Evaluation of Anesthetic Techniques in Outpatient Total Joint Replacement Surgery in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
South San Francisco, California, United States, 94080
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA 1 - IV patients
- Age > 18
- Primary total hip/knee replacement
Exclusion Criteria:
- Total joint replacement for oncologic tumors
- Emergent surgery
- Age < 17
- Pregnant Female
- Neuraxial anesthesia conversion to general anesthesia
- Revision total joint replacement
- Bilateral total joint replacement
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Total Joint Arthroplasty
The cohort includes patients undergoing outpatient primary total joint replacement surgeries from 2017 to 2019.
Primary total joint surgery is defined as patients who undergo unilateral total knee replacement or total hip replacement for the first time during the study years
|
The anesthetic type either general anesthesia or neuraxial anesthesia is the intervention type for patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty of the knee or hip.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Morbidity
Time Frame: 30-day postoperative
|
30-day Postoperative Morbidity including surgical site infection (defined as infection involving the skin or subcutaneous tissue of the incision, deep incisional infection defined as infected tissue below the subcutaneous tissue including fascia and muscle), major coronary events (defined as nonfatal myocardial infarction, heart failure, ventricular tachycardia, cardiac arrest), pneumonia, urinary tract infection, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accident, renal injury/failure (Defined as increase in baseline creatinine 2 fold/3fold respectively).
|
30-day postoperative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Mortality
Time Frame: 30-day postoperative
|
30-day postoperative mortality - all cause
|
30-day postoperative
|
|
Postoperative readmission
Time Frame: 30-day postoperative
|
30-day postoperative readmission - all cause
|
30-day postoperative
|
|
Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion rates
Time Frame: Day of surgery
|
Measurement of blood loss by mL recorded on record.
Measurement of packed red blood cells transfused by unit pack.
|
Day of surgery
|
|
Intraoperative opioid use
Time Frame: Day of surgery
|
Defined by type of analgesic medication and total morphine equivalence
|
Day of surgery
|
|
Postoperative opioid use
Time Frame: Day of surgery
|
Defined by type of analgesic medication and total morphine equivalence
|
Day of surgery
|
|
Postoperative Pain Scores
Time Frame: Day of surgery
|
Numerical Rating Scale of postsurgical pain measured until discharge from hospital.
Numerical rating scale for pain is described as a scale from a minimum of 0, associated with no pain, to a maximum of 10, associated with the worst possible pain.
A higher number is associated with a worse outcome.
|
Day of surgery
|
|
Postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: Day of surgery
|
Rate of PONV after surgery
|
Day of surgery
|
|
Length of postsurgical hospital stay
Time Frame: Day of surgery
|
Length of time defined from end of intraoperative time to discharge from hospital time
|
Day of surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Edward N Yap, MD, Kaiser Permanente
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Myles PS, Williams DL, Hendrata M, Anderson H, Weeks AM. Patient satisfaction after anaesthesia and surgery: results of a prospective survey of 10,811 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):6-10. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013383.
- Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, Sage D, Futter M, Saville G, Clark T, MacMahon S. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000 Dec 16;321(7275):1493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1493.
- Macfarlane AJ, Prasad GA, Chan VW, Brull R. Does regional anaesthesia improve outcome after total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Sep;103(3):335-45. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep208. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
- Liu VX, Rosas E, Hwang J, Cain E, Foss-Durant A, Clopp M, Huang M, Lee DC, Mustille A, Kipnis P, Parodi S. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Implementation in 2 Surgical Populations in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System. JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 19;152(7):e171032. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1032. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
- Memtsoudis SG, Sun X, Chiu YL, Stundner O, Liu SS, Banerjee S, Mazumdar M, Sharrock NE. Perioperative comparative effectiveness of anesthetic technique in orthopedic patients. Anesthesiology. 2013 May;118(5):1046-58. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318286061d. Erratum In: Anesthesiology. 2016 Sep;125(3):610.
- Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;45(6):613-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8.
- Berger RA, Sanders SA, Thill ES, Sporer SM, Della Valle C. Newer anesthesia and rehabilitation protocols enable outpatient hip replacement in selected patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1424-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0741-x. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
- Holte K, Kehlet H. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia - effects on surgical stress responses and implications for postoperative nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2002 Jun;21(3):199-206. doi: 10.1054/clnu.2001.0514.
- Hu S, Zhang ZY, Hua YQ, Li J, Cai ZD. A comparison of regional and general anaesthesia for total replacement of the hip or knee: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Jul;91(7):935-42. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.21538.
- Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes S, Callaghan JJ. Differences in short-term complications between spinal and general anesthesia for primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Feb 6;95(3):193-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01682.
- Kehlet H, Aasvang EK. Regional or general anesthesia for fast-track hip and knee replacement - what is the evidence? F1000Res. 2015 Dec 15;4:F1000 Faculty Rev-1449. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7100.1. eCollection 2015.
- Harsten A, Kehlet H, Toksvig-Larsen S. Recovery after total intravenous general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Sep;111(3):391-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet104. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
- Harsten A, Kehlet H, Ljung P, Toksvig-Larsen S. Total intravenous general anaesthesia vs. spinal anaesthesia for total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Mar;59(3):298-309. doi: 10.1111/aas.12456. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
- Yap E, Wei J, Webb C, Ng K, Behrends M. Neuraxial and general anesthesia for outpatient total joint arthroplasty result in similarly low rates of major perioperative complications: a multicentered cohort study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 May;47(5):294-300. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103189. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1502384-1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.