Effectiveness of fESWT in the Treatment of CTS

March 6, 2020 updated by: Richard Crevenna, Medical University of Vienna

The Effectiveness of Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Pilot Study

The carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy in the general population.The focus extracorporeal shock wave (fEWST) is a non invasive treatment for various diseases. FESWT is new and potential treatment for peripheral nerve entrapment/ peripheral neuropathy . But there is still little known about the effects and long term effects of fESWT in the treatment of CTS.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of fESWT in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome compared to participants receiving only night splint. Therefore 40 patients with mild to moderate CTS (verified by nerve conduction velocity) will be randomized to receive either fESWT (1-session a week for 3 weeks) or sham fESWT(1-session a week for 3 weeks). All subjects will be asked to wear night splints.

Evaluation will be performed at baseline (VAS, hand grip, electrodiagnostic parameters, questionnaires), 3 weeks (VAS, hand grip, questionnaires), 12 and 24 weeks (VAS, hand grip, electrodiagnostic parameters, questionnaires) after treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Christina Gesslbauer

Study Locations

  • Austria
      • Vienna, Austria
        • Recruiting
        • Medical University of Vienna, Department of Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- mild to moderate CTS verified by nerve conduction velocity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • metabolic diseases
  • blood clotting problems
  • systemic diseases
  • polyneuropathy
  • chemotherapy during the study
  • corticosteroid therapy
  • use of anticoagulation
  • history of trauma/surgery or nerve lesion of the teated extremity
  • CTS surgery on the affected hand
  • ICD/ pacemaker implantation
  • other therapy for the affected hand during the study
  • acute inflammation or infections
  • severe mental illnesses/psychiatric diseases
  • severe neurological diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Active Comparator
fESWT
Other: focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy
40 Patients with mild to moderate CTS will be randomized to receive either fESWT (1-session a week for 3 weeks) or sham fESWT(1-session a week for 3 weeks). All subjects will be asked to wear night splints.
Other: night splint
40 Patients with mild to moderate CTS will be randomized to receive either fESWT (1-session a week for 3 weeks) or sham fESWT(1-session a week for 3 weeks). All subjects will be asked to wear night splints.
Sham Comparator: Sham Comparator
Sham fESWT
Other: night splint
40 Patients with mild to moderate CTS will be randomized to receive either fESWT (1-session a week for 3 weeks) or sham fESWT(1-session a week for 3 weeks). All subjects will be asked to wear night splints.
Other: sham focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy
40 Patients with mild to moderate CTS will be randomized to receive either fESWT (1-session a week for 3 weeks) or sham fESWT(1-session a week for 3 weeks). All subjects will be asked to wear night splints.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS
Time Frame: baseline, 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment
Visual Analog Scale: Change from baseline of pain 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment.
baseline, 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hand grip strength
Time Frame: baseline, 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment
hand grip strength:
baseline, 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment
distal motor latency of the median nerve
Time Frame: baseline,12th and 24th weeks after treatment

electrophysiological parameter, using nerve conduction velocity to measure distal motor latency and antidromic sensory nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve.

Change from baseline in conduction velocity of median nerve on 12th and 24th weeks after treatment.
baseline,12th and 24th weeks after treatment
sensory conduction velocity of the median nerve
Time Frame: baseline, 12th and 24th weeks after treatment

electrophysiological parameter, using nerve conduction velocity to measure distal motor latency and antidromic sensory nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve.

Change from baseline in conduction velocity of median nerve on 12th and 24th weeks after treatment.
baseline, 12th and 24th weeks after treatment
SF-36
Time Frame: baseline, 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment
36-item Short Form Health Survey: Change from baseline in quality of life 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment.
baseline, 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment
Boston Scale
Time Frame: baseline, 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment
Boston Symptom Severity Score: Change from baseline in severity of symptoms and functional status 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment.
baseline, 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical University of Vienna

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Richard Crevenna, Ao.Univ.-Prof. Dr., MMSc, MBA, Medical University of Vienna, Department of Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 24, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 6, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1080/2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings