Incidental Auditory Category Training for Language Learning (IACT)
Examining the Impact of Non-linguistic Incidental Auditory Category Training on Adult Language Acquisition
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
- Carnegie Mellon University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 or older, normal hearing
- Native/non-native Chinese speakers
Exclusion Criteria:
- Younger than 18, loss of hearing
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Incidental training
Participants undergo novel non-linguistic incidental category learning training.
|
Training involving non-speech sounds embedded in a video-game.
|
|
Experimental: Explicit training
Participants undergo traditional explicit language learning.
|
Training involving explicit sound and category information
|
|
No Intervention: No training
Participants do not undergo any training.
|
|
|
Experimental: Classroom training
Participants take part in structured classroom learning.
|
Structured adult classroom language training.
|
|
Experimental: Classroom and incidental training
Participants take part in structured classroom learning and incidental learning.
|
Both classroom and incidental training.
|
|
Experimental: Classroom and explicit training
Participants take part in structured classroom learning and explicit learning.
|
Both classroom and explicit training.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Sensitivity (D-prime) to Novel Speech Sounds After 2 Months of Training
Time Frame: Pre-test (baseline) and immediately after 2 months of training.
|
Each participant's 96 auditory discrimination data points at Pre-test and Post-test, respectively, were reduced to one sensitivity score: d-prime (d': hits minus false alarms).
This transformation takes into account response bias and approaches a normal distribution.
A higher score represents greater sensitivity.
The difference in scores from pre- to post-test represents the change.
|
Pre-test (baseline) and immediately after 2 months of training.
|
|
Change in Auditory Category Learning Accuracy After 2 Months of Training
Time Frame: Pre-test (baseline) and immediately after 2 months of training.
|
Each participant's 96 auditory categorization data points at Pre-test and Post-test, respectively, were turned into a mean of the correct answers.
The difference between the two accuracy scores represents the mean change in accuracy.
|
Pre-test (baseline) and immediately after 2 months of training.
|
|
Novel Auditory Word Learning Accuracy After 2 Months of Training
Time Frame: Immediately after 2 months of training.
|
At post-test, participants did a three day novel word learning task.
Their 48 word identification data points on the first and third days, respectively, were turned into a mean correct score.
The difference in scores from Day 1 to Day 3 represents the change in mean novel word learning accuracy.
|
Immediately after 2 months of training.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Word Recognition Accuracy in Unrelated Language 3 Months After Training
Time Frame: 3 months post-intervention
|
Three months after training, participants were scheduled to learn words in an unrelated language.
Their mean accuracy would be calculated.
|
3 months post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Seth Wiener, PhD, Carnegie Mellon University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1R03HD099382-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.