Psychometric Validation of the ESAS12-F (ESAS12-F)

August 30, 2019 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Psychometric Validation of the French Version of the Modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale: The ESAS12-F.

Assessing symptoms of patients with cancer should be a priority for the physicians to improve their quality of life. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) is a common tool, easy to complete and to analyse. Originally, it has been validated in English with 9 common symptoms. But a new version with 12 commons symptoms and some explanations has been created. This modified version has been translated in French, and the transcultural validation has been done. But the psychometreic validation has not been validated yet.

The primary objective is to validate the psychometric properties of this new version in French.

To validate the tool, we will compare the ESAS12-F to the European Organization for research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) which assesses common symptoms for patients with cancer, which is validated in French, but which is longer and more difficult to complete and to analyse. the patient will complete the ESAS 12-F and the EORTC QLQ-C30 at day 1, then the ESAS12-F at day 2, and the ESAS12-F and the EORTC QLQ-C30 at day 7.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Pierre-Bénite, France
        • Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients more than18 YO with advanced cancer, followed by the palliative care team, without any cognitive impairment

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • more than 18YO
  • with advanced cancer
  • followed but the palliative care team of the Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
  • without any cognitive impairment
  • can read and speak French

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive impairment
  • bad performance status
  • cannot read or speak French
  • no advanced cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients with cancer
Other: Tool assessing symptoms validation
Comparison between 2 tools evaluating the symptoms of patients with advanced cancer: the ESAS12-F and the EORTC QLQ C30 to assess if the ESAS12-F well evaluates the symptoms and if it is easy to complete. The objective is to validate the ESAS12-F, which is easier and shorter than the well validated EORTC QLQ C30

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
validation of the psychometric properties of the French version of the modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, the ESAS12-F: construct validity
Time Frame: day 1

The validation of the French version of the modified ESAS scale will be made by assessing the following metrological properties: validity (criterion validity and construct validity) :

Criterion validity will be established against the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale using correlation coefficient for each item. It will be assessed at Day 1 and Day 7. Construct validity will be assessed by a principal component analysis (PCA) an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and then a confirmatory analysis (CFA) on an independent sample.
day 1
validation of the psychometric properties of the French version of the modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, the ESAS12-F: construct validity
Time Frame: day 2

The validation of the French version of the modified ESAS scale will be made by assessing the following metrological properties: validity (criterion validity and construct validity) :

Criterion validity will be established against the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale using correlation coefficient for each item. It will be assessed at Day 1 and Day 7. Construct validity will be assessed by a principal component analysis (PCA) an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and then a confirmatory analysis (CFA) on an independent sample.
day 2
validation of the psychometric properties of the French version of the modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, the ESAS12-F: construct validity
Time Frame: day 7

The validation of the French version of the modified ESAS scale will be made by assessing the following metrological properties: validity (criterion validity and construct validity) :

Criterion validity will be established against the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale using correlation coefficient for each item. It will be assessed at Day 1 and Day 7. Construct validity will be assessed by a principal component analysis (PCA) an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and then a confirmatory analysis (CFA) on an independent sample.
day 7
validation of the psychometric properties of the French version of the modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, the ESAS12-F: test-retest reliability
Time Frame: day 2

The validation of the French version of the modified ESAS scale will be made by assessing the following metrological properties: reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) :

Internal consistency will be checked using Cronbach's alpha coefficient or a more adequate coefficient whenever the former is not applicable. Test-retest reliability will be checked using the intra-class correlation coefficient. It will be assessed at Day 2 and Day 7.
day 2
validation of the psychometric properties of the French version of the modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, the ESAS12-F: test-retest reliability
Time Frame: day 7

The validation of the French version of the modified ESAS scale will be made by assessing the following metrological properties: reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) :

Internal consistency will be checked using Cronbach's alpha coefficient or a more adequate coefficient whenever the former is not applicable. Test-retest reliability will be checked using the intra-class correlation coefficient. It will be assessed at Day 2 and Day 7.
day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospices Civils de Lyon

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Colombe TRICOU, MD, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ESAS12-F

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Tool assessing symptoms validation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings