The Risk of HIV Acquisition Among Traditional Healers in South Africa

June 14, 2024 updated by: Carolyn Audet, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

The Risk of HIV Acquisition Among Traditional Healers in South Africa: Implementing Novel Strategies to Improve Protective Behaviors

Traditional healers, community-based partners with the national health system of South Africa, are exposed to patient blood an average of 1,500 times during their careers due to the practice of delivering herbal remedies via herbs rubbed into dozens of sub-cutaneous cuts. The purpose of this proposal is to compare two implementation strategies to increase consistent use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): (1) a health care worker provided training program followed by 3 educational outreach and coaching visits at the healer's place of practice vs. (2) a training and educational outreach initiative led by a team of health care workers and healers who adopted and use PPE on their own (early adopters) to assess their effects on exposure to patient blood. With an HIV prevalence among healers well above that in the baseline population (30% vs. 19%) and HIV prevalence of 59% among those exposed to patient blood, this study will allow the investigators to test a novel implementation strategy for delivering PPE training to prevent new HIV infections among a newly identified high-risk population in a region with the world's highest HIV prevalence.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In South Africa there are an estimated 200,000 traditional healers providing health services. Like allopathic health care workers (HCW), traditional healers are exposed to bloodborne pathogens through the widespread practice of traditional "injections", where healers perform dozens of subcutaneous incisions to rub herbs directly into the bloodied skin. 98 percent of healers perform these treatments; they experience an average of 1,500 blood exposures over the course of their lifetime. This high frequency of blood exposure, coupled with treating high-risk patients, can result in an increased risk of patient-to-healer disease transmission if personal protective equipment (PPE) are not used. Healers in South Africa who reported patient blood touched their skin had 2.59 times higher risk of being HIV-positive than those with no exposure (59% vs. 25%); overall healers have a substantially higher HIV prevalence (30%) than the general population (19%).

Free PPE are made available at local health facilities, but most healers have low levels of literacy, limited ability to assess blood exposure risk, and have no PPE training. Given these limitations, use of PPE during treatments is inconsistent. A small proportion of healers employ PPE appropriately during each treatment; these "early adopter" healers suggest PPE use is sustainable in rural sub-Saharan Africa if a healer has the necessary skills, risk assessment training, and encouragement. This proposal compares two implementation strategies to increase PPE use during procedures and decrease the number of injections performed: (1) HCW led education on risk of blood exposure and development of PPE donning, use and doffing skills through a week-long training followed by 3 educational outreach visits at the healer's place of practice vs. (2) "Early adopter" healer and HCW co-led week-long training followed by 3 educational outreach visits. The investigators hypothesize that the strategy of engaging "early adopter" healers as trainers will lead to more accurate participant risk assessments, increase participant self-efficacy, and lead to more consistent use of PPE during treatments.

The Specific Aims of this study are to:

  1. Adapt PPE training using the "ADAPT-ITT" model;
  2. Compare fidelity of PPE training between the HCW-only team versus the healer + HCW team;
  3. Compare the effects of two implementation strategies on healer exposure to patient blood.

This potentially high-impact intervention is well-suited to the R21 mechanism. While some allopathic providers may recommend an outright ban on the procedure, patients and healers have strongly believed in the efficacy of these treatments for hundreds of years- they are not likely to stop because of a Department of Health recommendation. It is up healthcare workers and governments to overcome their own biases to develop an effective strategy to prevent HIV seroconversion. The team of South African and U.S. investigators has a proven record of HIV research success and specific experience successfully engaging traditional healers, HIV prevention studies, as well as, dissemination and implementation research.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
136

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Traditional healers > 18 years of age, who are registered as traditional healers with the government of South Africa, are currently practicing in the Bushbuckridge area, and conduct traditional vaccinations.
  2. Biomedical practitioners > 18 years of age, who are currently providing health care services to patients at government or private health facilities in Bushbuckridge. '
  3. Community members > 18 years of age, who currently live in Bushbuckridge and sought health care services from a traditional healer in the past year.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Traditional healers <18 years of age, who are not registered as traditional healers with the government of South Africa, are not currently practicing, or do not conduct traditional vaccinations on their patients.
  2. Biomedical practitioners < 18 years of age or who are not currently providing health services in the Bushbuckridge area.
  3. Community members < 18 years of age or who do not seek health care services from traditional healers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Clinician Training
Traditional healers randomized to the control arm will receive PPE education and training, general HIV prevention education and skill building (including condom use, positive prevention, and pre-/post-exposure prophylaxis services), and three educational outreach and coaching visits at the healer's place of practice to provide on-the-ground advice and support for PPE use. All training will be provided by trained medical personnel.
Behavioral: Education and Training by Clinicians
Training in the use of PPE and education about the risks of blood exposure.
Experimental: Healer + Clinician Training
Traditional healers randomized to the intervention arm will receive PPE education and training, general HIV prevention education and skill building (including condom use, positive prevention, and pre-/post-exposure prophylaxis services), and three educational outreach and coaching visits at the healer's place of practice to provide on-the-ground advice and support for PPE use. All training will be provided by both healers who already use PPE regularly and trained medical personnel.
Behavioral: Training and Education from Traditional Healers and Clinicians
Training in the use of PPE and education about the risks of blood exposure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood Exposure
Time Frame: 7 months
Number of Glove Pairs Used Per Razor Blade Used
7 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
University of Witwatersrand, South Africa

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Carolyn M Audet, PhD, Vanderbilt University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 25, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 25, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 14, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R21AI150302 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • R21AI150302-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Education and Training by Clinicians

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings