and 70 years.
  4. ECOG performance status 0-2.

  5. Hematological function parameters performed within 10 days before inclusion:

    • Neutrophils ≥ 1000 * 109/l.
    • Platelets: ≥ 100 * 109/l.
    • Hemoglobin: ≥ 9 g/dl

  6. Adequate hepatic function, defined as follows within 2 weeks prior to registration:

    • Total bilirubin is normal
    • AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) <= 2.5 * upper limit of normal (ULN) of each center.
    • Alkaline phosphatase <= 2.5 * ULN.
  7. Renal function parameters performed within 10 days before inclusion: normal serum creatinine and creatinine clearance must be ≥ 55 ml/min.
  8. Patient who has given his/her written consent before any specific procedure of the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who present stage I, IIa, IIb and IVc.
  2. Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease-free for a minimum of 3 years (e.g., carcinoma in situ of the breast, oral cavity, or cervix are all permissible);
  3. Prior systemic chemotherapy for the study cancer; note that prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is permitted;
  4. Prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields.
  5. Head and neck surgery of the primary tumor or lymph nodes prior to registration, with the exception of incisional or excisional biopsies.
  6. Patients receiving other experimental therapeutic cancer treatment;
  7. Blood pressure at baseline > 150/100 mmHg;
  8. Peripheral neuropathy CTCAE, v. 4.0 h grade 2

  9. Severe, active co-morbidity, defined as follows:

    • Major medical or psychiatric illness, which in the investigators' opinion would interfere with the completion of therapy and follow up or with full understanding of the risks and potential complications of the therapy.
    • Unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure or peripheral vascular disease requiring hospitalization within the last 12 months, or other cardiac compromise that in the judgment of the investigator will preclude the safe administration of a study drug.
    • Acquired Immune Deficiency.
    • Pregnancy or women of childbearing potential and men who are sexually active and not willing/able to use medically acceptable forms of contraception; this exclusion is necessary because the treatment involved in this study may be significantly teratogenic.
    • Prior allergic reaction to the study drug(s) involved in this.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: A: Chemo+RT low dose
Chemo + Low dose RT: Intervention will include chemotherapy using Docetaxel 75mg/m2 IV D1, Cisplatin (CDDP) 75mg/m2 IV D1 and radiation therapy (LDFRT) using 50 cGy of radiation per fraction BID on the day of chemotherapy and the day after during induction i.e. 50 cGy x 4 times per cycle given for a total of 2 cycles every 21 days.
Combination product: Chemo + Low dose RT
Intervention will include chemotherapy using Docetaxel 75mg/m2 IV D1, Cisplatin 75mg/m2 IV D1.Radiathion therapy (LDFRT) using 50 cGy of radiation per fraction BID on the day of chemotherapy and the day after during induction i.e. 50 cGy x 4 times per cycle given for total of 2 cycles every 21 days.
Other Names:
  • Chemotherapy, Low Dose Radiation Therapy
Drug: Chemo alone
Chemo alone: Intervention will include chemotherapy using Docetaxel 75mg/m2 IV D1 and Cisplatin (CDDP) 75mg/m2 IV D1 given for 2 cycles every 21 days.
Other Names:
  • Chemotherapy
Active Comparator: B: Chemo alone
Chemo alone: Intervention will include chemotherapy using Docetaxel 75mg/m2 IV D1 and Cisplatin (CDDP) 75mg/m2 IV D1 given for 2 cycles every 21 days.
Combination product: Chemo + Low dose RT
Intervention will include chemotherapy using Docetaxel 75mg/m2 IV D1, Cisplatin 75mg/m2 IV D1.Radiathion therapy (LDFRT) using 50 cGy of radiation per fraction BID on the day of chemotherapy and the day after during induction i.e. 50 cGy x 4 times per cycle given for total of 2 cycles every 21 days.
Other Names:
  • Chemotherapy, Low Dose Radiation Therapy
Drug: Chemo alone
Chemo alone: Intervention will include chemotherapy using Docetaxel 75mg/m2 IV D1 and Cisplatin (CDDP) 75mg/m2 IV D1 given for 2 cycles every 21 days.
Other Names:
  • Chemotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of chemo and radiation toxicities
Time Frame: Three years
Chemotherapy and acute radiation toxicities as evaluated using the revised NCI (CTCAE) Version 4.03
Three years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distant and loco regional failure
Time Frame: Three years
Distant and loco regional failure as evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
Three years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nasser Alrajhi, MD, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 24, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2121 063

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings