Standard or Convalescent Plasma in Patients With Recent Onset of COVID-19 Respiratory Failure (PLACO-COVID)

February 21, 2022 updated by: Paola Maria Manzini, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Effectiveness of Adding Standard Plasma or COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma to Standard Treatment, Versus Standard Treatment Alone, in Patients With Recent Onset of COVID-19 Respiratory Failure. A Randomized, Three-arms, Phase 2 Trial

To date no specific treatment has been proven to be effective for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) infection. It is possible that convalescent plasma that contains antibodies to SARS-Cov-2 might be effective against the progression of infection. Promising results have been shown by preliminary data from China cases. The investigators planned to compare effectiveness of adding COVID-19 convalescent plasma to standard therapy protocol (STP) versus adding plasma donated in pre-COVID era versus STP alone in patient with COVID-19 within 5 days from the onset of respiratory distress. STP at enrolment is the best evidence based therapy approved for treatment of COVID patients by regional Health system emergency committee.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

500-700 ml of Plasma will be collected by apheresis from COVID recovered donors showing the presence of neutralizing antibodies to SARS-Cov-2 (anti-SARS-Cov-2). All plasma will be screened for transmissible diseases according to italian law (Hepatitis B Virus,Hepatitis C Virus, Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1-2, Syphilis) plus adjunctive screening for Hepatitis A Virus and Hepatitis E Virus-RNA and Parvovirus B19-DNA as requested from Italian National Blood Authority. Apheresis will be divided in two/three units (170-300 ml each), virus inactivated with Riboflavin and ultraviolet light illumination technology and immediately frozen and stored separately from other plasma bags.

Enrolled patients will be stratified according to severity of respiratory failure and randomized in three arms: 1) Standard Therapy Protocol (STP), 2) Standard Therapy Protocol + 170-350 ml standard Plasma (SP) on day 1-3-5 after randomization, 3) Standard Therapy Protocol + 170-350 ml COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma on day 1-3-5 after randomization.

The three therapeutic units of COVID-19 Convalescent plasma will be chosen in order to minimize variations among patients in the total amount of infused SARS-Cov-2 antibodies.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
180

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Torino, Italy, 10126
        • AO Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed SARS-Cov-2 diagnosis by RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swab or on bronchoalveolar lavage
  • Respiratory failure onset or progression within 5 days
  • Signed Informed Consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Previous severe reactions to plasma transfusion
  • Unavailability of blood group compatible COVID-19 convalescent plasma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard therapy protocol (STP)
STP is defined as the best evidence based therapy approved for treatment of COVID-19 patients by Regional Health System emergency committee. STP could be updated during the trial.
Drug: Standard Therapy Protocol (STP)
Standard Therapy Protocol according to the best evidence treatment recommended by the Regional Health System emergency committee
EXPERIMENTAL: STP + Standard Plasma (SP)
STP + 3 units on day 1-3-5 of Standard Plasma collected in pre-COVID era (January-September 2019)
Drug: Standard Therapy Protocol (STP)
Standard Therapy Protocol according to the best evidence treatment recommended by the Regional Health System emergency committee
Other: STP + Standard Plasma (SP)
Transfusion of three Standard Plasma Units (SP) on day 1,3,5 in addition to STP
EXPERIMENTAL: STP + COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma (CP)
STP + 3 units on day 1-3-5 of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma containing neutralizing SARS-Cov-2 antibodies
Drug: Standard Therapy Protocol (STP)
Standard Therapy Protocol according to the best evidence treatment recommended by the Regional Health System emergency committee
Other: STP + COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma (CP)
Transfusion of three SARS-Cov-2 neutralizing antibodies positive Plasma Units (CP) on day 1,3,5 in addition to STP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30-days survival
Time Frame: 30 days after randomization
Proportion of patients alive 30 days after randomization
30 days after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ventilator free survival
Time Frame: 30 days after randomization
Cumulative incidence of mechanical ventilation or death
30 days after randomization
6-months survival
Time Frame: 6 months after randomization
Probability of being alive at 6 months after randomization
6 months after randomization
Incidence of complications
Time Frame: Within 12 months
Proportion of patients developing any serious medical or procedure related complications
Within 12 months
Days in intensive care units (ICU)
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months
Proportion of days spent in ICU on the total length of hospital stay
From date of randomization until the date of discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months
Positivity for Immunoglobulin G to SARS-Cov-2
Time Frame: On day 0, 2, 4, 6,10,14, 21, 28 after randomization and at date of discharge or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months
Proportion of patients showing seroconversion to Immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-SARS-Cov-2
On day 0, 2, 4, 6,10,14, 21, 28 after randomization and at date of discharge or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months
Clearance of viral load
Time Frame: On day 0, 2, 4, 6,10,14, 21, 28 after randomization and at date of discharge or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months
Proportion of patients showing viral clearance by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) on plasma and respiratory tract samples
On day 0, 2, 4, 6,10,14, 21, 28 after randomization and at date of discharge or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score
Time Frame: On day 0, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 28 after randomization and at date of discharge or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months
Variations in SOFA Score (range 0-24; higher score mean a worse outcome)
On day 0, 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 28 after randomization and at date of discharge or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months
Any variation from Standard Therapy Protocol
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed daily up to 2 months
Proportion of patients needing introduction of new drug or discontinuation of drug from standard therapy protocol
From date of randomization until the date of discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed daily up to 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Paola Maria Manzini, MD, AO Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 15, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 10, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 21, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CS3/33

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All Individual Participant Data requests should be submitted to the corresponding author for consideration. Access to deidentified participant data may be granted following review, after the publication of major results

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available after 12 months from study ending and for the following 5 years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data requests should be submitted to the corresponding author for consideration.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on Standard Therapy Protocol (STP)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings