The U.S. PDA Registry

December 17, 2019 updated by: Shyam K. Sathanandam, MD, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital

The United States Patent Ductus Arteriosus Registry

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the continued safety and efficacy in a real-world setting of transcatheter device closure of the PDA in premature infants less than 2kg in weight at the time of device implant using the Amplatzer Piccolo Occluder device and other devices performed in the USA.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Based on the IMPACT registry, there are over 6000 transcatheter device closures of PDA that occurs in the United States annually. However, there are no comprehensive data collection tools for this procedure. The current databases do not include multiple data points, or follow-up data, or a section for specific adverse events to be documented. Moreover, until now, there has been no approved devices for PDA closure in children < 2kg. This clinical study is the first of its kind to collect data from all transcatheter device closure of PDA in children < 2kg performed in the USA.This study will be limited to children between 700 to 2000 grams who are the most vulnerable population undergoing this procedure. This will allow us to understand the real world experience (efficacy and safety) of using the Amplatzer Piccolo Occluder and other devices in an extremely vulnerable, yet highly underserved population. The study will allow for standardization of this procedure throughout the country for the small children (<2 kg) with a PDA. This is a multi-center, single arm, observational data collection study. This will be a large population study to help analyze outcomes in subjects <2 kg. The trial has two primary endpoints for safety and effectiveness without formal hypothesis. The safety and effectiveness results will be compared with data reported in the ADO II AS IDE and Continued Access Protocol studies.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
5000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 2 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population is patients with diagnosis of PDA with clinical indication for transcatheter PDA closure, and weigh less than 2 kg at the time of device implant.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of PDA.
  2. Clinical indication for transcatheter PDA closure (discretion of the physician).
  3. Weight <2 kg at the time of device implant.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Weight <700 gm or greater than or equal to 2 kg at the time of device implant.
  2. Age < 3 days at the time of device implant.
  3. Pre-existing coarctation of the aorta.
  4. Pre-existing left pulmonary artery stenosis.
  5. Cardiac output that is dependent on right to left shunt through the PDA due to pulmonary hypertension.
  6. Intracardiac thrombus that interferes with device implant.
  7. Active infection requiring treatment at the time of impant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Other

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Registry Group
All participants will have the same data collected at the same time points.
Device: Transcatheter PDA Closure
Device utilized for closure of PDA, study is to help assure continued safety and effectiveness of FDA approved Amplatzer Piccolo Occluder device as well as other devices used off label for PDA closure in premature infants less than 2 kg at the time of device implant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vascular Access Complications (Safety)
Time Frame: 6 months
Access vessel complications include femoral arterial or femoral/jugular venous complications noted during the procedure, immediately after the procedure or delayed (>24 hours). They range from bleeding from access sites, arterial or venous thrombosis with or without the need for treatment to loss of limb secondary to arterial occlusion.
6 months
Valvular Injury (Safety)
Time Frame: 6 months
Valvular injury includes damage to the tricuspid valve or other cardiac valve resulting in immediate post-procedural valvular dysfunction.
6 months
Device Embolization (Safety)
Time Frame: 6 months
Device embolization includes malposition of the device either during or after the procedure or delayed (>24 hours). The outcome of device embolization ranges from observation, transcatheter retrieval at time of procedure or at a separate time, surgical retrieval, other end organ damage, to mortality.
6 months
Pulmonary or Aortic Vessel Stenosis (Safety)
Time Frame: 6 months
Adjacent vessel stenosis includes a narrowing of the aorta or the left pulmonary artery directly as a consequence of device implantation for PDA closure. Vessel stenosis could happen either during or after the procedure or delayed (>24 hours). The outcome of vessel stenosis ranges from no intervention needed to repeated transcatheter and surgical therapies.
6 months
Rate of Effective PDA Closure (Effectiveness)
Time Frame: 6 months
The effectiveness endpoint is the rate of effective closure of the PDA using a transcatheter device within six months post procedure. If more than one attempt is required, or multiple devices are required during the same procedure, it is still considered effective if there is Grade 0 or Grade 1 shunt, as defined below, at follow-up by transthoracic echocardiography or if a second procedure is not required following the initial attempt. If there is device embolization, adjacent vessel stenosis that required retrieval of the device and replacement during the same procedure with less than Grade 1 shunt during follow-up, it is still considered effective. Conversely, if an AE is noted after the procedure that requires a second procedure for treatment that results in greater than Grade 1 shunt, then the procedure is considered not effective, even if the initial attempt was effective. See protocol for PDA shunt definitions.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Significant obstruction of the left pulmonary artery
Time Frame: 6 months

Significant obstruction of the left pulmonary artery is defined as less than 30% flow to the left lung by lung perfusion scan or a peak instantaneous gradient in left pulmonary artery

≥35 mmHg by echocardiogram if lung perfusion scan is not available or as determined by the interventional cardiologist based on angiographic appearance.
6 months
Significant obstruction of the aorta
Time Frame: 6 months
Significant obstruction of the aorta is defined as a gradient of ≥20 mmHg in the aortic isthmus by invasive aortic catheterization or a mean gradient ≥20 mmHg in the aortic isthmus by echocardiogram if invasive aortic catheterization is not available.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Le Bonheur Children's Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Abbott

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Shyam Sathanandam, MD, National Principal Investigator

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2030

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 17, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • The U.S. PDA Registry

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

A Data Management Plan (DMP) will describe procedures used for data review, database cleaning, and issuing and resolving data queries. If appropriate, the DMP may be updated throughout the clinical investigation duration. All revisions will be tracked and document controlled. Subject data will be captured in a validated electronic data capture (EDC) system. Only authorized site personnel will be permitted to enter the CRF data through the EDC system. An electronic audit trail will be used to track any subsequent changes of the entered data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available when it is collected and added to the national database. It will be available for 12 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Investigators will submit proposal to request data to the Proposal Review Committee. If approved, de-identified data will be shared.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ductus Arteriosus, Patent

Clinical Trials on Transcatheter PDA Closure

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings