Alternative Prophylaxis in Female Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (AlP-FrUiT)

February 18, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Non-antimicrobial Alternative in Prophylaxis of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: a Prospective, Randomised-controlled, Double-blinded, Multicentre Study

Urological pathogens are effected by rising antimicrobial resistance rates due to the frequent use of antimicrobials for treatment and prophylaxis. Intravesical instillation with hyaluronic acid (HA) and chondroitin sulphate (CS) obtained positive outcomes in the treatment of overactive bladder, radiation cystitis and interstitial cystitis by replenishment of the glycosaminoglycan layer of the bladder. This study is to investigate whether intravesical instillation with HA-CS in patients with recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI) is superior to a placebo instillation in terms of reduction of rate of symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs) (based on clinical diagnosis) needing treatment with antimicrobials within 12 months after randomisation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Basel
        • Contact:
      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Linda Maria Stamm

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented history of rUTI, defined as ≥ 3 episodes of (un)complicated UTI documented by urine culture with the isolation of ≥103 cfu/ml of an identified pathogen in the last year with clinical symptoms OR 2 episodes in the last 6 month

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No informed consent
  • Concomitant UTI (< 7 days prior to randomisation)
  • Ongoing antimicrobial prophylaxis (e.g. for rUTI or for any other reason like endocarditis, transplanted patients under immunosuppression)
  • Ongoing prophylactic strategy (e.g. immunoactive prophylaxis)
  • Documented underlying urogenital abnormality (e.g. significant post voiding residual volume (>50 ml), urethral stricture, urethral diverticula, urinary stone, reflux, urinary neoplasia), urological device (e.g. catheter, ureteral stent) or symptomatic pelvic floor disorder (e.g. genital prolapse stage ≥ II)
  • Concomitant disease (i.e. renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, corticosteroid use)
  • Urogenital urological or gynecological surgery < 6 weeks
  • Known allergy to the study medication
  • Use of spermicides or intrauterine device
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: intervention group A
50 ml of a sterile sodium HA (800 mg)- CS (1g) solution (Ialuril Prefill®, IBSA Farmaceutici Italia Srl, Via Martiri di Cefalonia 2, 26900 Lodi, Italy) weekly for four weeks, then every second week in the second month and four weeks later
intravesical instillation with HA-CS (Ialuril Prefill®, IBSA Farmaceutici Italia Srl, Lodi, Italy)
Placebo Comparator: control group B
50 ml sterile purified water weekly for four weeks, then every second week in the second month and four weeks later
intravesical instillation of sterile purified water (packed and labelled according to Good Manufacturing Practice at IBSA Farmaceutici Italia Srl in Lodi, Italy to provide adequate blinding)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of symptomatic UTIs (based on clinical diagnosis) needing treatment with antimicrobials
Time Frame: within 12 months after randomisation
Rate of symptomatic UTIs (based on clinical diagnosis) needing treatment with antimicrobials (cumulative number)
within 12 months after randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptomatic UTI (based on clinical diagnosis supported by measured bacteriuria of ≥103 cfu/ml) treated with antimicrobials
Time Frame: at screening and at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Symptomatic UTI (based on clinical diagnosis supported by measured bacteriuria of ≥103 cfu/ml) treated with antimicrobials (cumulative number)
at screening and at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Symptoms of UTI according to the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) (cumulative number of each symptom)
Time Frame: at screening and at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Change in Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS). The first part of the ACSS questionnaire consists of 14 questions. The first 6 questions assess typical symptoms of UTI: frequency, urgency, pain and burning during urination, sensation of incomplete bladder emptying, pain/discomfort in the lower abdomen, visible hematuria. Each question concerning urinary symptoms allows the patient to choose one out of four answers indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The answers are assigned points from 0 to 3. The score can range between 0 and 18. It has been validated and a score ≥ 6 seems to be very indicative for the diagnosis of an UTI.
at screening and at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Time to UTI recurrence (as days between randomisation and the first recurring UTI)
Time Frame: at screening and at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Time to UTI recurrence (as days between randomisation and the first recurring UTI)
at screening and at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Asymptomatic bacteriuria of ≥105 cfu/ml
Time Frame: at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8) if the urine dipstick is suspicious, at the 7th instillation (= week 12 )and at 12 month follow-up
Asymptomatic bacteriuria, measured by number of colony forming Units (cfu) of ≥105 cfu/ml
at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8) if the urine dipstick is suspicious, at the 7th instillation (= week 12 )and at 12 month follow-up
Detection of multidrug-resistant bacteria in urine culture (3Multiresistant gram negatives (MRGN), 4MRGN)
Time Frame: at screening and at at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Detection of multidrug-resistant bacteria in urine culture (3MRGN, 4MRGN) (yes/no)
at screening and at at each instillation visit (week 1 = Randomization, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 12) and at follow-up visits after randomization (month 6, month 9, month 12)
Prescribed defined daily doses (DDD) of antibiotics (cumulative sum of DDD)
Time Frame: from randomisation to 12 months
Prescribed defined daily doses (DDD) of antibiotics (cumulative sum of DDD)
from randomisation to 12 months
Change in Pelvic Pain and Urinary/Frequency (PUF) Symptom Scale
Time Frame: prior to randomisation and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
The PUF questionnaire consists of 12 questions. The first two questions allow the patient to choose one out of five answers (points 0-3), the following questions one out of four (points 0-3) indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. Seven of the questions concern symptoms (total count 23), four questions are part of the bother score (total count 12). Total score consists of symptom score and bother score (total count 35). The change of the score is calculated by subtracting the score at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months from the score at enrolment
prior to randomisation and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Change in QoL Short Form (SF)-36 score
Time Frame: prior to randomisation and at 12 months
The QoL SF-36 consists of 36 items including eight independent scales and two main dimensions 35 of the items are compressed into eight multi-item scales: (1) physical functioning is a ten-question scale; (2) role-physical is a four-item scale; (3) bodily pain is a two-item scale; (4) general health is a five-item scale; (5) vitality is a four-item scale; (6) social functioning is a two-item scale; (7) role-emotional is a three-item scale; and (8) mental health is a five-item scale. Hence, in the SF-36 scoring system, the scales are assessed quantitatively, each on the basis of answers to two to ten multiple choice questions, and a score between 0 and 100 is then calculated on the basis of well-defined guidelines, with a higher score indicating a better state of health. The change of the score is calculated by subtracting the score at 12 month from the score at enrolment.
prior to randomisation and at 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kathrin Bausch, Dr. med, Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 27, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Tract Infections

Clinical Trials on intravesical instillation with HA-CS

Subscribe