The Role of Spreader Grafts in Reduction Rhinoseptoplasty: a Randomized Clinical Trial With Quality of Life Assessment

July 31, 2020 updated by: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Nasal obstruction is one of the majors concerns in reduction rhinoseptoplasty, because it affects quality of life and surgical outcomes. Is the association of middle third grafts with reduction rhinoseptoplasty responsible for an increase in quality of life related to nasal obstruction when compared to reduction rhinoseptoplasty without the placement of these grafts?

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Reduction rhinoplasty and rhinoseptoplasty are among the most accomplished aesthetic procedures in Plastic Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology. Nasal obstruction is one of the majors concerns in this procedures, because it affects quality of life and surgical outcomes. Nasal surgeons have paid much attention to nasal valve area to prevent nasal obstruction and some assert reconstruction of the middle vault after dorsal reduction with grafts. The gold standard for middle vault reconstruction after dorsal reduction has been the spreader graft, first advocated by Sheen. Studies in surgical techniques for the treatment of nasal valve collapse focus much more in techniques than in evidence of its efficacy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 76 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients eligible for reduction rhinoseptoplasty who agreed to participate in the study and who did not meet the exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of nasal obstruction;
  • Previous nasosinusal surgery;
  • Symmetrical or asymmetric insufficiency of the middle third that would justify the placement of middle third grafts for the treatment of these problems;
  • Presence of nasal valve insufficiency as the only cause of nasal obstruction;
  • Cranio-facial anomalies;
  • Presence of nasosinusal tumors;
  • Active acute rhinosinusitis;
  • Patients undergoing treatment of other entities concomitant to rhinoseptoplasty such as: sinus inflammatory surgery, adenoid hypertrophy removal, septal perforation correction, otoplasty or blepharoplasty.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Spreader Graft
Placement and attachment with 5.0 polydioxanone (PDS) suture 2 grafts in the middle third of the nose
To place and attach with 5.0 PDS suture 2 grafts in the middle third of the nose
Other Names:
  • Middle Third Grafts
No Intervention: Without Spreader Graft
No engraftment in the middle third

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale (NOSE)
Time Frame: 180 postoperative days

The NOSE will be used to measure the quality of life related to nasal obstruction. It is a validated instrument specifically designed for use in patients with nasal obstruction. According to this scale patients are asked to evaluate difficulty breathing in a general way and specifically the difficulty in breathing through the nose, breathing during sleep, and severity of their nasal congestion. The severity of the symptoms is recorded on a scale of 0 to 4, with 0 being the absence of a problem and 4 being a serious problem. The possible scores range from 0 to 20 and the higher scores indicate a higher degree of nasal obstruction. The sum of the scores is multiplied by 5 so as to obtain a final score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher values associated with poorer quality of life.

The scale will be applied at the base line and at 30, 90 and 180 postoperative days.

180 postoperative days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) Scale
Time Frame: 180 postoperative days
The ROE scale is a questionnaire, designed for the evaluation of rhinoplasty results. This instrument is composed of six questions that assess three domains of quality of life: physical, mental / emotional and social. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 to 4 and converted to a total score of 0 to 100, dividing the value by 24 and multiplying by 100. A score above 85 is considered excellent and generally means that the patient is very satisfied. However, the comparison of pre and postoperative values usually provide the most relevant information. Patients will be asked to respond to this scale in the base line and at 30, 90 and 180 postoperative days.
180 postoperative days
Visual Analogue Scale - Nasal Obstruction
Time Frame: 180 postoperative days
Patients will be asked to complete an analogue-visual scale indicating the degree of nasal obstruction, with the instrument Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS for nasal obstruction has 100 mm and this scale will be converted into a scale ranging from 0 to 100, and the value "0" represents no nasal obstruction and the value "100" correspond to the highest nasal obstruction level possible. The scale will be applied in the base line as well as in the 30,90 and 180 postoperative days.
180 postoperative days
Clinical Diagnosis of Allergic Rhinitis
Time Frame: Base line and 180 postoperative days
A questionnaire of symptoms and intensity based in Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) recommendations and treatment of Allergic Rhinitis is applied in the base line and 30, 90 and 180 postoperative days
Base line and 180 postoperative days
Complications
Time Frame: 7 until 180 postoperative days
The protocol includes data such as bleeding, signs of graft detachment, presence of crusts, residual septal deviation, synechiae and septal perforation to be to be evaluated on the 7th, 30th, 90th and 180th postoperative days
7 until 180 postoperative days
Anterior Rhinoscopy and Nasal Endoscopy
Time Frame: Base line and 180 postoperative days

All patients will be submitted to anterior rhinoscopy and nasal endoscopy using a 0 degree rigid nasal endoscope. The septal deviation will be classified considering the side of maximum deviation (right / left), the severity of the obstruction caused by the septal deviation (<25% of obstruction, 25-50% of obstruction, 50-75% of obstruction;> 75% of obstruction) and the location of the point of greatest deviation based on the classification of the five Cottle areas.

The evaluation of this outcome will be performed in the preoperative consultation, 30, 90 and 180 after the surgery.

Base line and 180 postoperative days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Michelle Lavinsky-Wolff, PhD, Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 3, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 91672218400005327

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nasal Obstruction

Clinical Trials on Spreader Graft

Search Similar Trials