Impact of the CareLink Express Remote Monitoring System on Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation

March 8, 2021 updated by: Sergey Mamchur, Research Institute for Complex Problems of Cardiovascular Diseases, Russia

Impact of the CareLink Express Remote Monitoring System on Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients With Implantable Cardiac Pacemakers

The study results will be used to check the hypothesis that CareLink Express remote monitoring system increases the detection rate of asymptomatic AF and allows to change timely the treatment strategy in patients at high risk of thromboembolic events, e.g. anticoagulation therapy onset, electrical cardioversion or/and PVI.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

It is expected to enroll 200 consecutive patients without previously diagnosed AF, who have indications for implantation of dual chamber cardiac pacemakers according to the current guidelines. All the patients will be randomly assigned into 2 groups. Patients in the RM group will undergo the implantation of Ensura DR MRI SureScan pacing system, whereas patients in the control group will receive ADAPTA DR pacing system without RM using. The impact of the Care Link Express service on prevention of thromboembolism will be evaluated. The rate of in-hospital visits for 1 patient per year and compliance with scheduled CareLink transmissions (ratio of the number of the performed transmissions to the planned ones) will be assessed in all patients in the remote monitoring group. Moreover, we are going to estimate the interaction between the follow-up center and other healthcare facilities equipped with the CareLink Express service, which will facilitate faster treatment decision.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Russian Federation
      • Kemerovo, Russian Federation, 650061
        • Recruiting
        • Research Institute for Complex Problems of Cardiovascular Diseases
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with indications for implantation of dual chamber cardiac pacemaker
  • patients with no AF history;
  • written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with contraindications for CIED implantation;
  • patients with previously implanted CIEDs;
  • infection;
  • patients with previously diagnosed AF

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: CareLink Express RM system
Patients in the remote monitoring (RM) group will undergo the implantation of Ensura DR MRI SureScan pacing system. Patients in the RM group should visit the main follow-up clinic 12 weeks after discharge, and then the device data will be remotely transmitted to the CareLink Express Network at least once in 3 months. Research personnel will contact patients by telephone once in 6 months. If participants indicate they have experienced a study outcome event (corresponding to the study endpoints), the event will be recorded. If remote transmission or telephone call data require to make clinical decision an in-hospital visit will be induced.
Other: CareLink Express RM system
CareLink Express remote monitoring system consists of implantable pacemaker CareLink Express station for implanted Medtronic cardiac devices and provides remote data transmissions
Active Comparator: Standard follow-up
Patients in the control group will receive Adapta DR pacing system without remote monitoring using. All patients from the control group should have the first in-hospital visit 12 weeks after pacemaker implantation. Then, the follow-up will be provided according to the standard guidelines
Other: Standard follow-up
Follow-up will be provided according to the standard guidelines (HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): Description of Techniques, Indications, Personnel, Frequency and Ethical Considerations; 2008)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time (days) from the pacemaker system implantation to the first AF episode detected by ESG or EGM
Time Frame: 24 months
the episode should be evaluated by the follow-up clinic physician(s) and meet the appropriate criteria (irregular RR intervals and distinct P waves, ≥30s episode duration)
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
thromboembolic events
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of participants with ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack and thromboembolism (including any arterial embolism and paradoxical embolism)
24 months
hospitalization for cardiovascular events
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of participants with arrhythmia, heart failure decompensation, thromboembolic events
24 months
the number of non-planned induced visits in the follow-up center
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of visits for 1 patient per year
24 months
correction in the medical therapy
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of participants with antiarrhythmic therapy or/and oral anticoagulation therapy initiated after the AF detection
24 months
cardioversion
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of patinents underwent electrical cardioversion
24 months
catheter/surgical PVI
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of patients underwent catheter or surgical atrial fibrillation ablation
24 months
all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of patients dead because of all causes
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Research Institute for Complex Problems of Cardiovascular Diseases, Russia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 21, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 21, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 8, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0546-2015-0017

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings