Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block After Breast Cancer Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Melikgazi
-
Kayseri, Melikgazi, Turkey
- TC Erciyes University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA I-II patients undergoing breast surgery for breast cancer
- Becoming available of complete records about study data
Exclusion Criteria:
- ASA III-IV patients
- missing records about study data
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Erector Spinae
patients who are administered ultrasound guided ESPB at T4 vertebrae level with long acting local anesthetic (%0,25 bupivacaine) and followed up with patient controlled analgesia device and all records about aforementioned data is completely available.
|
Ultrasound guided ESPB is applied at T4 vertebrae level, 3 cm lateral to mid-line where transverse process lies.
After identification of transverse process, needle is advanced in plane and real time visualisation on ultrasound screen.
When bonny contact is encountered, normal saline is injected for verification of placement, then, 25 ml %0,25 bupivacaine is injected plane between transverse process and erector spinae muscles.
|
|
Control
patients who are not administered any regional analgesic technique and followed up with patient controlled analgesia device and all records about aforementioned data is completely available.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Opioid Consumption
Time Frame: First 24 hours after surgery
|
all patients were given 0.05 mg/kg morphine iv and 1 gr paracetamol 30 minutes before end of surgery and in the recovery room, a patient- controlled analgesia device containing morphine 0.5 mg/ml, set to deliver a 1mg bolus dose of morphine with an 10 min lockout time.
Total morphine consumption during the 24 hours postoperative period will recorded at 5 times intervals ( 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours).
|
First 24 hours after surgery
|
|
Verbal Analog Pain Scores on rest and movement
Time Frame: First 24 hours after surgery, at 1., 3., 6. month
|
A Research assistant, blinded to the group allocation, interviewed patients and collected data at 5 times intervals ( 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, hours) in the 24 hours postoperatively.
Patients were asked to rate their pain using verbal analog scale, where 0= no pain and 10= worst pain possible.
|
First 24 hours after surgery, at 1., 3., 6. month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Demographic Data
Time Frame: First 24 hours after surgery
|
Age, sex, medical history, BMI, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) status, Duration and type of surgery were recorded
|
First 24 hours after surgery
|
|
Blood Pressures
Time Frame: during and first 24 hours after surgery
|
systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures as mmHg
|
during and first 24 hours after surgery
|
|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: during and first 24 hours after surgery
|
Heart rate as beat per minute (BPM)
|
during and first 24 hours after surgery
|
|
incidence of adverse effects (like nausea and vomiting)
Time Frame: First 24 hours after surgery
|
incidence of nausea and vomiting during the 24 hours postoperative period was recorded recorded at 5 times intervals ( 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours)
|
First 24 hours after surgery
|
|
Rescue analgesic requirement
Time Frame: First 24 hours after surgery
|
number of request and dosages of non opioid analgesics used for VAS equal or greater than 5 or patient request.
|
First 24 hours after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: ersin SÖNMEZ, Research Asisstant
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
- Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu UH, Kilic CT. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: A randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Nov;50:65-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020/134
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.