The Relationship of Orthodontic Malocclusions With Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Investigation of the Relationship of Orthodontic Malocclusions With Temporomandibular Joint Disorders by Helkimo's Indices and Oral Health Impact Profile-14
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Şehitkamil
-
Gaziantep, Şehitkamil, Turkey, 27310
- Gaziantep University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- wish to receive orthodontic treatment in our clinic.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The absence of willingness for the temporomandibular joint and clinical examination or answering the survey questions.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Oral Health Impact Profile
To evaluate the Oral Health-related Quality of Life, Turkish version of Oral Health Impact Profile-14 was used.
Responses were made on a scale 0 (never), 1(hardly ever), 2 (occasionally), 3 (fairly often),and 4 (very often).Oral Health-related Quality of Life impairment was characterized by the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 summary score (the sum of all 14 items, potential range 0-56).
Higher Oral Health Impact Profile-14 scores mean worse Oral Health-related Quality of Life and vice versa.
|
Patients under 18 years of age
Patients over18 years of age
Girls
Boys
|
|
Helkimo's anamnestic dysfunction index
As a method based on patient feedback for the determination of the degree of temporomandibular disorders, anamnestic index was used.
For this purpose eight questions were asked to the patients that includes answers as 'yes' or 'no'.
(Table 2) The analyses of the questionnaire was done according to anamnestic scale as 0: no symptoms; I: mild symptoms (sensation of the jaw fatigue, jaw stiffness, and temporomandibular joint sounds as clicking or crepitus) and II:severe symptoms (included one or more of the following: Difficulty in the mouth opening, jaw locking, mandible dislocation and its painful movement and painful temporomandibular joint region and/or masticatory muscles)
|
Patients under 18 years of age
Patients over18 years of age
Girls
Boys
|
|
Visual analog scale (VAS) for facial pain:
Facial pain was measured by asking the patients if they had had any pain during last 12 months and made them mark the intensity of the pain on a visual analog scale which had the anchor points at the left (no pain) and right (worse pain) ends of a 10 cm horizontal line.
The analyses of the facial pain was done as fallowing: if the patient marked no facial pain the Visual analog scale value was accepted as 0 and if the patient marked any level of facial pain Visual analog scale value was accepted as 1.
|
Patients under 18 years of age
Patients over18 years of age
Girls
Boys
|
|
Helkimo's clinical dysfunction index (DI):
Maximum opening of mandible, deviation during opening, dysfunction of temporomandibular joint, pain in the temporomandibular joint and pain in the masticatory muscles was evaluated
|
Patients under 18 years of age
Patients over18 years of age
Girls
Boys
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oral Health Impact Profile
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 months. The scale ranged from 0-5. All data will be summed at the end of the study. Higher values means worse quality of life standard
|
Oral Health Impact Profile relations between patients under 18 and over 18 and between girls and boys
|
through study completion, an average of 2 months. The scale ranged from 0-5. All data will be summed at the end of the study. Higher values means worse quality of life standard
|
|
Helkimo's anamnestic dysfunction index
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 months. The scale ranged from 0-3. Higher scale means worse quality of life standards
|
Helkimo's anamnestic dysfunction index relations between patients under 18 and over 18 and between girls and boys
|
through study completion, an average of 2 months. The scale ranged from 0-3. Higher scale means worse quality of life standards
|
|
Helkimo's clinical dysfunction index
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 months. The scale ranged from 0-3. Higher scale means worse quality of life standards
|
Helkimo's clinical dysfunction index relations between patients under 18 and over 18 and between girls and boys
|
through study completion, an average of 2 months. The scale ranged from 0-3. Higher scale means worse quality of life standards
|
|
Visual analog scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 months.
|
Visual analog scale relations between patients under 18 and over 18 and between girls and boys.
The scale ranged from 0-1.
If the patient marked no facial pain the visual analog scale value was accepted as 0, if the patient marked any level of facial pain visual analog scale value was accepted as 1.
|
through study completion, an average of 2 months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Merve Goymen, PhD, University of Gaziantep
- Study Chair: Yeşim Kaya, Yuzuncu Yıl University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 81
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.