Virtual Reality in Lower Limb Adult Burn (adultburn)

December 16, 2020 updated by: Maged Basha, Qassim University

Efficacy of Wii Fit Training on Lower Limb Burn in Adults

To investigate the potential effects of Wii fit rehabilitation programs on functional capacity, mobility, balance and muscle strength in lower limb burn patients after hospital discharge.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The use of virtual reality technology in burn conditions improved joint flexibility and reduced pain associated with physical therapy, dressing changes, and wound debridement. However, the primary concern of burn rehabilitation is not only survival but also maximizing functional outcome and decreasing the time for return to work.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult with a deep partial thickness or a full thickness burn in the lower extremities.
  • induced by either a scaled or a flame thermal burn.
  • total body surface area (TBSA) more than 40%.
  • age ranged from 18 to 40 years.
  • recent hospital discharge.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infection.
  • Diabetes.
  • inhalation injury.
  • Fracture.
  • degenerative joint diseases of the lower extremities.
  • peripheral nerve diseases.
  • Pre-established psychologically and physically disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Wii Fit Group
Received Standard of care and Wii Fit protocol consisted of strength, balance, and aerobic programs that were performed on the Wii Fit balance board (Nintendo Inc., Kyoto, Japan). For muscle strengthening exercise, lunges, single-leg extensions, sideways leg lifts, single leg twists, and rowing squats were performed. For exercise that enhances balancing sense, the soccer heading, ski slalom, penguin, table tilt, and balance bubble games were used. Aerobic games as hula hoop, super hula hoop and basic step.
Wii Fit balance board (Nintendo Inc., Kyoto, Japan).
Other Names:
  • interactive video games
physical therapy and occupational therapy exercises either at their own home or a gym
Other Names:
  • routine physical therapy protocol
Other: Standard of care group
On discharge from the hospital, patients in the SOC group were given instructions on how to perform physical therapy and occupational therapy exercises after discharge. After education, patients could perform the physical therapy and occupational therapy exercises either at their own home or a gym.
physical therapy and occupational therapy exercises either at their own home or a gym
Other Names:
  • routine physical therapy protocol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
high mobility assessment tool
Time Frame: at baseline
used to assess mobility assessment after burn injuries. It is a valid and reliable unidimensional assessment tool which includes nine functional tasks, where 0 = inability to do and 4= able to do extremely well, with a total score of 54. Each Functional task is rated on a five-point performance scale with higher scores indicate a higher level of performance
at baseline
high mobility assessment tool
Time Frame: after 12 weeks
used to assess mobility assessment after burn injuries. It is a valid and reliable unidimensional assessment tool which includes nine functional tasks, where 0 = inability to do and 4= able to do extremely well, with a total score of 54. Each Functional task is rated on a five-point performance scale with higher scores indicate a higher level of performance
after 12 weeks
Lower Limb Functional Index
Time Frame: at baseline
a valid and reliable patient self-reported questionnaire to assess lower limb function for patients with a burn injury. It is consisted of fifteen general and ten lower-limb specific items that assess the functional status of the patients during the last 2-3 days. The scoring options for the LLFI Items are Yes=1 point, Somewhat= 0.5 point and No= 0 point. The scoring points are added and then multiplied by four for a total score of functional limitation. The total score of the LLFI ranges from 0 (maximum limitation) to 100 (no limitation or normal functional status)
at baseline
Lower Limb Functional Index
Time Frame: after 12 weeks
a valid and reliable patient self-reported questionnaire to assess lower limb function for patients with a burn injury. It is consisted of fifteen general and ten lower-limb specific items that assess the functional status of the patients during the last 2-3 days. The scoring options for the LLFI Items are Yes=1 point, Somewhat= 0.5 point and No= 0 point. The scoring points are added and then multiplied by four for a total score of functional limitation. The total score of the LLFI ranges from 0 (maximum limitation) to 100 (no limitation or normal functional status)
after 12 weeks
Timed-up and go test
Time Frame: at baseline
used to evaluate functional mobility of the patients that requires both static and dynamic balance. The TUG test is a basic mobility assessment tool which records the time taken to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, return and sit down on the chair. The TUG test was performed with a standardized instruction, asking patients to walk as fast as possible during the test. All participants performed the TUG test from a standard chair (seat height of approximately 46 cm) with back support and no arms
at baseline
Timed-up and go test
Time Frame: after 12 weeks
used to evaluate functional mobility of the patients that requires both static and dynamic balance. The TUG test is a basic mobility assessment tool which records the time taken to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, return and sit down on the chair. The TUG test was performed with a standardized instruction, asking patients to walk as fast as possible during the test. All participants performed the TUG test from a standard chair (seat height of approximately 46 cm) with back support and no arms
after 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The six-minute walk test
Time Frame: at baseline
used to assess functional exercise capacity of the participants. The 6-MWT was performed in a 30-meters flat corridor according to the American Thoracic Society guidelines. Patients were asked to walk as far as possible in the 30-m corridor during the 6-min period. Standardized verbal encouragement is given to the patients during the 6-MWT. At the end of the test, the walking distance was measured. The predicted values of 6-MWT were calculated according to age and gender
at baseline
The six-minute walk test
Time Frame: after 12 weeks
used to assess functional exercise capacity of the participants. The 6-MWT was performed in a 30-meters flat corridor according to the American Thoracic Society guidelines. Patients were asked to walk as far as possible in the 30-m corridor during the 6-min period. Standardized verbal encouragement is given to the patients during the 6-MWT. At the end of the test, the walking distance was measured. The predicted values of 6-MWT were calculated according to age and gender
after 12 weeks
Isokinetic Muscle Strength Assessment
Time Frame: at baseline
assessed by A Biodex dynamometer (Biodex Medical System, Shirley, NY, USA). The values of knee flexors and extensors muscle peak torque of dominant leg were measured regardless the location of burns at an angular velocity of 150°/seconds, hip angle of 100° and patient were supported with a securing belt placed over the mid- thigh, pelvis and trunk. Three sub-maximal repetitions were allowed for the patient without any load as a warm-up. The patient then carried out 10 of maximum voluntary muscle contractions continuously without rest and the highest values were recorded for analysis.
at baseline
Isokinetic Muscle Strength Assessment
Time Frame: after 12 weeks
assessed by A Biodex dynamometer (Biodex Medical System, Shirley, NY, USA). The values of knee flexors and extensors muscle peak torque of dominant leg were measured regardless the location of burns at an angular velocity of 150°/seconds, hip angle of 100° and patient were supported with a securing belt placed over the mid- thigh, pelvis and trunk. Three sub-maximal repetitions were allowed for the patient without any load as a warm-up. The patient then carried out 10 of maximum voluntary muscle contractions continuously without rest and the highest values were recorded for analysis.
after 12 weeks
Stability Index
Time Frame: at baseline
assessed by A Biodex Balance System (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY) which consists of a movable balance platform that provides 20° surface tilt through 360° range of motion. The platform interfaces with computer software that enables the device to serve as an objective assessment of balance. All measurements were performed at level eight of stability, and the test duration was set at 20 seconds for three successive trials.
at baseline
Stability Index
Time Frame: after 12 weeks
assessed by A Biodex Balance System (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY) which consists of a movable balance platform that provides 20° surface tilt through 360° range of motion. The platform interfaces with computer software that enables the device to serve as an objective assessment of balance. All measurements were performed at level eight of stability, and the test duration was set at 20 seconds for three successive trials.
after 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maged Basha, Qassim University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2657PT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

IPD will be available upon reasonable request by email from the main author after revising the requester qualification relevance to the topic of the study and approval of all co-authors within 1 month of receiving the request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burns

Clinical Trials on virtual reality

Subscribe