Alternative Prophylaxis in Female Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (AlP-FrUiT)

February 18, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Non-antimicrobial Alternative in Prophylaxis of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: a Prospective, Randomised-controlled, Double-blinded, Multicentre Study

Urological pathogens are effected by rising antimicrobial resistance rates due to the frequent use of antimicrobials for treatment and prophylaxis. Intravesical instillation with hyaluronic acid (HA) and chondroitin sulphate (CS) obtained positive outcomes in the treatment of overactive bladder, radiation cystitis and interstitial cystitis by replenishment of the glycosaminoglycan layer of the bladder. This study is to investigate whether intravesical instillation with HA-CS in patients with recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI) is superior to a placebo instillation in terms of reduction of rate of symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs) (based on clinical diagnosis) needing treatment with antimicrobials within 12 months after randomisation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Basel
        • Contact:
      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Linda Maria Stamm

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented history of rUTI, defined as ≥ 3 episodes of (un)complicated UTI documented by urine culture with the isolation of ≥103 cfu/ml of an identified pathogen in the last year with clinical symptoms OR 2 episodes in the last 6 month

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No informed consent
  • Concomitant UTI (< 7 days prior to randomisation)
  • Ongoing antimicrobial prophylaxis (e.g. for rUTI or for any other reason like endocarditis, transplanted patients under immunosuppression)
  • Ongoing prophylactic strategy (e.g. immunoactive prophylaxis)
  • Documented underlying urogenital abnormality (e.g. significant post voiding residual volume (>50 ml), urethral stricture, urethral diverticula, urinary stone, reflux, urinary neoplasia), urological device (e.g. catheter, ureteral stent) or symptomatic pelvic floor disorder (e.g. genital prolapse stage ≥ II)
  • Concomitant disease (i.e. renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, corticosteroid use)
  • Urogenital urological or gynecological surgery < 6 weeks
  • Known allergy to the study medication
  • Use of spermicides or intrauterine device
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: intervention group A
50 ml of a sterile sodium HA (800 mg)- CS (1g) solution (Ialuril Prefill®, IBSA Farmaceutici Italia Srl, Via Martiri di Cefalonia 2, 26900 Lodi, Italy) weekly for four weeks, then every second week in the second month and four weeks later
Drug: intravesical instillation with HA-CS
intravesical instillation with HA-CS (Ialuril Prefill®, IBSA Farmaceutici Italia Srl, Lodi, Italy)
Placebo Comparator: control group B
50 ml sterile purified water weekly for four weeks, then every second week in the second month and four weeks later
Drug: intravesical instillation of sterile purified water
intravesical instillation of sterile purified water (packed and labelled according to Good Manufacturing Practice at IBSA Farmaceutici Italia Srl in Lodi, Italy to provide adequate blinding)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of symptomatic UTIs (based on clinical diagnosis) needing treatment with antimicrobials
Time Frame: within 12 months after randomisation
Rate of symptomatic UTIs (based on clinical diagnosis) needing treatment with antimicrobials (cumulative number)
within 12 months after randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptomatic UTI (based on clinical diagnosis supported by measured bacteriuria of ≥103 cfu/ml) treated with antimicrobials
Time Frame: at screening and at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Symptomatic UTI (based on clinical diagnosis supported by measured bacteriuria of ≥103 cfu/ml) treated with antimicrobials (cumulative number)
at screening and at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Symptoms of UTI according to the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) (cumulative number of each symptom)
Time Frame: at screening and at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Change in Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS). The first part of the ACSS questionnaire consists of 14 questions. The first 6 questions assess typical symptoms of UTI: frequency, urgency, pain and burning during urination, sensation of incomplete bladder emptying, pain/discomfort in the lower abdomen, visible hematuria. Each question concerning urinary symptoms allows the patient to choose one out of four answers indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The answers are assigned points from 0 to 3. The score can range between 0 and 18. It has been validated and a score ≥ 6 seems to be very indicative for the diagnosis of an UTI.
at screening and at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Time to UTI recurrence (as days between randomisation and the first recurring UTI)
Time Frame: at screening and at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Time to UTI recurrence (as days between randomisation and the first recurring UTI)
at screening and at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Asymptomatic bacteriuria of ≥105 cfu/ml
Time Frame: at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8) if the urine dipstick is suspicious, at the 7th instillation (= week 12 )and at 12 month follow-up
Asymptomatic bacteriuria, measured by number of colony forming Units (cfu) of ≥105 cfu/ml
at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8) if the urine dipstick is suspicious, at the 7th instillation (= week 12 )and at 12 month follow-up
Detection of multidrug-resistant bacteria in urine culture (3Multiresistant gram negatives (MRGN), 4MRGN)
Time Frame: at screening and at at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Detection of multidrug-resistant bacteria in urine culture (3MRGN, 4MRGN) (yes/no)
at screening and at at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Prescribed defined daily doses (DDD) of antibiotics (cumulative sum of DDD)
Time Frame: from randomisation to 12 months
Prescribed defined daily doses (DDD) of antibiotics (cumulative sum of DDD)
from randomisation to 12 months
Change in Pelvic Pain and Urinary/Frequency (PUF) Symptom Scale
Time Frame: prior to randomisation and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
The PUF questionnaire consists of 12 questions. The first two questions allow the patient to choose one out of five answers (points 0-3), the following questions one out of four (points 0-3) indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. Seven of the questions concern symptoms (total count 23), four questions are part of the bother score (total count 12). Total score consists of symptom score and bother score (total count 35). The change of the score is calculated by subtracting the score at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months from the score at enrolment
prior to randomisation and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Change in QoL Short Form (SF)-36 score
Time Frame: prior to randomisation and at 12 months
The QoL SF-36 consists of 36 items including eight independent scales and two main dimensions 35 of the items are compressed into eight multi-item scales: (1) physical functioning is a ten-question scale; (2) role-physical is a four-item scale; (3) bodily pain is a two-item scale; (4) general health is a five-item scale; (5) vitality is a four-item scale; (6) social functioning is a two-item scale; (7) role-emotional is a three-item scale; and (8) mental health is a five-item scale. Hence, in the SF-36 scoring system, the scales are assessed quantitatively, each on the basis of answers to two to ten multiple choice questions, and a score between 0 and 100 is then calculated on the basis of well-defined guidelines, with a higher score indicating a better state of health. The change of the score is calculated by subtracting the score at 12 month from the score at enrolment.
prior to randomisation and at 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
IBSA Institut Biochimique SA

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kathrin Bausch, Dr. med, Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 27, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 18, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2019-01377; me19Bausch

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings