Effectiveness of a Dialogue-based Online Intervention Against Migraine (EU-OPTMi)

September 2, 2024 updated by: Gaia AG

Effectiveness of the Unguided Online Program Ceprica for the Treatment of Migraine: a Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial

This trial was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a dialogue-based online intervention (ceprica) that provides information regarding cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in patients with migraine.

The study aims to test the hypothesis that ceprica has a greater positive impact on migraine symptoms than an active control intervention providing psychoeducational content. Patients fulfilling ICHD-criteria for migraine will be randomized and allocated to either an intervention group, receiving ceprica in addition to treatment as usual, or a control group, which receives access to an active control intervention in addition to treatment as usual. The primary endpoint is the number of migraine days per month.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Migraine is common in the German population and leads to a decreased quality of life as well as high economic consequences. Cognitive behavioural therapy has shown to be effective in the treatment of migraine. Web-based psychological interventions are easily accessible and preliminary evidence suggests that such interventions can be effective.

In this study, the treatment effects of a novel dialogue-based online intervention compared to a psychoeducational control intervention will be investigated. The interventional online program ceprica contains elements of cognitive behavioural therapy that address specific approaches in the management of pain, integrated in an individually tailored dialogue that is based on the responses given in the program. The intervention ceprica, as well as the psychoeducational control intervention, aer both delivered via the internet and protected by individually assigned passwords.

This randomised controlled trial will include 306 patients with migraine. Participants will be recruited via a website containing relevant information about the study. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either a control group, in which they continue their usual treatment and receive access to a psychoeducational control intervention, or an intervention group who may also use treatment as usual and in addition receives the online intervention ceprica. Data are collected at baseline (T0) and three months after allocation (T1).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
321

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Hamburg, Germany, 22085
        • GAIA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-65 at the time of screening
  • fulfill diagnostic criteria of migraine (ICD-10: G43.0 or G43.1, confirmed either by upload of a medical document issued by a medical specialist or by a diagnostic phone/video call with a study physician who is experienced in headache diagnostics)
  • age at onset of migraine <50y
  • Migraine is present for at least 12 months at the time of study entry
  • 4-14 migraine headache days per 28 days
  • able and willing to give signed informed consent
  • sufficient language skills in German

Exclusion Criteria:

  • currently receiving preventive migraine medication within 60 days of T0, or planning to start another preventive treatment during the course of the study
  • routinely taking, or planning to take, gepant-type acute migraine medication (e.g., rimegepant)
  • Botulinum toxin A and B administered in the head or neck area within 4 months prior to T0
  • patients with a history of failure to respond to 3 or more classes of migraine preventive treatments with good scientific evidence
  • patients with regular intake of analgesics for other reasons than headache (e.g., chronic back pain, (rheumatoid) arthritis, cancer, injuries/accidents)
  • patients with incomplete headache diaries at baseline (>6 non-consecutive days within 28 days missing)
  • patients with substance use disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Migraine - ceprica
online program: ceprica in addition to treatment as usual
Behavioral: ceprica (additional to treatment as usual)
ceprica is a dialogue-based online psychological intervention for patients with migraine. This intervention includes elements that address pain management, pain reduction etc. Content is adapted to users needs using interactive dialogues, illustrations and audio files. Participants may also continue with their usual treatment.
Other: Migraine - active control intervention
active control intervention: psychoeducation in addition to treatment as usual
Behavioral: active control intervention (additional to treatment as usual)
the active control intervention contains psychoeducational content regarding migraine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of days with migraine headache
Time Frame: 3 months
Change since baseline in migraine headache days per 28 days; assessed via diary
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Migraine-related disability
Time Frame: 3 months
assessed via the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6); scale range from 36-78
3 months
Use of acute migraine medication
Time Frame: 3 months
change from baseline in days with use of acute migraine medication per 28 days; assessed via diary
3 months
Number of moderate/severe headache days
Time Frame: 3 months
Change since baseline in moderate/severe headache days per 28 days; assessed via diary
3 months
Migraine days responder rate
Time Frame: 3 months
Proportion of participants achieving at least 50% reduction from baseline in migraine days
3 months
Headache-related pain intensity
Time Frame: 3 months
assessed via a categorical, four-point verbal rating scale (no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain) on each day of each 28-day diary period
3 months
Functional impairment due to migraine
Time Frame: 3 months
Assessed via the Functional Impairment Scale on each day of the 28-day diary period; scale range: 0-3
3 months
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: 3 months
measured via Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); scale range: 0 to 27
3 months
Anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: 3 months
measured via Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7); scale range: 0 to 21
3 months
Migraine attacks
Time Frame: 3 months
Change since baseline in migraine attacks per 28 days; assessed via diary
3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Healthy lifestyle
Time Frame: 3 months
physical activity, sleep hygiene, healthy diet
3 months
Sociodemographic variables
Time Frame: Baseline Assessment
age, gender, familial status, socioeconomic status, level of education, language ability
Baseline Assessment
Treatment Satisfaction
Time Frame: T1 Assessment
Measured by Net Promoter Score
T1 Assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Gaia AG

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gitta Jacob, PD PhD, GAIA AG

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 20, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 2, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ceprica trial

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Migraine

Clinical Trials on ceprica (additional to treatment as usual)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings