CogT BEEM Study (a tDCS Study)

November 6, 2023 updated by: Vankee Lin, University of Rochester

Effectiveness of a Non-Invasive, Low-Intensity Brain Stimulation Approach in Addressing Emotional Regulation

Co-existing neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), especially those worsening over time, are associated with more rapid cognitive and functional decline and a greater risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Optimal NPS management, meaning effectively managing multiple NPS simultaneously, requires a solid understanding of the shared neural mechanism across NPS. The goal of this proof-of-concept mechanistic intervention study is to validate the causal relationship between a NPS-shared neural circuit the investigators previously discovered and various NPS. The investigators will modify a key region within the NPS-shared neural circuit [i.e. left precentral gyrus (LPG), critical for regulating visual attention] with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Our central hypothesis is that an activation of LPG and a reorganization of NPS-shared neural circuit will link to improvement in multiple NPS. Using a Stage 0 pilot randomized control trial design the investigators will recruit n = 40 older adults with informant-rated NPS that has worsened in the past 2 years, which is considered the most detrimental type of NPS in MCI. The investigators will assign participants to 4-week active anodal vs. sham LPG online tDCS group. The investigators will assess resting-state and visual attention task-related functional MRI and informant-rated NPS at baseline, and the end of week 4 and week 8, and diffusion MRI at baseline. The two primary aims are to determine the effect of tDCS on NPS-shared neural circuit (Aim 1), as well as the relationship between NPS-shared neural circuit and informant-report NPS (Aim 2). The exploratory aim will be to examine the relationship between NPS and the coherence between structural and functional aspects of the NPS-shared neural circuit. Probing the LPG via anodal tDCS provides a way to experimentally test the causal relationship between our previously discovered NPS-shared neural circuit and informant-rated NPS. The proposed research is highly innovative, while scientifically grounded, for targeting one brain region that may affect multiple NPS. Validating the hypotheses has the potential for future R01 study that directly conducts a Stage 2 trial addressing NPS in MCI, and thus ultimately improves patient's quality of life and reducing caregiving burden.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642-0001
        • Cabin, Ur

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Forty subjects with MCI and comorbid NPS, which have worsened in the past 2 years (as rated by their study-partner's responses to the NPI-Q):

  1. In the past month, presence of > 2 symptoms; and
  2. Compared to two years ago, having > 1 pre-exist symptom whose severity rating has worsened, or having > 1 new symptom; 2. Consensus diagnosis of "mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease" based on 2011 NIA-AA diagnostic criteria by the investigators based on screening information: i. Memory deficits at screening: 1 standard deviation (SD) below age- and/or education- corrected population norms for the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT, Lists C&D); ii. Global memory deficits at screening: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA, Version 2) total score within the range 18 ≤ x ≤ 26, after educational adjustment; iii. Preserved activity of daily living: ADL-PI-self total score ≤ 30; iv. Absence of dementia. 3. Stable (same dosage, frequency, type) on memory medications for ≥ 3 months before screening; 4. Stable (same dosage, frequency, type) on any anti-depressants, antipsychotics, and/or anxiolytics for ≥ 7 days; 5. Community-dwelling: Subjects live in homes or independent- and assisted- living facilities (i.e. - not nursing home residents, due to the large cognitive variability in nursing home residents); 6. Aged 60-89 years at screening; 7. English-speaking; 8. Adequate visual and hearing acuity for testing; 9. Verified tDCS and MRI safety: Subject should not have any contraindications to either and pass safety screening questions for both (see exclusion section for more information); 10. Capacity to consent, based on responses and ratings to the UCSD Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) form modified for this study 11. Availability of a study partner who spends at least several hours per week with the subject, supervises his/her care, and who is willing to accompany the subject to some study visits and participate in the study; 12. Informed consent for study participation obtained by both the subject and his/her study partner; 13. Agree to donate 20mL of blood at baseline, after fasting for at least 8 hours (only water and prescribed medicines)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants may be excluded from enrollment, or have their enrollment deferred until they are eligible, for the reasons listed below. Final decisions regarding enrollment will be determined by the PI on a case-by-case basis.

    1. Presence of any neurological or vascular disorders (e.g. - Multiple Sclerosis [MS], Traumatic Brain Injury [TBI], chronic heart failure [CHF], Parkinson's disease [PD]);
    2. Clinical diagnosis of dementia as defined by the most recent version of the DSM;
    3. Current enrollment in another study aimed at improving cognitive abilities and/or emotional well-being;
    4. MRI contraindications (e.g. - pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD], aneurysm clips, severe claustrophobia);
    5. tDCS contraindications (e.g. - scalp or skin condition, history of migraines, seizures or epilepsy, and/or strokes, TBI), metallic implants, history of adverse effects to previous tDCS or other brain stimulation techniques).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: active tDCS
We will apply the stimulation for 20 minutes using current at 1.5mA with a ramp up and ramp down period of 30 seconds at the start and end of the session.
Device: tDCS
tDCS (LPG/C3-anode, orbitofrontal cortex/Fp2-cathode) will be administered for 4 weeks (1 session per weekday for 2 weeks, and then 2 sessions per week for 2 weeks, for a total of 14 sessions). All subjects will receive anodal tDCS stimulation for 20 minutes per session, on C3 and the cathode electrode on Fp2 using 10/20 EEG system. tDCS will be applied with a pair of 35 cm2 single-use sponges soaked in approximately 4mL of saline solution on each side (~8mL per sponge) connected to the stimulator. During the 20-minute tDCS session, we will use online tDCS design (i.e., a subject will simultaneously work on the visual attention-oriented task.
Sham Comparator: sham tDCS
tDCS will ramp up for 30 seconds with 1 mA current and then ramp off within 10 seconds. As 30 seconds is too short for tDCS to have any effects, this will be the control condition. tDCS is on for 30 seconds because that is usually the only time individuals would experience tingling and itching - a factor we aim to equate between experimental and control conditions.
Device: tDCS
tDCS (LPG/C3-anode, orbitofrontal cortex/Fp2-cathode) will be administered for 4 weeks (1 session per weekday for 2 weeks, and then 2 sessions per week for 2 weeks, for a total of 14 sessions). All subjects will receive anodal tDCS stimulation for 20 minutes per session, on C3 and the cathode electrode on Fp2 using 10/20 EEG system. tDCS will be applied with a pair of 35 cm2 single-use sponges soaked in approximately 4mL of saline solution on each side (~8mL per sponge) connected to the stimulator. During the 20-minute tDCS session, we will use online tDCS design (i.e., a subject will simultaneously work on the visual attention-oriented task.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of C3 Activation (NPS-shared Neural Circuit Measure
Time Frame: from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks)
Change of arbitrary unit LPG activation in response to visual attention task (measured using task related fMRI). No theoretical minimum or maximum exists for this scale.
from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks)
Change of C3 Connectivity (NPS-shared Neural Circuit Measure 21)
Time Frame: from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks)
Change of arbitrary unit of correlation between LPG and amygdala at rest (resting fMRI). No theoretical minimum or maximum exists for this scale.
from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Patient-report NPS
Time Frame: from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks)
Patient-reported NPS was measured using three mood-related questionnaires that probed mood within the past week: depression (Geriatric Depressive Scale ;GDS-30); anxiety (State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory; STAI-state); and apathy (Apathy Evaluation Scale; AES). Total scores from individual measures were z-transformed (higher score indicating severer symptoms) across timepoints and averaged to create a composite mood score. A Z-score of 0 represents the population mean. Change of Z-score from baseline to post-intervention was used.
from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks)
Change of Informant-rated NPS
Time Frame: from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks)
Informant-reported NPS was measured using the 12-domain Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-Full), including both frequency and severity (based on present symptoms) during the past week. We first calculated the frequency x severity for each domain, then averaged across domains, and finally adjusted for caregiving burden. Higher is worse. We calculated the change of the arbitrary score from baseline to post-intervention. No theoretical minimum and maximum scores exist
from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Rochester

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 6, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 19, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 19, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 6, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STUDY00003664
  • R21MH120734 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on tDCS

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings