Application of Lactobacillus Salivarius CECT5713 in Infertility of Unknown Origin

June 25, 2020 updated by: Juan M. Rodríguez, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Application of Lactobacillus Salivarius CECT5713 to Achieve Term Pregnancies in Women With Repetitive Abortion or Infertility of Unknown Origin by Microbiological and Immunological Modulation of the Vaginal Ecosystem

In this study, we aimed to assess the cervicovaginal environment (pH, Nugent score, soluble immune factors and bacterial profile) in women with reproductive failure because of either repetitive abortion or infertility of unknown origin and compare it to that of healthy fertile women. The second objective was to evaluate the ability of Lactobacillus salivarius CECT5713 to modulate such parameters and to increase pregnancy rates in women with reproductive failure. The administration of L. salivarius CECT5713 (~9 log10 colony-forming units (CFU)/day) for 6 months or until a diagnosis of pregnancy to women with reproductive failure resulted in an overall successful (term) pregnancy rate of 56%.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In this study, we aimed to assess the cervicovaginal environment (pH, Nugent score, soluble immune factors and bacterial profile) in women with reproductive failure because of either repetitive abortion or infertility of unknown origin and compare it to that of healthy fertile women. The second objective was to evaluate the ability of Lactobacillus salivarius CECT5713 to modulate such parameters and to increase pregnancy rates in women with reproductive failure. Vaginal pH and Nugent score were higher in women with reproductive failure than in fertile women. Differences were also noted regarding soluble immune factors transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Their concentrations in cervicovaginal lavage samples were reduced by about one-half in women with reproductive failure compared to fertile women. Lactobacilli were detected in a higher proportion, and at a higher concentration and having different species profile, in fertile women than in women with repetitive abortion or infertility. The study of the vaginal microbiome revealed that samples from fertile women were characterized by the high abundance of Lactobacillus sequences, while in about one third of samples from women with reproductive failure DNA from this genus was practically absent while there was an abundance of that of Gardnerella and Bifidobacterium. Lactobacillus salivarius CECT5713 seemed to be a suitable candidate to modulate the cervicovaginal microbiota because of its acidifying capacity, adhesion to vaginal cells and co-aggregation with vaginal pathogens. The administration of L. salivarius CECT5713 (~9 log10 CFU/day) for 6 months or until a diagnosis of pregnancy to women with reproductive failure resulted in an overall successful (term) pregnancy rate of 56%. In addition, the probiotic intervention modified significantly key microbiological, biochemical and immunological parameters in women who got pregnant being their post-intervention values similar or close to those of fertile women. The high concentrations of L. salivarius and the detection of L. salivarius DNA in vaginal samples confirmed that the probiotic was able to reach the vaginal mucosa. In conclusion, L. salivarius CECT5713 has proved to be a good candidate to improve reproductive success in women with reproductive failure.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
58

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Dpt. Nutricion, Bromatologia y Tecnologia de los Alimentos

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

33 years to 41 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent miscarriage with three or more pregnancy losses during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy (RA group)
  • Infertility (inability to conceive) despite being the recipients of ART for at least three times, including two cycles, at least, of in vitro fertilization (IVF) (INF group).
  • Fertile women having at least two children after uncomplicated term pregnancies (Control group).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Antiphospholipid syndrome
  • Hormonal therapy, antibiotics or probiotics in the 4 weeks previous to sampling.
  • Lactose intolerance or cow's milk protein allergy (RA and INF groups)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Repetitive Abortion (RA) group
Starting at day 0, women of the RA (n=21) group consumed (oral route) a daily sachet with ~50 mg of freeze-dried probiotic (~9 log10 CFU of L. salivarius CECT5713) for 6 months or until a diagnosis of pregnancy (whatever happened first).
Biological: Lactobacillus salivarius CECT5713
Starting at day 0, women of the RA and INF groups consumed (oral route) a daily sachet with ~50 mg of freeze-dried probiotic (~9 log10 CFU of L. salivarius CECT5713) for 6 months or until a diagnosis of pregnancy (whatever happened first).
Experimental: Infertility (INF) group
Starting at day 0, women of the INF group (n=23) consumed (oral route) a daily sachet with ~50 mg of freeze-dried probiotic (~9 log10 CFU of L. salivarius CECT5713) for 6 months or until a diagnosis of pregnancy (whatever happened first).
Biological: Lactobacillus salivarius CECT5713
Starting at day 0, women of the RA and INF groups consumed (oral route) a daily sachet with ~50 mg of freeze-dried probiotic (~9 log10 CFU of L. salivarius CECT5713) for 6 months or until a diagnosis of pregnancy (whatever happened first).
No Intervention: Control group
The control group (n = 14) included fertile women having at least two children after uncomplicated term pregnancies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pregnancies and successful pregnancies
Time Frame: 6 months
Total number of pregnancies and number of pregnancies with delivery of a healthy baby
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modification of the vaginal microbiota
Time Frame: 6 months
Variation in the concentration of lactobacilli and other bacteria in cervicovaginal lavage samples
6 months
Vaginal immunomodulation
Time Frame: 6 months
Variation in the concentration of TGF-β and VEGF in cervicovaginal lavage
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Bisearch Life
Centro de Diagnóstico Médico. Ayuntamiento de Madrid.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Juan M Rodriguez, PhD, Complutense University Madrid

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 16, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 29, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 29, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 26, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 25, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PREPROBIFERT01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Global and individual microbiological and immunological data will be available to other researchers once the study is published.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be available to other researchers once the study is published.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

On request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings