Comparison of Extra-short (4 mm) Implants Used as Distal Support of a Maxillary Full-arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis vs. 10 mm Implants Installed After Sinus Floor Elevation.
Comparison of Extra-short (4 mm) Implants Used as Distal Support of a Maxillary Full-arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis vs. 10 mm Implants Installed After Sinus Floor Elevation. A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Edentulous maxilla
- Willing to receive a full arch fixed restoration in the maxilla.
- Latest extraction at least 8 weeks before implant insertion
- Sinus floor height included between 4 to 6 mm
- Bone width in the distal segments sufficient to allow the insertion of a 4 mm long implant of standard diameter.
- In the anterior maxilla (from first premolar to first premolar) bone width sufficient to allow the insertion of 10 mm long implants of standard diameter. Minor horizontal augmentations with guided bone regeneration procedures was allowed in the anterior maxilla.
the opposing arch have to present one of the following conditions:
- natural dentition (at least 10 elements from 3.5 to 4.5)
- Fixed dental prosthesis of at least 10 elements (from 3.5 to 4.5) supported by teeth or implants
- Implant supported or teeth supported overdentures
- Adequate partial removable prostheses.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of conditions requiring prophylactic use of antibiotics (e.g., history of rheumatic heart disease, bacterial endocarditis, cardiac valvular anomalies, prosthetic joint replacements).
- Major systemic diseases, or medical conditions requiring prolonged use of steroids, or alcoholism or chronically drug abuse.
- Current pregnancy or breastfeeding women
- Smokers > 10 cigarettes per day
- Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene
- Immunocompromised patients including patients infected with HIV
- Conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the investigator, which would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance, or unreliability.
- Patients with an ongoing or previous treatment with bisphosphonates (for at least 2 months for oral therapy or 6 months for IV injection)
Local exclusion criteria
- Local inflammation, including untreated periodontitis
- Pre-cancerous oral lesions
- History of local irradiation therapy
- Severe bruxism or clenching habits
- Patients with inadequate oral hygiene or unmotivated for adequate oral home care
- Previous Guided bone regeneration or Guided tissue regeneration treatment at the implant site
- Total removable prosthesis in the lower arch
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Short Group
In each side of the posterior region of the maxilla, one tissue level implant, 4 mm long and 4.1 mm in diameter, will be installed
|
placement of an extra short implant in the posterior edentulous ridge
|
|
Experimental: Standard group
sinus floor elevation with will be performed using natural bovine bone graft as filler material and porcine dermis collagen membrane to cover the antrostomy.
After 4 months of healing, one bone level implant, 10 mm long and 4.1 mm in diameter, will be installed into each augmented sinus.
|
placement of standard implant in the posterior edentulous ridge after maxillary sinus augmentation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
survival rate of 4 mm implants used as distal support
Time Frame: 24 months
|
To compare the survival rates of 4 mm implants used as distal support of a maxillary full-arch fixed dental prosthesis with standard (10 mm) implants placed in association with a bilateral sinus floor augmentation procedure.
|
24 months
|
|
Crestal bone level
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Change of crestal bone level measured on intraoral x-ray applying a parallel technique from baseline (definitive prosthesis delivering) and 2-year follow-up.
The distance between the implant margin and the first bone to implant contact will be measured in millimeters at the mesial and distal aspects of the Short and Standard implants.
|
24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Technical complications
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Any technical complications related to implants, abutments, screw loosening, prosthetic fracture or chipping of the veneer material expressed in number of occurrence.
|
24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):216-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x.
- Cricchio G, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. Sinus bone formation and implant survival after sinus membrane elevation and implant placement: a 1- to 6-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Oct;22(10):1200-1212. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02096.x.
- Barone A, Ricci M, Grassi RF, Nannmark U, Quaranta A, Covani U. A 6-month histological analysis on maxillary sinus augmentation with and without use of collagen membranes over the osteotomy window: randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jan;24(1):1-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02340.x. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
- Masuda K, Silva ER, Botticelli D, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Xavier SP. Antrostomy Preparation for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Drills or a Sonic Instrument: A Microcomputed Tomography and Histomorphometric Study in Rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 July/August;34(4):819-827. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7350. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
- Lundgren S, Andersson S, Gualini F, Sennerby L. Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(3):165-73.
- Moon YS, Sohn DS, Moon JW, Lee JH, Park IS, Lee JK. Comparative histomorphometric analysis of maxillary sinus augmentation with absorbable collagen membrane and osteoinductive replaceable bony window in rabbits. Implant Dent. 2014 Feb;23(1):29-36. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000031.
- Omori Y, Ricardo Silva E, Botticelli D, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Lang NP, Xavier SP. Reposition of the bone plate over the antrostomy in maxillary sinus augmentation: A histomorphometric study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Aug;29(8):821-834. doi: 10.1111/clr.13292. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
- Corbella S, Taschieri S, Weinstein R, Del Fabbro M. Histomorphometric outcomes after lateral sinus floor elevation procedure: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Sep;27(9):1106-22. doi: 10.1111/clr.12702. Epub 2015 Oct 10.
- Caneva M, Lang NP, Garcia Rangel IJ, Ferreira S, Caneva M, De Santis E, Botticelli D. Sinus mucosa elevation using Bio-Oss(R) or Gingistat(R) collagen sponge: an experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jul;28(7):e21-e30. doi: 10.1111/clr.12850. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
- De Santis E, Lang NP, Ferreira S, Rangel Garcia I Jr, Caneva M, Botticelli D. Healing at implants installed concurrently to maxillary sinus floor elevation with Bio-Oss(R) or autologous bone grafts. A histo-morphometric study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 May;28(5):503-511. doi: 10.1111/clr.12825. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
- Riachi F, Naaman N, Tabarani C, Aboelsaad N, Aboushelib MN, Berberi A, Salameh Z. Influence of material properties on rate of resorption of two bone graft materials after sinus lift using radiographic assessment. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:737262. doi: 10.1155/2012/737262. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
- Shanbhag S, Shanbhag V, Stavropoulos A. Volume changes of maxillary sinus augmentations over time: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):881-92. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3472.
- Zijderveld SA, van den Bergh JP, Schulten EA, ten Bruggenkate CM. Anatomical and surgical findings and complications in 100 consecutive maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jul;66(7):1426-38. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.027.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- protocol #15052
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.