Human-Animal Interaction to Promote Recovery Following Pediatric Brain Injury (AAT)

June 14, 2024 updated by: Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Huma-Animal Interaction to Promote Recovery Following Pediatric Brain Injury

This study evaluates the addition of therapy dogs in inpatient physical and occupational therapy. Data will be collected across 10 PT and 10 OT sessions, half of which will incorporate a therapy dog.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Children with acquired brain injuries (ABI) treated on an inpatient rehabilitation unit are at significant risk for long term functional impairment, highlighting the importance of maximizing the effectiveness and utilization of inpatient rehabilitation therapies. The proposed study seeks to explore the value of animal-assisted therapy (AAT) during inpatient rehabilitation following pediatric ABI. Investigators will employ a within subjects cross-over trial; all participants will have a volunteer dog involved in 50% of their physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) sessions over a 2-week study period. AAT will consist of integration of a dog from the hospital volunteer dog program in PT and OT sessions, while the non-AAT condition will be treatment as usual (TAU) as identified by the patients' treatment team. Information regarding patient engagement/participation in therapy, affect, and physiological variables will be collected during each session. Session notes will also be coded for additional qualitative information. Qualitative feedback from patients and families, therapists, medical teams, and dog handlers will also be collected throughout the project to examine feasibility and satisfaction with the intervention as well as potential barriers and areas for improvement. Investigators will 1) examine the effect of AAT on level of patient participation and patient affect during PT and OT sessions, 2) Explore the effect of AAT on functional outcomes using a historic cohort comparison group, and 3) explore the physiological response of patients, and examine a number of variables (injury type/severity, child sex and anthropomorphism, therapist factors, and dog handler factors) to begin to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from AAT during inpatient rehabilitation for ABI.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
4

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis: Participants must be on the inpatient rehabilitation unit for treatment of an acquired brain injury (TBI, brain tumor, infection, stroke, etc)
  • Consent: The family must provide informed consent by parents or legal guardians
  • Assent: The adolescent must provide a signature indicating assent to participate in the study.
  • Age at time of screening: 6 years old and older with no upper limit
  • Responsiveness: Rancho score greater than 2 (or equivalent) at the time of enrollment (as noted in medical chart)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Animals: Participant has a significant allergy to dogs or have a significant fear of dogs.
  • Disease: Participant has a communicable disease that may pose a risk to dog or dog handler or a compromised immune system where interacting with dog and/or handler would be of significant risk to patient.
  • Responsiveness: Rancho score of 2 (or equivalent) or less
  • Cognitive issues: Participants with pre-injury/pre-diagnosis of developmental delay, autism, and/or patients who are non-verbal will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Animal Assisted Therapy - Dog Session
Therapy dog added to PT and OT session
Other: AAT - Dog
therapy dog added to inpatient PT and OT session
Active Comparator: Treatment as usual - No Dog session
No dog added to PT and OT session - PT and OT session as usual standard of care
Other: TAU - No Dog
PT and OT as usual without the addition of therapy dog

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Participation - AAT
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Patient participation during AAT sessions will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale (PRPS)The PRPS is a 6-item Likert-type, clinician-rated measure that quantifies observed patient participation in their therapy session. Therapists report their observations regarding patient's completion of exercises, effort applied to exercises, and level of support needed to complete activities. Scores range from 1 (None) to 6 (excellent). Therapists will complete this measure at the end of each AAT session. Ratings across the 5 (on average) AAT sessions will be used to create an patient participation - AAT score.
Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Patient Participation - TAU
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Patient participation during TAU sessions will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale (PRPS)The PRPS is a 6-item Likert-type, clinician-rated measure that quantifies observed patient participation in their therapy session. Therapists report their observations regarding patient's completion of exercises, effort applied to exercises, and level of support needed to complete activities. Scores range from 1 (None) to 6 (excellent). Therapists will complete this measure at the end of each TAU session. Scores across the 5 (on average) TAU sessions will be used to create a single patient participation - TAU score.
Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Objective session participation - AAT
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Objective session participation will be assessed via videotaped sessions for at least 2 AAT sessions. Coders will provide an objective measure of participation by rating patient in session participation using the Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale (PRPS). Coders will score participation using the PRPS and rate the participants level of participation from 1 (None) to 6 (Excellent). These coder ratings will be used to create an overall objective session participation AAT score.
Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Objective session participation - TAU
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Objective session participation will be assessed via videotaped sessions for at least 2 TAU sessions. Coders will provide an objective measure of participation by rating patient in session participation using the Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale (PRPS). Coders will score participation using the PRPS and rate the participants level of participation from 1 (None) to 6 (Excellent). These coder ratings will be used to create an overall objective session participation TAU score.
Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Patient Affect - AAT
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Patient affect will be assessed via the Symptom Inventory Scale - Short.This measure is a 4-item measure, where the patient reports the degree (from 0-10) they are experiencing each feeling/condition presented (Happy, fatigue, distraction, irritability). The patient will be asked to complete this measure at the beginning and end of each AAT session. These ratings will be used to create happy, fatigue, distracted, and irritable - AAT scores. Greater scores are reflective of greater levels of that emotion.
Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Patient Affect - TAU
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Patient affect will be assessed via the Symptom Inventory Scale - Short.This measure is a 4-item measure, where the patient reports the degree (from 0-10) they are experiencing each feeling/condition presented (Happy, fatigue, distraction, irritability). The patient will be asked to complete this measure at the beginning and end of each TAU session. These ratings will be used to create happy, fatigue, distracted, and irritable - TAU scores. Greater scores are indicative of greater levels of that emotion.
Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Objective mood assessment - AAT
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Objective mood assessment will be completed for at least 2 AAT sessions via coding of video taped sessions. Coders naïve to hypotheses will assess the percentage of time the patient displays positive and negative affect. Greater scores. Greater scores are indicative of greater levels of positive and negative affect. Scores across all coded AAT sessions will be used to create a positive affect-AAT score and negative affect-AAT score.
Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Objective mood assessment - TAU
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Objective mood assessment will be completed for at least 2 TAU sessions via coding of video taped sessions. Coders naïve to hypotheses will assess the percentage of time the patient displays positive and negative affect. Greater scores. Greater scores are indicative of greater levels of positive and negative affect. Scores across all coded TAU sessions will be used to create a positive affect-TAU score and negative affect-TAU score.
Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate- AAT
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Heart rate will be collected using an Empatica E4 wristband during each of the AAT sessions. The patient will wear the wrist band during all sessions, and data collected during AAT sessions will be summarized as heart rate - AAT,
Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Temperature - AAT
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Temperature will be collected using an Empatica E4 wristband during each of the AAT sessions. The patient will wear the wrist band during all sessions, and data collected during AAT sessions will be summarized as temperature-AAT.
Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Galvanic Skin Response - AAT
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Galvanic skin response (GSR) will be collected using an Empatica E4 wristband during each of the AAT sessions. The patient will wear the wrist band during all sessions, and data collected during AAT sessions will be summarized as GSR-AAT.
Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Heart Rate - Tau
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Heart rate will be collected using an Empatica E4 wristband during each of the TAU sessions. The patient will wear the wrist band during all sessions, and data collected during TAU sessions will be summarized as heart rate - TAU.
Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Temperature - Tau
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Temperature, and galvanic skin response will be collected using an Empatica E4 wristband during each of the TAU sessions. The patient will wear the wrist band during all sessions, and data collected during TAU sessions will be summarized as temperature-TAU.
Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Galvanic skin response - Tau
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Galvanic skin response (GSR) will be collected using an Empatica E4 wristband during each of the TAU sessions. The patient will wear the wrist band during all sessions, and data collected during TAU sessions will be summarized as GSR-TAU.
Throughout study completion, an average of 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Megan Narad, PhD, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 6, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 14, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CIN001-AAT
  • 1R21HD095132-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings