Modality of Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy for Stage Ⅲ Endometrial Cancer

June 28, 2020 updated by: Peking University People's Hospital

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study of Modalities of Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy for Stage Ⅲ Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy affecting women's health. About 15% of the patients will have local late disease (stage III) with high risk of recurrence and tumor related mortality. There is a consensus that adjuvant radiochemotherapy is needed for stage Ⅲ endometrial cancer, but the best modality of radiochemotherapy is still uncertain. The retrospective data of our center showed that the sequential radiochemotherapy of "chemotherapy-radiotherapy-chemotherapy" in the "sanwich" mode could improve the survival outcome in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study to compare the "sanwich" mode of radiochemotherapy and the "concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by chemotherapy" mode will be carried out to determine the better modality of radiochemotherapy in stage III endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
654

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. patients of primary treatment
  2. All patients must have undertaken comprehensive staging operation（Surgery must have included a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy and surgical staging).
  3. Patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma confirmed by postoperative patholog.
  4. All patients with Surgical Stage III endometrial carcinoma according to FIGO 2009 staging criteria.
  5. Entry into the study is limited to no more than 8 weeks from the date of surgery.

  6. Patients with adequate organ function, reflected by the following parameters:

    1. WBC ≥ Normal value of the institution;
    2. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ Normal value of the institution;
    3. Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mcl;
    4. SGOT, SGPT, and alkaline phosphatase ≤ 1.25 X upper limit of normal (ULN) ;
    5. Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 X ULN;
    6. Creatinine ≤ institutional ULN.
  7. Patients with a Karnofsky score≥60.
  8. The patients should voluntarily join the study, sign an approved informed consent with good compliance and cooperation with the follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have received prior adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy or chemotherapy or endocrine therapy).
  2. Patients with residual tumor after surgery.
  3. Patients with other invasive malignancies.
  4. Patients with contraindications of radiotherapy and chemotherapy (with a history of myocardial infarction within 3 month, unstable angina pectoris or history of uncontrolled arrhythmia s from the date of registration) and who cannot receive postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
  5. Patients with an estimated survival of less than 6 months.
  6. Those who are unable or unwilling to comply with the research requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: sequential radiochemotherapy in a "sanwich" mode
Two courses of TC regimen chemotherapy (paclitaxel 135-175mg / m2; carboplatin AUC = 5; once every 21 days) will be given first, followed by external pelvic radiation (± vaginal brachytherapy), and then four courses of the same regime consolidation chemotherapy.
Other: sequential radiochemotherapy in a "sanwich" mode
Patients will randomized into two different modalities of radiochemotherapy.
Active Comparator: concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by chemotherapy
External pelvic radiation (± vaginal brachytherapy) will be given after operation. On the first day and the 29th day of radiotherapy, concurrent intravenous cisplatin (50mg/m2) will be given. After the concurrent radiochemotherapy, four courses of TC regimen (paclitaxel 135-175mg / m2; carboplatin AUC = 5; once every 21 days) chemotherapy will be given.
Other: sequential radiochemotherapy in a "sanwich" mode
Patients will randomized into two different modalities of radiochemotherapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progress-free survival
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first,assessed up to 60 months
To determine if treatment with radiochemotherapy in "sanwich" mode (carboplatin and paclitaxel for 2 cycles, then radiotherapy, and then carboplatin and paclitaxel for 4 cycles)(experimental arm) reduces the rate of recurrence or death (i.e., increases disease-free survival) when compared to concurrent cisplatin and radiation followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel for 4 cycles (control arm) in patients with stages III endometrial adenocarcinoma.
From the date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first,assessed up to 60 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 60 months
To determine if treatment with radiochemotherapy in "sanwich" mode (carboplatin and paclitaxel for 2 cycles, then radiotherapy, and then carboplatin and paclitaxel for 4 cycles)(experimental arm) reduces the rate of death (i.e., increases survival) when compared to concurrent cisplatin and radiation followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel for 4 cycles (control arm) in patients with stages III endometrial adenocarcinoma.
From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 60 months
adverse effect
Time Frame: through study completion,an average of 1 year
To compare the modalities with respect to acute and late adverse effects of therapy.
through study completion,an average of 1 year
patient-reported Quality of Life
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment and 1 year after treatment
To determine the impact on patient-reported Quality of Life (using the questionnaire of combining the items from FACT-G, FACT/GOG-NTX-4 subscale (4 items) and items C3 and C5 from the FACT-C)during and following treatment for up to 1 year with the two treatment regimens.
3 months after treatment and 1 year after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking University People's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 12, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 28, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020PHB013-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings