Analytical Validation of the abioSCOPE Device With an IgE Test Panel: Point-of-Care Precision, Sample Type Comparison and Method Correlation

October 1, 2020 updated by: Abionic SA
This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study to evaluate the analytical performance of the Abionic IgE Multi-Allergen Test Panel on the abioSCOPE® device in a U.S. point-of-care environment within a clinical laboratory operating under a CLIA certificate for tests of moderate complexity. The study will assess point-of-care ('external') precision, sample type comparison and correlation with a reference method (Phadia Laboratory System, ThermoFisher Scientific).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20037
        • George Washington University, Washington DC
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21215
        • Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45231
        • The Bernstein Clinical Research Center Cincinnati

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  • A minimum of 20 subjects with targeted levels of total IgE are needed to participate in the Operator-to-Operator whole blood study.
  • A minimum of 20 subjects with targeted levels of allergen-specific and total IgE are needed to participate in the capillary whole blood between-run imprecision study in the POL environment.
  • A minimum of 40 subjects with targeted levels of Fel d 1-specific IgE and total IgE are needed to participate in the sample type comparison study. These subjects will be recruited, and their samples analyzed at 1 POL.
  • A minimum of 300 subjects (approximately 100 subjects enrolled and evaluated at each of three sites) and with targeted levels of total IgE are needed to participate in the method comparison study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision and understanding of signed and dated written informed consent by the subject prior to any mandatory study-specific procedures, sample collection, or analysis.
  • Male or female, 18 years of age or older.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject participating in another study that may influence test results.
  • Subject taking any of the following medications: systemic steroids (inhaled or nasal steroids are allowed), anti-cytokines or cytokines, systemic interferon (injection local interferon α for the treatment of HPV is allowed), anti-IgE therapy (approved or investigational) or treated with systemic chemotherapy.
  • History of cancer, autoimmune, or immune deficiency disease.
  • Suffering from a hematological pathology (coagulation disorder, severe anemia) that could interfere with the blood draw procedure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Interventions
  • A minimum of 20 subjects with targeted levels of total IgE are needed to participate in the Operator-to-Operator whole blood study.
  • A minimum of 20 subjects with targeted levels of allergen-specific and total IgE are needed to participate in the capillary whole blood between-run imprecision study in the POL environment.
  • A minimum of 40 subjects with targeted levels of Fel d 1-specific IgE and total IgE are needed to participate in the sample type comparison study. These subjects will be recruited, and their samples analyzed at 1 POL.
  • A minimum of 300 subjects (approximately 100 subjects enrolled and evaluated at each of three sites) and with targeted levels of total IgE are needed to participate in the method comparison study.
Device: Blood Collection

Between-Run Reproducibility K3-EDTA venous whole blood 3 mL 1 venous draw

Operator-to-operator imprecision (abioSCOPE) K3-EDTA capillary whole blood 0.05 mL/draw; 0.15 mL total 3 finger sticks (3 different fingers)

Sample type comparison (abioSCOPE) K3-EDTA capillary whole blood, venous serum, venous K3-EDTA plasma 0.35 mL (finger stick), 9 mL of whole blood to get a minimum of 3 mL of serum and 9 mL of whole blood K3-EDTA to get a minimum of 3 mL of plasma 1 finger stick; 1 venous draw into serum tube (9 mL) and 1 venous draw into K3-EDTA plasma tube (9 mL), in total 18 mL

Method comparison (abioSCOPE and ImmunoCAP/Phadia) K3-EDTA capillary whole blood, venous K3-EDTA plasma 0.05 mL (finger stick), 9 mL of whole blood to get a minimum of 3 ml of plasma 1 finger stick; 1 venous draw into K3-EDTA plasma tube (9 mL tube)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
POC variance components (in a POL environment):
Time Frame: Day 1
  • External Precision Study ('reproducibility study' 'site-to-site precision study'): Demonstrate that the imprecision of K3-EDTA venous plasma using the IVD CAPSULE Allergic Asthma panel on the abioSCOPE device (all 5 allergens/allergen mixes and total IgE) in the hands of trained Healthcare Professionals in a Physician Office Laboratory (POL) is within the expected range of the imprecision established in the clinical laboratory by Laboratory Scientists.
  • Operator-to-Operator imprecision on whole blood: Demonstrate that the between-Operator reproducibility of the total IgE of the IVD CAPSULE Allergic Asthma panel on the abioSCOPE device test results is within the expected range of variability.
  • Between-run reproducibility: Demonstrate that the between-run reproducibility of venous whole blood samples measured with the IVD CAPSULE Allergic Asthma panel on the abioSCOPE device (all 5 allergens/allergen mixes and total IgE) is within the expected range of variability.
Day 1
Sample type comparison:
Time Frame: Day 1
Demonstrate that the IVD CAPSULE Allergic Asthma panel on the abioSCOPE device test results obtained from capillary whole blood correlates well with values obtained from K3-EDTA anticoagulated venous plasma and serum samples.
Day 1
Method comparison
Time Frame: Day 1
Demonstrate that test results obtained with the total IgE test of the IVD CAPSULE Allergic Asthma panel on the abioSCOPE device correlates with total IgE test results from the reference method (Phadia Laboratory System, ThermoFisher Scientific).
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Abionic SA

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Johns Hopkins University
NAMSA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 1, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AB-ALL-3.1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Allergy

Clinical Trials on Blood Collection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings