Mindfulness-based Intervention to Promote Psychological Wellbeing in People With Epilepsy

April 27, 2021 updated by: Professor Dr Lim Kheng Seang, University of Malaya

Mindfulness-based Intervention to Promote Psychological Wellbeing in People With Epilepsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The efficacy of mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) for epilepsy has yet to be thoroughly investigated. Hence, the aim of the present study is to examine the effects of MBI on the psychological wellbeing of people with epilepsy (PWE) using a randomized trial design. Key outcomes include depression, anxiety and quality of life. Our primary objective was to evaluate the effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety, depression, epilepsy specific QOL, and life satisfaction in PWE, applying the concept of Reliable Change Index. The secondary objective was to assess whether the results correlate with the level of mindfulness. Study results may be used to decide whether it is worth offering mindfulness training for PWE as an alternative therapy to cope and improve seizure management.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Epilepsy is a debilitating condition characterized by sudden recurrent episodes of epileptic seizures. Psychiatric comorbidities are common in people with epilepsy (PWE), and the presence is associated with increased rates of suicide, healthcare costs, mortality and reduced quality of life. Studies showed that poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has been linked to seizure frequency, medication side effects, psychological disturbances and psychosocial difficulties. Medical therapies aside, psychological interventions like mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) were proven effective in improving psychological health as well as seizure control. Recent review was conducted to determine the efficacy of MBIs for PWE. Although promising results showed reduction in levels of psychological distress and improvement in quality of life, the extracted findings were based on three articles which limit the applicability of the findings. More research focusing on MBIs for PWE are required to make comparisons on its beneficial effects. Hence, this present study aimed to examine the effects of MBI on psychological wellbeing among PWE using a randomized controlled trial design.

This study trial recruits 30 participants with epilepsy. Participants are recruited from the neurology outpatient treatment clinic and those who consented are randomized into either the intervention active or no-intervention group. All participants receive six weekly-sessions of mindfulness training that lasted for 2.5-hour. Assessments are conducted at three time-points (T0: before intervention, T1: immediately after intervention, and T2: at the 6-weeks followup). The following outcome measures assessing depression (BDI-II), anxiety (BAI), quality of life (QOLIE-31), mindfulness (MAAS) and satisfaction with life (SWLS) are collected at all three time-points.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Malaysia
      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 59100
        • University of Malaya

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients (16 years or older) with a diagnosis of epilepsy by a neurologist and who were able to read and write English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a diagnosis of severe learning disability or cognitive impairment that affects individuals who are unable to comply with study procedure, substance dependence, suicidality, and limited language proficiency.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Mindfulness-based therapy
The mindfulness training program included mindfulness meditation practices, self-enquiries, mindful movement as well as understanding of stress physiology and cognitive awareness in the Breathworks/ Paradigm system of mindfulness-based approaches. Participants were enrolled in 5-10-person groups that met weekly for 2-3-hour long sessions for six weeks at the patient's usual follow-up clinic.
Behavioral: Mindfulness-based therapy
Based on randomization, those who first receive the mindfulness training program are the intervention group. Participants would meet weekly for 2-3-hour long sessions for six weeks at the patient's usual follow-up clinic.
Active Comparator: No-Intervention
The control group would attend their routine follow-up visits at the neurology outpatient clinic.
Behavioral: No-intervention
Participants who were randomized into this group would continue to receive their usual follow-up care at the usual neurology outpatient clinic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: Three time-points: T0: (prior to therapy), T1: (immediately after intervention), T2 (three-month after phase one after no-intervention wash-out period)
Total 21 items measuring cognitive, somatic and affective symptoms of anxiety. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale for symptom severity experienced, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (severely). The scores ranged between 0 to 63, with higher numbers suggesting greater degrees of anxiety.
Three time-points: T0: (prior to therapy), T1: (immediately after intervention), T2 (three-month after phase one after no-intervention wash-out period)
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)
Time Frame: Three time-points: T0: (prior to therapy), T1: (immediately after intervention), T2 (three-month after phase one after no-intervention wash-out period)
Total 21 items assessing the presence and severity of depressive symptoms. All descriptive items were scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3. Total scores ranged from 0 to 63, higher scores represent higher degrees of depressive symptoms.
Three time-points: T0: (prior to therapy), T1: (immediately after intervention), T2 (three-month after phase one after no-intervention wash-out period)
Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31)
Time Frame: Three time-points: T0: (prior to therapy), T1: (immediately after intervention), T2 (three-month after phase one after no-intervention wash-out period)
Total 31 items reflects the patient's subjective well-being toward his or her QOL in various aspects related to epilepsy, with higher scores indicating better well-being.
Three time-points: T0: (prior to therapy), T1: (immediately after intervention), T2 (three-month after phase one after no-intervention wash-out period)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
Time Frame: Three time-points: T0: (prior to therapy), T1: (immediately after intervention), T2 (three-month after phase one after no-intervention wash-out period)
Total 15 items were each rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (almost always) to 6 (almost never) to measure the core characteristic of dispositional mindfulness.
Three time-points: T0: (prior to therapy), T1: (immediately after intervention), T2 (three-month after phase one after no-intervention wash-out period)
Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
Time Frame: Three time-points: T0: (prior to therapy), T1: (immediately after intervention), T2 (three-month after phase one after no-intervention wash-out period)
Total 5 items were each rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) to assess one's global cognitive judgements of individual's life satisfaction.
Three time-points: T0: (prior to therapy), T1: (immediately after intervention), T2 (three-month after phase one after no-intervention wash-out period)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Malaya

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Prof. Dr. Lim Kheng Seang, MBBS, PhD, University of Malaya

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 10, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 27, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20175295282

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Diseases

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness-based therapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings