Analgesic Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Versus Placebo During the First Stage of Labor

June 17, 2019 updated by: Manuel José Sos Gallen, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana

Analgesic Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Versus Placebo During the First Stage of Labor. Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial

This study seeks to verify the analgesic efficacy of TENS during the first stage of labor applying TENS parameters that, according to with the evidence, can be effective for this application and discarding the placebo effect according to the methodological recommendations.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

TENS is a non-pharmacological alternative for pain control during labor. Although it's a method that has been used for decades, there is not enough evidence on its efficacy, so it's considered ineffective in the Spanish and British guidelines of clinical practice. The present study seeks to verify the analgesic efficacy of TENS by applying the electrodes in the spinal nerve roots associated with labor pain and using conventional TENS with parameters that, according to the evidence, may be effective for this application.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
46

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Manuel José Sos Gallén, PT, PGCert
  • Phone Number: +34610736702
  • Email: sos@pipeline.es

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Castellón
      • Castellón De La Plana, Castellón, Spain, 12004
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital General Universitario de Castellon
        • Contact:
          • Manuel José Sos Gallén
          • Phone Number: +34610736702
          • Email: sos@pipeline.es
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Cesar Romeo Cabrera León, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Manuel José Sos Gallén, PT, PGCert

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Women attending routinary fetal monitoring before labor

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiparous
  • Scheduled cesarean
  • Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker
  • Epilepsy
  • Fetal malformation
  • Language barrier

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention
TENS application using the TensMed S82 (Enraf Nonius). Current parameters: balanced symmetric biphasic square waveform, continuous stimulation, frequency 80 Hz, pulse duration modulated between 250 and 290 μs, modulation time 5 seconds. Self-adhesive electrodes of 50 x 90 mm applied paravertebrally to 2 cm. of the spinous apophysis. Use of two channels with independent intensity (mA): electrodes of the first channel applied at level T10-L1 and second channel ones at level S2-S4. Maximum intensity without reaching pain, increasing the intensity throughout the application to maintain this level. Start of the intervention when the woman expresses pain. End of the intervention when neuraxial anesthesia is applied (if the woman demands it) or after delivery.
Device: TENS
TENS application using the TensMed S82 (Enraf Nonius). Current parameters: balanced symmetric biphasic square waveform, continuous stimulation, frequency 80 Hz, pulse duration modulated between 250 and 290 μs, modulation time 5 seconds. Self-adhesive electrodes of 50 x 90 mm applied paravertebrally to 2 cm. of the spinous apophysis. Use of two channels with independent intensity (mA): electrodes of the first channel applied at level T10-L1 and second channel ones at level S2-S4. Maximum intensity without reaching pain, increasing the intensity throughout the application to maintain this level. Start of the intervention when the woman expresses pain. End of the intervention when neuraxial anesthesia is applied (if the woman demands it) or after delivery.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Same application as Intervention, but using 0,1 mA as fixed intensity on both channels.
Device: TENS Placebo
Same application as Intervention, but using 0,1 mA as fixed intensity on both channels.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity measure
Time Frame: Start of intervention, each 30 minutes during intervention, end of intervention (when neuraxial anesthesia is applied -if the woman demands it- or after delivery, assessed up to 10 hours from intervention's start).
Self reported pain intensity. Score 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as can be), using a 0-10 pain scale combined with colored faces pain scale, for measuring the change of pain.
Start of intervention, each 30 minutes during intervention, end of intervention (when neuraxial anesthesia is applied -if the woman demands it- or after delivery, assessed up to 10 hours from intervention's start).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TENS satisfaction
Time Frame: At leaving the labor room, assessed up to 3 hours after delivery.
Self reported interest on use of TENS on future deliveries. Score 0-10 (0 = no way, 10 = absolutely necessary)
At leaving the labor room, assessed up to 3 hours after delivery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Hospital General Universitario de Castellón

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Manuel José Sos Gallén, PT, PGCert, Cardenal Herrera University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 11, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SOS1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labor Pain

Clinical Trials on TENS

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings