Virtual Reality in Imaging Review for Cancer Patients
The Use of Virtual Reality for Diagnostic Imaging Review With Cancer Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80015
- University of Colorado, Anschutz Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Willingness to sign and date the consent form.
- Willingness to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study.
- Male or female patient 18 years or older.
- Available diagnostic imaging (MRI, CT and/or PET)
- Consultation in radiation oncology for consideration of radiation therapy.
- English speaking.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to complete virtual reality, survey and interview.
- Non-English speaking
- Patients with visual defects that affect their ability to view content in VR
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Virtual Reality for imaging review
Each participant (patient and caregiver(s)) will undergo standard 2D imaging review on a computer screen, followed by 3D imaging review in virtual reality during their radiation oncology consultation
|
Patients and caregivers will provide information via surveys and interviews regarding their experience viewing diagnostic imaging using conventional methods and using Virtual Reality
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Successful Completion of Imaging Review Using Virtual Reality
Time Frame: During the consultation 1 day visit
|
The percentage of patients able to complete the review of their imaging using virtual reality
|
During the consultation 1 day visit
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Satisfaction and preference
Time Frame: During the consultation 1 day visit
|
Evaluate patients' and caregivers' satisfaction and preferences regarding diagnostic imaging review using a focused survey
|
During the consultation 1 day visit
|
|
Qualitative feedback regarding imaging review using virtual reality
Time Frame: During the consultation 1 day visit
|
Collect patients' and caregivers' feedback regarding imaging review using virtual reality through qualitative interviews.
|
During the consultation 1 day visit
|
|
Baseline demographics and imaging review experience
Time Frame: During the consultation 1 day visit
|
Capture baseline demographics, education, and prior experience with diagnostic imaging review.
|
During the consultation 1 day visit
|
|
Intervention time interval
Time Frame: During the consultation 1 day visit
|
Measure the time spent reviewing diagnostic imaging with virtual reality and standard approaches relative to the consultation time
|
During the consultation 1 day visit
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Friedman AJ, Cosby R, Boyko S, Hatton-Bauer J, Turnbull G. Effective teaching strategies and methods of delivery for patient education: a systematic review and practice guideline recommendations. J Cancer Educ. 2011 Mar;26(1):12-21. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0183-x.
- Johnson A, Sandford J. Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home: systematic review. Health Educ Res. 2005 Aug;20(4):423-9. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg141. Epub 2004 Nov 30.
- Gold DT, McClung B. Approaches to patient education: emphasizing the long-term value of compliance and persistence. Am J Med. 2006 Apr;119(4 Suppl 1):S32-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.12.021.
- Fernsler JI, Cannon CA. The whys of patient education. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1991 May;7(2):79-86. doi: 10.1016/0749-2081(91)90085-4.
- Hess CB, Chen AM. Measuring psychosocial functioning in the radiation oncology clinic: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2014 Aug;23(8):841-54. doi: 10.1002/pon.3521. Epub 2014 May 21.
- Takahashi T, Hondo M, Nishimura K, Kitani A, Yamano T, Yanagita H, Osada H, Shinbo M, Honda N. Evaluation of quality of life and psychological response in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Radiat Med. 2008 Aug;26(7):396-401. doi: 10.1007/s11604-008-0248-5. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
- Theis SL, Johnson JH. Strategies for teaching patients: a meta-analysis. Clin Nurse Spec. 1995 Mar;9(2):100-5, 120. doi: 10.1097/00002800-199503000-00010.
- Press Ganey: public reporting gives huge boost to patient satisfaction. Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv. 2008 Dec;15(12):121-3.
- Meredith C, Symonds P, Webster L, Lamont D, Pyper E, Gillis CR, Fallowfield L. Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients' views. BMJ. 1996 Sep 21;313(7059):724-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7059.724.
- Shaverdian N, Yeboa DN, Gardner L, Harari PM, Liao K, McCloskey S, Tuli R, Vapiwala N, Jagsi R. Nationwide Survey of Patients' Perspectives Regarding Their Radiation and Multidisciplinary Cancer Treatment Experiences. J Oncol Pract. 2019 Dec;15(12):e1010-e1017. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00376. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20-0560.cc
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Virtual Reality
-
NCT07493863RecruitingEndoscopy | Virtual Reality | Ergonomics | Virtual Reality Headset
-
NCT07361913Not yet recruitingVirtual Reality | Education, Medical | Virtual Reality Simulation
-
NCT06612892CompletedVirtual Reality | Pediatric Burn | Immersive Virtual Reality | Passive Virtual Reality
-
NCT06550193RecruitingVirtual Reality | Augmented Reality
-
NCT06456398Not yet recruiting
-
NCT05583903Completed
Clinical Trials on Survey and interview
-
NCT02782637CompletedComplications | Extreme Prematurity
-
NCT02782650CompletedPremature Birth | Extremely Premature Infants
-
NCT04716972Completed
-
NCT00878267Completed
-
NCT03563352WithdrawnCholangiocarcinoma | Breast Carcinoma | Gastric Carcinoma | Colorectal Carcinoma | Pancreatic Carcinoma | Prostate Carcinoma | Malignant Digestive System Neoplasm
-
NCT00394602TerminatedCervical Cancer | Gastric Cancer | Pancreatic Cancer | Vulvar Cancer | Endometrial Cancer | Anal Cancer
-
NCT01811628CompletedTobacco Use Cessation