Influence of Manipulation of Oocytes and Embryos in Low Oxygen Tension on Assisted Reproduction Technology Outcome

May 21, 2021 updated by: The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital

Nowadays, most assisted reproduction laboratories attempt to maintain as much as possible ex vivo culture conditions comparable to those in vivo. Various culturing condition such as temperature and pH parameters have been adjusted according to in vivo values in order to improve in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. Embryos of most mammals, including that of humans, are not exposed to oxygen concentration higher than 8%. Thus, embryos and gametes should be kept in a low oxygen environment during manipulation in assisted reproduction treatment.

Culturing embryos in low oxygen concentrations is now a general practice in IVF laboratories. However, there are still laboratory procedures when the oocytes/embryos are exposed to atmospheric oxygen. In most laboratories, oocytes retrieval is performed under atmospheric oxygen concentration. Oocyte is very sensitive to environmental changes, for instance, transient cooling to room temperature can cause irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in human oocytes and oocyte in vitro maturation can lead to the decline of energy metabolism in human oocytes. Whether oocyte exposed to atmospheric oxygen during oocyte retrieval has detrimental effect on embryo development and IVF outcomes is unknown.

Previous studies showed that low oxygen tension during embryo culture improved implantation rate and clinical outcomes, but embryo quality was not affected. In other studies, embryo quality was improved but overall pregnancy was not affected. The reason for the discrepancies could be because the oxygen tension during oocyte/embryo manipulation was not under well control. For instance, oocyte retrieval, fertilization check and embryo grading were performed under atmospheric oxygen. It is difficult to predict how these factors negatively impact the IVF outcomes.

In this project, the investigators hypothesize that lower oxygen tension during oocyte/embryo manipulation improves IVF outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In the experimental group, oocyte pickup will be performed in a lower oxygen tension environment (5% oxygen, 89% nitrogen, 6% carbon dioxide); oocyte pickup will be performed in a special workstation with reduced oxygen tension environment while fertilization check and embryo grading will be performed in conventional and time lapse embryo culture system. The time lapse culture system can provide a constant lower oxygen tension culture environment to the embryos. In the control group, oocyte pickup, fertilization check and embryo grading will be performed in atmospheric oxygen environment. Under this arrangement, the difference between the 2 groups is the oxygen tension during oocyte/embryo manipulation. The investigators believe that a solid conclusion can be drawn about whether lower oxygen tension environment can benefit IVF outcomes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1160

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all the couples undergoing conventional IVF cycle in the reproductive medicine center of the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle
  • Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycle
  • cycle with fertilization failure ≥3
  • cycle using sperm from percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA)/testicular sperm extraction (TESE) or cryopreserved sperm
  • cycle using cryopreserved oocyte
  • cycle with no oocyte retrieved

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
NO_INTERVENTION: 20% O2
In the control group, oocyte pickup will be performed in atmospheric oxygen environment (20% oxygen, 89% nitrogen, 6% carbon dioxide).
EXPERIMENTAL: 5% O2
In the experimental group, oocyte pickup will be performed in a low oxygen tension environment (5% oxygen, 89% nitrogen, 6% carbon dioxide). If time lapse embryo culture system is used, fertilization check and embryo grading will also be conducted under the low oxygen tension environment.
Biological: 5% O2
5% oxygen will be used during oocyte retrieval, fertilization check and embryo grading

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
live birth rate
Time Frame: 4 years
delivery of a live birth beyond 24 weeks of gestation
4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
clinical pregnancy rate
Time Frame: 3 years
presence of at least one gestational sac on ultrasound of 6 weeks
3 years
ongoing pregnancy rate
Time Frame: 3 years
presence of at least heart pulsation on ultrasound beyond 20 weeks
3 years
fertilization rate
Time Frame: 3 years
No. of fertilized oocyte divided by No. of inseminated cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs)
3 years
cleavage rate
Time Frame: 3 years
No. of cleaved embryo divided by No. of fertilized oocyte
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Shubiu Yeung, PhD, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 22, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 21, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HKUSZH201902022

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Embryo Hypoxia

Clinical Trials on 5% O2

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings