Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation (tAN) for Symptoms of Opioid Withdrawal

August 17, 2021 updated by: Spark Biomedical, Inc.

Delivering Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation (tAN) to Improve Symptoms Associated With Opioid Withdrawal

Clinical performance data for transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN) as a method to aid in the reduction of symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal in order to support clinical substantial equivalence to a predicate device.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Prior evidence has demonstrated that non-invasive neurostimulation can modulate specific brains regions associated with opioid use disorder and reduce opioid withdrawal symptoms. This is a double blind, randomized, controlled, multi-center study in which subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups: 1) active transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN) or 2) delayed-active tAN to determine reduction of symptoms related to opioid withdrawal. Subjects in the active tAN group will receive tAN immediately whereas those in the delayed-active tAN will have their therapy turned on after a 30 minute delay (inactive period). All subjects will be informed of their group assignment at the conclusion of the randomized, double blind period (following initial 30 minutes of active or inactive therapy) and all will continue to receive active tAN throughout the five-day study. Each clinical site will have pre-determined and qualified clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) accessor(s) that will be blind to the subjects group designation during the randomized, double blind period and will not be informed that all subjects receive active therapy throughout the remainder of the study. This will ensure a non-biased assessment of the COWS score and maintain single blinding throughout the duration of the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
35

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78745
        • Recovery Unplugged

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Current opioid dependence; prescriptive or non-prescriptive
  2. COWS score is ≥ 13 or in the opinion of the investigator the subject is in moderate to severe withdrawal
  3. 18-65 years of age
  4. English Proficiency
  5. Participants must be able to provide informed con-sent and function at an intellectual level sufficient for study requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current evidence of an uncontrolled and/or clinically significant medical condition
  2. History of seizures or epilepsy
  3. History of neurological diseases or traumatic brain injury
  4. Participants using long-acting opioids such as methadone or buprenorphine for a period of five or more consecutive days prior to enrollment
  5. Recent suicide attempt leading to current hospital admission or continued expressed suicidal ideation
  6. Presence of devices, e.g. pace-makers, cochlear prosthesis, neuro-stimulators
  7. Abnormal ear anatomy or ear infection present
  8. Women of childbearing potential, not using adequate contraception as per investigator judgment or not willing to comply with contraception for the duration of the study
  9. Females who are pregnant or lactating
  10. Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Sham Comparator: delayed-active tAN
Device: transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN)
Phoenix tAN system
Experimental: active tAN
Device: transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN)
Phoenix tAN system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) score
Time Frame: 60 minutes
Mean percent change in clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) score from baseline to 60 minutes after start of active tAN therapy. The COWS is an 11-item scale with a score range between 0 and 48. Total score is the sum of all the items and a higher score indicates more severe withdrawal symptoms. Scores between 5 and 12 indicate mild withdrawal, scores between 13 and 24 indicate moderate withdrawal, scores between 25 and 36 indicate moderately severe withdrawal and scores greater than 36 indicate severe withdrawal. A COWS score reduction of 15% or greater for a given individual is considered clinically significant.
60 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) score
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Comparison of mean percent change in COWS score in delayed active tAN versus active tAN groups at 30 minutes
30 minutes
Clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) responder rate
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Comparison of the proportion of participants with a clinically significant reduction in COWS score (defined as a 15% or greater reduction) in delayed-active tAN versus active tAN groups at 30 minutes
30 minutes
Clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) score
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Mean percent change in COWS score from baseline to 30 minutes after start of active tAN therapy
30 minutes
Clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) score
Time Frame: 120 minutes
Mean percent change in COWS score from baseline to 120 minutes after start of active tAN therapy
120 minutes
Clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) score
Time Frame: Days 2-5
Mean percent change in COWS score from baseline to Days 2 through 5 after start of active tAN therapy
Days 2-5

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Day 5
Mean change in depression symptoms measured by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) total score from baseline to Day 5. The PHQ-9 is a nine-item depression scale based directly on the nine diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder in the DSM-IV. Each of the nine items is rated on a 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) scale. A total score is calculated by summing the nine items. Scores range from 0 to 27 and higher scores indicate a higher degree of depression.
Day 5
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Time Frame: Day 5
Mean change in PTSD symptoms measured by the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) total symptom severity score from baseline to Day 5. The PCL-5 is a 20-item self-report measure that assesses the 20 DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD. Each of the 20 items is rated on a 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) scale. A total symptom severity score is calculated by summing the 20 items. Scores range from 0 and 80 and higher scores indicating a higher degree of PTSD symptomology. Evidence suggests that a10-20 point reduction in score represents a clinically significant change in PTSD symptoms.
Day 5
World Health Organization Quality of Life - BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: Day 5
Mean change in WHOQOL-BREF domain scores (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, environment, and overall QoL/general health) from baseline to Day 5. The World Health Organization Quality of Life - BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) is a 26-item, self-report questionnaire which assesses 4 quality of life domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. In addition, there are 2 items that measure overall quality of life and general health. Subjects rate how much they have experienced each item in the preceding 2 weeks on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely). Domain scores are scaled in a positive direction with higher scores denoting higher quality of life. Raw domain scores will be converted to a 0 to 100 scale.
Day 5
Heart rate variability measured by R to R interval
Time Frame: Days 2-5
Mean change from baseline to Days 2-5 in heart rate variability measured by R to R interval
Days 2-5
C-reactive protein (CRP) levels
Time Frame: Day 5
Mean change in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels from baseline to Day 5
Day 5
Cortisol levels
Time Frame: Day 5
Mean change in cortisol levels from baseline to Day 5
Day 5
Cytokine levels
Time Frame: Day 5
Mean change in cytokine levels from baseline to Day 5
Day 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Spark Biomedical, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Navid Khodaparast, PhD, Spark Biomedical, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 19, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 14, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 14, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SBM-OWP-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings