CIRCULATing Biomarkers for Individualized Surgical Therapy in gastroEsophageal Cancer - Phase 1 (CIRCULATE1)

March 7, 2024 updated by: Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Nikolas H. Stoecklein, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
This is an exploratory observational biomarker study in approximately 100 eligible patients with resectable adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastro- esophageal junction (GEJ) type I-II (GEAC) to investigate the difference deletion frequency of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) between peripheral veins and tumor-draining veins (primary endpoint), prognostic value, relevance of a set of two additional blood-based biomarkers analyzed from a single blood sampling tube (secondary endpoints). The underlying hypothesis is that the biomarker alone or in combination improve preoperative staging and help to identify patients at risk for metastasis. This should enable a better stratification of GEAC patients to neo-adjuvant treatment, (intensified) peri-operative treatment, or even surgery alone, in selected cases. The data of the CIRCULATE study shall be used design subsequent studies testing the predictive role of these biomarkers for surgical management. Patients will provide blood samples and lymphatic fluid during the operation and annual blood samples during clinical follow up of 5 years.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

This is an exploratory observational biomarker study. Around 20 mL of blood will be collected from a peripheral vein and additional 40 mL from tumor draining veins. In addition, around 5 mL of lymphatic fluid will be collected from the thoracic duct, when exposed and opened during the surgical resection. Annual blood draws (20 mL) will be performed during routine clinical follow-up or at the time point when the patients develops a (metastatic) relapse. A one tube protocol will be performed from each blood sample to assess CTCs and tumor derived extracellular Vesicles (tdEVs) using CELLSEARCH® and ACCEPT (https://github.com/LeonieZ/ACCEPT/blob/master/ACCEPT.m). In addition, tumor cells will be enumerated by CELLSEARCH® in the lymphatic fluid. ctDNA will be extracted from plasma of each blood collection tube and analyzed by mFAST-SeqS. If the mutational status of the primary tumor is known, deep sequencing of ctDNA will be applied for mutation tracking at a later time point. Tissue resected during the surgical procedure and not required for routine pathology will be collected into a biobank (cry-conserved and formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Germany
    • NRW
    • North-Rhine Westfalia
      • Münster, North-Rhine Westfalia, Germany, 48149
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitatsklinikum Munster
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The targeted study population of CIRCULATE1 are 100 patients (see 2.3) with resectable GEAC (GEJ type I-II) undergoing surgery with curative intention. The patients will be recruited and screened consecutively by trained surgeons involved into the CIRCULATE study. Patients are recruited to participate in this study at the outpatient clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the GEJ type I and II, resectable, non-metastatic tumor
  • age ≥18
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2,
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) < 4.
  • pre-treatment stage cT1N+ M0 or cT2-4a N0/N+, M0 GEJ type I and II adenocarcinomas can be included. In case of stage cT4a, curative resectability has to be explicitly verified by the local surgical investigator prior inclusion.
  • Written informed consent and the ability to understand the nature of the study and the study-related procedures and to comply with them has to be ensured.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • tumors of squamous, adenosquamous or other non-adenocarcinoma histology
  • patients with inoperable or metastatic GEJ type I and II adenocarcinoma, GEJ type I and II adenocarcinoma staged cT1N0 and cT4b, GEJ type I and II cT4a evaluated as not curatively resectable by the local surgical investigator
  • unsigned informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in CTC detection rate between peripheral and tumor draining veins.
Time Frame: 24 months
The difference between the CTC positivity rate (≥1 CTC / 7.5 mL) in blood samples of tumor-draining veins compared to the CTC positivity rate in peripheral blood. The positivity fraction and CTC number per 7.5 mL in tumor draining veins and peripheral blood samples will be determined by CellSearch.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
tdEVs
Time Frame: 24 months
1. The tdEV number per 7.5 mL determined from CellSearch images using the ACCEPT software tool and the fraction of tdEVs positive patients (a cut-off threshold will be applied)(de Wit, 2019). 2. The difference between tdEV measurement in the tumor-draining veins and the peripheral blood will be assessed.
24 months
ctDNA
Time Frame: 24 months
1. The tumor allele frequency measured by the genome-wide mFAST-SeqS assay (Belic, 2015) and the fraction of patients with high tumor allele frequency will be determined. For this, a threshold of 10% tumour allele frequency will be applied to discriminate high allele frequency (>10%) from low allele frequency (≤10%) cases (Belic, 2015; de Wit, 2019). 2. The difference between ctDNA measurement in the tumor-draining veins and the peripheral blood will be assessed.
24 months
Clinical correlation
Time Frame: 84 months
Correlation of any of the biomarker or in combination with clinical parameters and with patient clinical outcome (OS and RFS)
84 months
Dynamic Biobank
Time Frame: 24 months
The number of tumor tissues (primary tumor, lymph node metastasis, biopsy material), isolated CELLSEARCH® CTCs and plasma/ctDNA samples generated from CIRCULATE1 and stored in the respective biobanks from the University Hospital of Cologne and from University Hospital Düsseldorf.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University Hospital of Cologne

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nikolas Stoecklein, MD, Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf Germany
  • Principal Investigator: Christiane Bruns, MD, Surgery, University Hospital Cologne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 7, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020-06-BS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer of Esophagus

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings