Left Atrial Imaging Prior to Cardioversion: Leveraging Computed Tomography to Rule Out Thrombus (LACLOT)

February 20, 2025 updated by: Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Evaluating contrast enhanced ECG-gated cardiac CT (CCT) as an alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to expedite cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF), improve patient care and reduce hospital admissions for AF and atrial flutter.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
102

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4W7
        • University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Admitted patients who require LA imaging prior to cardioversion
  2. Age ≥18 years old
  3. Able and willing to comply with the study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Indication for acute cardioversion (e.g. hemodynamic instability, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), or pulmonary edema)
  2. Unwillingness or inability to provide informed consent

  3. Contraindication to Cardiac CT

    • Severe renal insufficiency(GFR< 45ml/min)
    • Allergy to intravenous contrast agents
    • Contraindications to radiation exposure (for example, pregnancy)
    • Inability to perform 20-second breath-hold

  4. Contraindication to TEE

    • Unrepaired tracheoesophageal fistula
    • Esophageal obstruction or stricture
    • Perforated hollow viscus
    • Poor airway control
    • Severe respiratory depression
    • Uncooperative, unsedated patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: TEE arm
TEE will be performed as per clinical routine using multiple standard tomographic planes to rule-out LA/LAA thrombus. Echocardiographic analysis will include: LAA-emptying velocity, and grading the severity of LAA spontaneous ECHO. The severity of the SEC will be graded on a 4 point scale with 1 = minor homogeneous contrast enhancement, 2 = significant homogeneous contrast enhancement, 3 = significant, dense, and inhomogeneous, slow-moving contrast, and 4 = dense slow-moving contrast.
Diagnostic test: Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)
TEE is considered the reference standard to rule-out left atrial (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus prior to cardioversion. Several studies have examined the accuracy of TEE for detecting LAA thrombus. Compared to autopsy and intraoperative findings, TEE has a mean sensitivity of 100% and mean specificity of 99%. Although the gold standard, a TEE-guided therapy is still associated with an embolic rate of 0.8%.
Experimental: CCT arm
As per local protocol, a non-contrast enhanced prospective ECG-triggered image acquisition will be acquired. This will be followed by a contrast-enhanced prospective ECG-triggered will be acquired using a tri-phasic contrast protocols. Delayed CT images will be acquired 60 seconds after the initial contrast-enhanced CT scan.Cardiac CT image interpretation will be performed as per clinical routine. The LA and LAA will be assess for filling defects and characterized based upon attenuation values. If LA/LAA thrombus cannot be excluded, filling defects will be assessed on the delay images. Increases in attenuation would be consistent with pseudo-thrombus from 'slow flow' and 'incomplete opacification'. Areas where attenuation does not change significantly (persistent filling defect) will be diagnosed as thrombus. It will be recommended that patients with thrombus will undergo TEE.
Diagnostic test: Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)
TEE is considered the reference standard to rule-out left atrial (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus prior to cardioversion. Several studies have examined the accuracy of TEE for detecting LAA thrombus. Compared to autopsy and intraoperative findings, TEE has a mean sensitivity of 100% and mean specificity of 99%. Although the gold standard, a TEE-guided therapy is still associated with an embolic rate of 0.8%.
Diagnostic test: Contrast enhanced ECG-gated cardiac CT (CCT)
Contrast enhanced ECG-gated cardiac CT (CCT) is a sensitive, noninvasive alternative method used to exclude of left atrial and LAA thrombus. CCT provides high spatial and good temporal resolution and its ability to detect thrombus has been evaluated. CCT, compared to TEE, for the exclusion of thrombus in the LAA had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 99.3%, respectively. A high sensitivity is needed to minimize risk of embolus, and if a thrombus is detected on CT, a confirmatory TEE may be performed or patients may receive anticoagulation. Some argue that the potential benefits of CT and its lower associated procedural risk, the risk:benefit ratio would still favour CT.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Imaging
Time Frame: From admission to imaging/spontaneous cardioversion, up to approximately 30 days.
This outcome was measured by calculating the time between admission and imaging.
From admission to imaging/spontaneous cardioversion, up to approximately 30 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Cardioversion
Time Frame: From admission to cardioversion, up to approximately 30 days
This outcome was measured by calculating the time between admission and cardioversion.
From admission to cardioversion, up to approximately 30 days

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Hospital Discharge
Time Frame: From admission to hospital discharge, up to approximately 90 days.
This outcome was measured by calculating the time between admission and hospital discharge.
From admission to hospital discharge, up to approximately 90 days.
QoL
Time Frame: At hospital discharge
This outcome was calculated from the following QoLs: European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) and Atrial Fibrillation Impact (AFImpact). EQ-5D-5L health score is a continuous scale from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome. AFImpact scores were calculated using a seven-point Likert Scale (1=none of the time, 7=all of the time). AFImpact-Vitality, Emotional Distress, Sleep score (AFImpact-VEDS) was calculated using all questions in the questionnaire. The difference between AFImpact-VEDS scores at hospital admission and discharge was calculated where minimum change in score is 0 and maximum change in score is 108. AFImpact-emotional distress subscale score was calculated using 8 questions about emotional distress. The difference between AFImpact emotional distress scores at hospital admission and discharge was calculated where minimum change in score is 0 and maximum change in score is 48. The higher change in AFImpact scores represented a better outcome.
At hospital discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Benjamin Chow, MD, UOHI

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 21, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 12, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 20, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 201900117-01H

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings