The SQUID Trial for the Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery for Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (STEM) (STEM)

June 2, 2026 updated by: Balt USA
STEM Study is a pivotal, international, multi-center, prospective, randomized (1:1) controlled trial designed to provide an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) embolization with SQUID for the management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH)

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study objective is to provide an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) embolization with SQUID for the management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

319

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Caen, France, 14000
        • CHU Côte de Nacre
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 94275
        • CHU Hopital Bicetre
      • Paris, France
        • Hopital Pitie Salpetriere
      • Reims, France
        • CHU Hopital Maison Blanche
      • Heidelberg, Germany
        • UniversitatsKlinikum Heidelberg
      • Nuremberg, Germany
        • Klinikum Nurnberg Sud
      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Gregorio Maranon Hospital
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85013
        • Barrow Neurological Institute
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85711
        • Carondolet St. Joseph's
    • California
      • Riverside, California, United States, 92501
        • Riverside Community Hospital
      • Santa Barbara, California, United States, 93105
        • Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital
      • Thousand Oaks, California, United States, 92360
        • Los Robles Hospital and Medical Center
    • Colorado
      • Englewood, Colorado, United States, 80113
        • Swedish Medical Center
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207
        • Baptist Health
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University
      • Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30060
        • Wellstar Kennestone Hospital
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University of Kansas
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins Medicine
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68106
        • Nebraska Health
    • New Jersey
      • Summit, New Jersey, United States, 07901
        • Overlook Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • NYU Langone Health
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook University
      • The Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montefiore Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Danville, Pennsylvania, United States, 17822
        • Geisinger Medical Center
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17918
        • Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Rhode Island Hospital
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38120
        • Baptist Memorial Hospital
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38104
        • Methodist University Hospital
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98122
        • Swedish Cherry Hill
    • West Virginia
      • Morgantown, West Virginia, United States, 26506
        • West Virginia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

26 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female Subject whose age is ≥ 30 at the time of consent
  2. Pre-morbid mRS (Modified Rankin Scale) 0-1 within the previous 12 months
  3. cSDH measures ≥ 10 mm in greatest thickness
  4. cSDH exerts mass effect upon the subjacent brain, as indicated by local cortical flattening or midline shift
  5. Imaging characteristics indicative of chronicity (≥ 50% of the volume of the collection should be isodense or hypodense to normal cortical gray matter on Computed Tomography (CT))
  6. Subject presents with one or more of the following neurological symptoms: headache; cognitive decline; speech difficulty or aphasia; gait impairment or imbalance; focal neurological deficit (weakness, paresthesia or sensory deficit involving of one or more extremities or facial droop); and/or seizure
  7. Subject, or his/her legally authorized representative, understands the nature of the procedure, consents to participation in the study and provides a signed Informed Consent Form
  8. Female Subjects of child-bearing potential must be able to provide a current negative urine pregnancy test and agree to an appropriate method of contraception throughout the trial
  9. Subject is able and willing to return to the investigational site for all follow-up visits (e.g., 30-day, 90-day, 180-day and 1-year), as required per protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject with prior ipsilateral craniotomy or burr hole evacuation of cSDH
  2. Subject with prior Embolization of either MMA
  3. Subject requires (in the opinion of the treating surgeon) a full or mini craniotomy
  4. Subject with urgent or emergent (within 1 hour of assessment) subdural hematoma evacuation needed
  5. Subject with a cSDH with a focal location (confined to the frontal or temporal base or the inter-hemispheric space without cerebral convexity involvement)
  6. cSDH developed due to underlying condition such as a vascular lesion, brain tumor, arachnoid cyst, spontaneous intracranial hypotension or secondary to a previous craniotomy
  7. Life expectancy of <1 year
  8. Subject who presents with an intracranial mass other than subdural hematoma
  9. Subject who presents with a meningioma with mass effect and/or ≥1 cm or currently undergoing radiation therapy for carcinoma or sarcoma of the head or neck region
  10. Subject with serum creatinine level > 3.0 mg/dL at time of enrollment (this will restrict the use of contrast) and not on dialysis
  11. Subject with significant liver function impairment at the time of enrollment
  12. Subject with a life-threatening allergy to radiographic contrast (unless treatment for allergy is tolerated or can be managed medically)
  13. Subject who is currently enrolled in another investigational study protocol that could potentially confound the current study endpoints

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SQUID
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA)
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent
Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery using the SQUID non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and the surgical of the sub-dural hematoma
Active Comparator: No Embolization

Standard Management

For subjects in the surgery only group (i.e., surgical management but no adjunctive MMAE), the surgical evacuation was to occur within 48 hours of randomization. Surgery included hemorrhage evacuation through one or two burr-holes with irrigation of the hematoma (and the option for placement of a subgaleal or subdural drain) or twist-drill drainage, such as Subdural Evacuating Port System.

Subjects in the non-surgical management alone group were followed by the clinical team and treated as per the standard of care (SOC) established at the institution for the management of cSDH. Standard of care typically included cSDH monitoring, medical intervention to control symptoms, reversal or cessation of anti-coagulant and anti-platelet medications as well as the administration of anti-inflammatory medications (e.g., steroids, statins).

Surgical evacuation of the sub-dural hematoma
Standard Medical Management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint-Number of Participants With Treatment Failure
Time Frame: On 180-day from intervention

Treatment failure as defined by the occurrence of any of the following events:

  1. Residual or re-accumulation of the SDH (≥10 mm) on 180-day scan from intervention.
  2. Re-operation (after index procedure) or surgical rescue within 180-days of intervention.
  3. Any new, major disabling stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or death from any (neurological) cause within 180-days of intervention.
On 180-day from intervention
Primary Safety Endpoint-Number of Participants With Major Disabling Stroke or Any Death Within 30 Days of Intervention
Time Frame: Within 30-days from intervention
Major disabling stroke or any death within 30-days from intervention.
Within 30-days from intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Any Investigational Device/MMAE Procedure-related AE/SAE
Time Frame: Through 1-year visit
Number of participants with an adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE) adjudicated as probably or causally related to the investigational device or Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE) procedure.
Through 1-year visit
mRS Shift Analysis at 180-day Visit
Time Frame: 180-day from intervention

The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is an ordinal scale used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke. Scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death):

0: No symptoms

  1. No significant disability
  2. Slight disability
  3. Moderate disability
  4. Moderately severe disability
  5. Severe disability
  6. Dead The Shift Analysis (also known as an ordinal analysis) evaluates the distribution of mRS scores to identify a general improvement or 'shift' across the entire range of the scale, rather than just comparing 'good' vs. 'poor' outcomes.
180-day from intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mRS ≤ 2 (Binary)
Time Frame: 180 days

The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a clinician-reported measure used to assess the degree of functional disability or dependence in daily activities following a neurological event. This binary outcome dichotomizes the 7-point scale (0-6) into two categories: Favorable Outcome (mRS 0-2) and Unfavorable Outcome (mRS 3-6).

A score of ≤ 2 signifies that the participant is functionally independent and capable of looking after their own affairs without assistance. Results will be reported as the proportion of participants in each treatment arm achieving a score of 0, 1, or 2 at the 180-day follow-up.

180 days
Global Neurocognitive Performance
Time Frame: Baseline and 180 Days
T-scores were used to convert raw data to standardized scale with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A higher T-score indicates better cognitive performance (a score near 40 indicates a low average to average range). Global neurocognitive performance was assessed by taking the mean T-score for all individual neurocognitive markers (Hopkins Verbal Learning Tests (HVLT-R), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), Animal Naming, and Trail making tests).
Baseline and 180 Days
EQ-5D-5L (Including EQ-VAS) Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 180-day change from Baseline
The EQ VAS is a 20 cm vertical visual analogue scale that records the patient's self-rated health today. It ranges from 0 (Worst health you can imagine) to 100 (Best health you can imagine).
180-day change from Baseline
EQ-5D-5L Index
Time Frame: 180 day change from Baseline
The EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol - 5 Dimension - 5 Level) is a standardized, patient-reported instrument used globally to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It assesses health across 5 dimensions-mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression-with 5 levels of severity. The index score ranges from -0.59 to 1.0, where 1.0 represents 'full health' and 0.0 represents death. A higher score indicates a better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as (180-Day score minus Baseline score)
180 day change from Baseline
Hospital Days
Time Frame: Through 180 days
The number of days (mean) in hospital from baseline through 180 days.
Through 180 days
NIHSS
Time Frame: 90-day Change from Baseline

The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a standardized tool used to objectively quantify the neurological impairment caused by a stroke. It consists of 15 items assessing areas such as level of consciousness, vision, motor function, sensation, and language.

Score Range: Total scores range from 0 to 42. Interpretation: A score of 0 indicates normal function (no symptoms), while higher scores indicate more severe neurological deficit.

This outcome measures the mean change in the total NIHSS score from baseline (at enrollment) to the 90-day follow-up

90-day Change from Baseline
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Days
Time Frame: 180 days
The total number of ICU days from baseline through 180 days.
180 days
Imaging Core Lab Assessments (cSDH Thickness and Midline Shift)
Time Frame: 180 days Change from Baseline
Core Lab Analysis of CT/MRI Images. The thickness of the cSDH was documented separately for the left and right sides.
180 days Change from Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Fiorella, MD, PhD, Stony Brook University Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Adam Arthur, MD, MPH, Semmes-Murphy Neurologic and Spine Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CIP-201912-SQUID

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subdural Hematoma, Chronic

Clinical Trials on SQUID Embolization

Search Similar Trials