Randomized Controlled Trial on Effect of Lymph Node Mapping by Indocyanine Green Via Submucosal or Subserosal Injection
Comparison of Submucosal and Subserosal Approaches Toward Optimized Indocyanine Green Tracer-Guided Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer: The FUGES-019 Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Chang-Ming Huang, MD
- Phone Number: 86 13805069676
- Email: hcmlr2002@163.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Qi-Yue Chen, PhD
- Phone Number: +8615980235636
- Email: 690934662@qq.com
Study Locations
-
-
Fujian
-
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of Gastric Surgery
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Age from 18 to 75 years
- Primary gastric adenocarcinoma (papillary, tubular, mucinous, signet ring cell, or poorly differentiated) confirmed pathologically by endoscopic biopsy
- Clinical stage tumor T1-4a (cT1-4a), N0/+, M0 at preoperative evaluation according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual Eighth Edition. Preoperative staging was made by conducting mandatory computed tomography (CT) scans and an optional endoscopic ultrasound
- No distant metastasis, no direct invasion of pancreas, spleen or other organs nearby in the preoperative examinations
- Performance status of 0 or 1 on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale (ECOG)
- American Society of Anesthesiology score (ASA) class I, II, or III
- Written informed consent
Exclusion criteria:
- Women during pregnancy or breast-feeding
- Severe mental disorder
- History of previous upper abdominal surgery (except laparoscopic cholecystectomy)
- History of previous gastrectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection
- Rejection of laparoscopic resection
- History of allergy to iodine agents
- Enlarged or bulky regional lymph node diameter over 3cm by preoperative imaging
- History of other malignant disease within past five years
- History of previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy
- History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within past six months
- History of cerebrovascular accident within past six months
- History of continuous systematic administration of corticosteroids within one month
- Requirement of simultaneous surgery for other disease
- Emergency surgery due to complication (bleeding, obstruction or perforation) caused by gastric cancer
- Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)<50% of predicted values
- Linitis plastica, Widespread
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Subserosal injection of indocyanine green tracer group
Subserosal injection of indocyanine green, with a concentration of 0.5 mg /ml, 6 points along the lesser and greater curvature of the stomach, 1.5 ml for each point.
|
After preoperative exploration, the indocyanine green powder (Dandong Yichuang Pharmaceutical Co) is dissolved in 0.5 mg/ml of sterile water and the prepared solution (1.5 ml for each point) is injected along the subserosal of the stomach at 6 specific points along the lesser and greater curvature of the stomach.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Submucosal injection of indocyanine green tracer group
Submucosal injection of indocyanine green, with a concentration of 1.25mg /ml, four points around the primary tumor, each point 0.5 ml.
|
One day before surgery, 1.25 mg/ml indocyanine green (Dandong Yichuang Pharmaceutical Co) was prepared in sterile water and 0.5 ml of the solution was injected into the submucosal layer at 4 quadrants around the primary tumor, amounting to 2.5 mg of indocyanine green.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Total Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes
|
One month after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
3-year recurrence pattern
Time Frame: 36 months
|
Recurrence patterns are classified into five categories at the time of first diagnosis: locoregional, hematogenous, peritoneal, distant lymph node, and mixed type.
|
36 months
|
|
The variation of weight
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
|
The variation of weight on postoperative 3, 6, 9 and 12 months are used to access the postoperative nutritional status and quality of life.
|
3, 6, 9 and 12 months
|
|
Intraoperative morbidity rates
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The intraoperative postoperative morbidity rates are defined as the rates of event observed within operation.
|
1 day
|
|
The variation of white blood cell count
Time Frame: Preoperative 3 days and postoperative 1, 3, and 5 days
|
The values of white blood cell count from peripheral blood before operation and on postoperative day 1, 3, 5 are recorded to access the inflammatory and immune response.
|
Preoperative 3 days and postoperative 1, 3, and 5 days
|
|
The variation of hemoglobin
Time Frame: Preoperative 3 days and postoperative 1, 3, and 5 days
|
The values of hemoglobin in gram/liter from peripheral blood before operation and on postoperative day 1, 3, 5 are recorded to access the inflammatory and immune response.
|
Preoperative 3 days and postoperative 1, 3, and 5 days
|
|
The variation of C-reactive protein
Time Frame: Preoperative 3 days and postoperative 1, 3, and 5 days
|
The values of C-reactive protein IN milligram/liter from peripheral blood before operation and on postoperative day 1, 3, 5 are recorded to access the inflammatory and immune response.
|
Preoperative 3 days and postoperative 1, 3, and 5 days
|
|
Time to first ambulation
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Time to first ambulation in hours is used to assess the postoperative recovery course.
|
30 days
|
|
Time to first flatus
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Time to first flatus in days is used to assess the postoperative recovery course.
|
30 days
|
|
Time to first liquid diet
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Time to first liquid diet in days is used to assess the postoperative recovery course.
|
30 days
|
|
Time to first soft diet
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Time to first soft diet in days is used to assess the postoperative recovery course.
|
30 days
|
|
Duration of postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Duration of postoperative hospital stay in days is used to assess the postoperative recovery course.
|
30 days
|
|
Total number of fluorescent lymph nodes in groups A and B
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Total number of fluorescent lymph nodes in groups A and B
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes in groups A and B (true positive rate)
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes in groups A and B (true positive rate)
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes and negative lymph nodes in groups A and B (false positive rate)
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes and negative lymph nodes in groups A and B (false positive rate)
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Relationship between non-fluorescent and negative lymph nodes in groups A and B (true negative rate)
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Relationship between non-fluorescent and negative lymph nodes in groups A and B (true negative rate)
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Relationship between non-fluorescent lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes in groups A and B (false negative rate)
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Relationship between non-fluorescent lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes in groups A and B (false negative rate)
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Number of Metastasis Lymph Nodes
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Number of Metastasis Lymph Nodes
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Metastasis rate of lymph node
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Metastasis rate of lymph node
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Mortality rates
Time Frame: 30 days
|
This is for the early mortality, which defined as the event observed within 30 days after surgery.
|
30 days
|
|
Morbidity rates
Time Frame: 30 days
|
This is for the incidence of early postoperative complications, which defined as the event observed within 30 days after surgery.
|
30 days
|
|
The variation of BMI in kg/m^2
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
|
The variation of BMI in kg/m^2 on postoperative 3, 6, 9 and 12 months are used to access the postoperative nutritional status and quality of life.
|
3, 6, 9 and 12 months
|
|
Lymph node noncompliance rate
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Lymph node noncompliance was defined as the absence of lymph nodes that should have been excised from more than 1 lymph node station.
Major lymph node noncompliance was defined as more than 2 intended lymph node stations that were not removed.
|
1 day
|
|
Modified EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT14)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Participants were asked to complete one modified European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) IN-PATSAT14 questionnaire before their discharge from hospital.
|
30 days
|
|
The Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX)
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Surgeons were required to complete one modified SURG-TLX questionnaire for each procedure.
|
1 day
|
|
3-year disease free survival rate
Time Frame: 36 months
|
Disease-free survival is calculated from the day of surgery to the day of recurrence or death (When the specific date of recurrence of the tumor is unknown, the endpoint is the date of death due to tumor causes).
If neither death nor recurrence of the tumor is observed, the endpoint is the final date that a patient is confirmed as relapse-free.
(The final date of DFS: The last date of the outpatient visit day or the date of acceptance of the examination).
|
36 months
|
|
3-year overall survival rate
Time Frame: 36 months
|
The overall survival is calculated from the day of surgery until death or until the final follow-up date, whichever occurs first.
For survival cases, the endpoint is the last date that survival was confirmed.
If the loss to follow-up occurred, the endpoint is the final date that survival could be confirmed.
|
36 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Chang-Ming Huang, MD, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Herrera-Almario G, Patane M, Sarkaria I, Strong VE. Initial report of near-infrared fluorescence imaging as an intraoperative adjunct for lymph node harvesting during robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;113(7):768-70. doi: 10.1002/jso.24226. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
- Kwon IG, Son T, Kim HI, Hyung WJ. Fluorescent Lymphography-Guided Lymphadenectomy During Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2019 Feb 1;154(2):150-158. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4267.
- Lee JH, Ryu KW, Kim CG, Kim SK, Choi IJ, Kim YW, Chang HJ, Bae JM, Hong EK. Comparative study of the subserosal versus submucosal dye injection method for sentinel node biopsy in gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Nov;31(9):965-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.03.006.
- Cianchi F, Indennitate G, Paoli B, Ortolani M, Lami G, Manetti N, Tarantino O, Messeri S, Foppa C, Badii B, Novelli L, Skalamera I, Nelli T, Coratti F, Perigli G, Staderini F. The Clinical Value of Fluorescent Lymphography with Indocyanine Green During Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer: a Matched Cohort Study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Oct;24(10):2197-2203. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04382-y. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
- Chen QY, Zhong Q, Liu ZY, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Lin JL, Li P, Zheng CH, Huang CM. Does Noncompliance in Lymph Node Dissection Affect Oncological Efficacy in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1759-1771. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07217-x. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
- Bredart A, Bottomley A, Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Coens C, D'Haese S, Chie WC, Hammerlid E, Arraras JI, Efficace F, Rodary C, Schraub S, Costantini M, Costantini A, Joly F, Sezer O, Razavi D, Mehlitz M, Bielska-Lasota M, Aaronson NK; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group and Quality of Life Unit. An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32). Eur J Cancer. 2005 Sep;41(14):2120-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.041.
- Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters RS. Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg. 2011 Sep;35(9):1961-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1141-4.
- Tajima Y, Yamazaki K, Masuda Y, Kato M, Yasuda D, Aoki T, Kato T, Murakami M, Miwa M, Kusano M. Sentinel node mapping guided by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 2009 Jan;249(1):58-62. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181927267.
- Chen QY, Xie JW, Zhong Q, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Lin JL, Zheng HL, Li P, Zheng CH, Huang CM. Safety and Efficacy of Indocyanine Green Tracer-Guided Lymph Node Dissection During Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy in Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2020 Apr 1;155(4):300-311. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6033.
- Chen QY, Zhong Q, Li P, Xie JW, Liu ZY, Huang XB, Lin GT, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Zheng QL, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Zheng CH, Huang CM. Comparison of submucosal and subserosal approaches toward optimized indocyanine green tracer-guided laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for patients with gastric cancer (FUGES-019): a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2021 Oct 27;19(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02125-y.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- FUGES-019
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.