EUS-B-FNA in the Diagnosis of Malignant Parenchymal Lung Lesions

September 30, 2021 updated by: Michele Mondoni, University of Milan

Observational, Prospective, Multicenter Study on the Diagnostic Accuracy, Safety and Tolerability, Predictors of Success of EUS-B-FNA in the Diagnosis of Malignant Parenchymal Lung Lesions

The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, safety and tolerability, predictors of success of EUS-B-FNA in the diagnosis of malignant parenchymal lung lesions.

The Investigators will also evaluated the adequacy of samples obtained for molecular analysis in patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Lung cancer is by far the leading cause of cancer death among both men and women worldwide. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) represents about 80-90% of all lung cancers. Endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) is a safe and accurate technique that has been mostly described for the diagnosis and the mediastinal nodal staging of NSCLC, as a complementary technique to endobronchial ultrasound trans-bronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) or when EBUS-TBNA may be difficult and/or contraindicated for clinical reasons (e.g. excessive cough, respiratory failure etc).

Few retrospective studies evaluated the sensitivity and the safety of this technique in the diagnosis of parenchymal pulmonary lesions suspected for lung cancer, in contact or adjacent to the esophagus. Few data are available on the adequacy of the samples obtained by EUS-B-FNA for molecular analysis in NSCLC. The main predictors of success are still unclear.

The primary aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-B-FNA in the diagnosis of malignant parenchymal lung lesions. The Investigators will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of the technique, the main predictors of success and the adequacy of samples obtained for molecular analysis in patients with NSCLC

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
107

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Ancona, Italy
        • Pulmonology Unit, AOU "Ospedali Riuniti"; Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica delle Marche
      • Milan, Italy, 20142
        • Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano
      • Rome, Italy
        • Unità Operativa Complessa di Pneumologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
    • Venice
      • Mestre, Venice, Italy
        • UO Pneumologia dell'Ospedale dell'Angelo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with a parenchymal lung lesion suspected for malignancy in contact or adjacent to the esophagus at the CT scan, who need a pathological diagnosis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients with a lung parenchymal lesion suspected for malignancy, in contact or adjacent to the esophagus at the CT scan (with or without mediastinal lymph adenopathies), requiring a pathological diagnosis:

    • which can not be sample by bronchoscopy/EBUS-TBNA or
    • with a previous not diagnostic bronchoscopy/EBUS-TBNA or
    • with clinical/anesthesiological contraindications to bronchoscopy/EBUS-TBNA or
    • with a previous nodal EUS-B-FNA not diagnostic/not adequate at the ROSE
  • Patients with lung parenchymal lesions who are able to sign the informed consent for the study participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with lung parenchymal lesions of known etiology;
  • Patients with lung parenchymal lesions in whom bronchoscopic ultrasound-guided trans- esophageal needle aspiration is contraindicated;
  • Patients with lung parenchymal lesions who refuse/are not able to sign the informed consent for the study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients with suspected lung cancer
Patients with pulmonary parenchymal lesions suspected for malignancy in contact or adjacent to the esophagus which can be sampled by EUS-B-FNA
Procedure: EUS-B-FNA
Endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) is an endoscopic technique based on a trans-esophageal needle aspiration performed by an interventional pulmonologist with the echo-bronchoscope
Other Names:
  • Endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope fine needle aspiration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity of EUS-B-FNA in the detection of malignant pulmonary lesions
Time Frame: At study completion (expected February 2021)
Diagnostic accuracy (i.e., sensitivity and specificity) of EUS-B-FNA in the diagnosis of malignant pulmonary parenchymal lesions, discriminating those with a malignant disease in comparison with those without the malignant disease. A specific unit of measure is not included, being the computation of the present outcome based on the absolute number of malignant/non malignant cases to the total number of diagnosed individuals.
At study completion (expected February 2021)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absolute and relative frequency of adequate samples for molecular analysis in NSCLC following assessment by pathologist/molecular biologist
Time Frame: At study completion (expected February 2021)
Proportional number (percentage) of samples obtained with EUS-B-FNA containing sufficient material (i.e. malignant cells) for molecular analysis in NSCLC following assessment by a pathologist/molecular biologist. A specific unit of measure is not included, being the computation of the present outcome based on the absolute number of malignant cells in the single sample.
At study completion (expected February 2021)
Detection of predictors of successful aspirate based on the implementation of regression models
Time Frame: At study completion (expected February 2021)
Implementation of regression models (logistic regression analysis) to detect variables related to a successful aspirate: anatomical (i.e. lung, lobe of the lesion), endoscopic (type of endoscope, type of needle, number of needle passes, needle aspiration technique), pathological (presence/absence of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), health personnel performing ROSE (i.e pathologist, respiratory physician, cytotechnician), pathological technique used for diagnosis and molecular analysis (smear, cell-block, liquid based cytology). A specific unit of measure is not included, being the computation of the present variables based on the measurement of absolute numbers not recorded with a specific unit of measure. The unit of measure is basically identified by the single element of the variable.
At study completion (expected February 2021)
Safety (number of adverse events) of EUS-B-FNA through CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: Until 24 hours after the procedure
Incidence rate and qualitative and quantitative description of adverse events in patients undergoing EUS-B-FNA. A specific unit of measure is not included, being the computation of the present outcome based on the absolute number of the adverse events detected by the attending physician.
Until 24 hours after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Milan

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michele Mondoni, MD, Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 31, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EUS-B

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on EUS-B-FNA

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings