Impact of the CareLink Express Remote Monitoring System on Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation

Impact of the CareLink Express Remote Monitoring System on Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients With Implantable Cardiac Pacemakers

The study results will be used to check the hypothesis that CareLink Express remote monitoring system increases the detection rate of asymptomatic AF and allows to change timely the treatment strategy in patients at high risk of thromboembolic events, e.g. anticoagulation therapy onset, electrical cardioversion or/and PVI.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

It is expected to enroll 200 consecutive patients without previously diagnosed AF, who have indications for implantation of dual chamber cardiac pacemakers according to the current guidelines. All the patients will be randomly assigned into 2 groups. Patients in the RM group will undergo the implantation of Ensura DR MRI SureScan pacing system, whereas patients in the control group will receive ADAPTA DR pacing system without RM using. The impact of the Care Link Express service on prevention of thromboembolism will be evaluated. The rate of in-hospital visits for 1 patient per year and compliance with scheduled CareLink transmissions (ratio of the number of the performed transmissions to the planned ones) will be assessed in all patients in the remote monitoring group. Moreover, we are going to estimate the interaction between the follow-up center and other healthcare facilities equipped with the CareLink Express service, which will facilitate faster treatment decision.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Kemerovo, Russian Federation, 650061
        • Recruiting
        • Research Institute for Complex Problems of Cardiovascular Diseases
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with indications for implantation of dual chamber cardiac pacemaker
  • patients with no AF history;
  • written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with contraindications for CIED implantation;
  • patients with previously implanted CIEDs;
  • infection;
  • patients with previously diagnosed AF

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CareLink Express RM system
Patients in the remote monitoring (RM) group will undergo the implantation of Ensura DR MRI SureScan pacing system. Patients in the RM group should visit the main follow-up clinic 12 weeks after discharge, and then the device data will be remotely transmitted to the CareLink Express Network at least once in 3 months. Research personnel will contact patients by telephone once in 6 months. If participants indicate they have experienced a study outcome event (corresponding to the study endpoints), the event will be recorded. If remote transmission or telephone call data require to make clinical decision an in-hospital visit will be induced.
CareLink Express remote monitoring system consists of implantable pacemaker CareLink Express station for implanted Medtronic cardiac devices and provides remote data transmissions
Active Comparator: Standard follow-up
Patients in the control group will receive Adapta DR pacing system without remote monitoring using. All patients from the control group should have the first in-hospital visit 12 weeks after pacemaker implantation. Then, the follow-up will be provided according to the standard guidelines
Follow-up will be provided according to the standard guidelines (HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): Description of Techniques, Indications, Personnel, Frequency and Ethical Considerations; 2008)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time (days) from the pacemaker system implantation to the first AF episode detected by ESG or EGM
Time Frame: 24 months
the episode should be evaluated by the follow-up clinic physician(s) and meet the appropriate criteria (irregular RR intervals and distinct P waves, ≥30s episode duration)
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
thromboembolic events
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of participants with ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack and thromboembolism (including any arterial embolism and paradoxical embolism)
24 months
hospitalization for cardiovascular events
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of participants with arrhythmia, heart failure decompensation, thromboembolic events
24 months
the number of non-planned induced visits in the follow-up center
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of visits for 1 patient per year
24 months
correction in the medical therapy
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of participants with antiarrhythmic therapy or/and oral anticoagulation therapy initiated after the AF detection
24 months
cardioversion
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of patinents underwent electrical cardioversion
24 months
catheter/surgical PVI
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of patients underwent catheter or surgical atrial fibrillation ablation
24 months
all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of patients dead because of all causes
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 21, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 21, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on CareLink Express RM system

3
Subscribe