Adductor Canal Block

March 31, 2026 updated by: OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.

Multimodal Periarticular Analgesic Injection With and Without Surgeon-Administered Adductor Canal Block During Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The investigators aim to investigate whether the addition of a surgeon-administered adductor canal blockade to a multimodal periarticular injection cocktail provides additional pain relief for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. This study will help identify the effectiveness of surgeon-administered adductor canal blockade in perioperative pain control for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Local anesthesia is an important component of multimodal pain management during the perioperative period for total knee arthroplasty, particularly with increased emphasis on early mobilization and decreased length of stay. Periarticular injections and regional nerve blocks are both effective in providing short-term pain relief when administered in isolation, and multiple randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that when administered in conjunction with one another, they also provide a synergistic effect.

Periarticular injections are the simplest mechanism for infiltrating the surgical site with analgesic medications, and these provide effective pain relief. One described technique involves infiltrating this mixture into the lateral femoral periosteum, posterior capsule, medial periosteum, capsule and skin during various portions of a total knee arthroplasty. This is the technique used in our practice.

Regional nerve blocks also have beneficial effects on pain, early mobilization and length of stay. Traditionally, anesthesiologist-administered femoral nerve blocks were utilized for this purpose. The femoral nerve consists of 4 main branches:the terminal portion of the vastusmedialis branch innervates the medial collateral ligament (MCL). The terminal portion of the vastusintermedius branch innervates the anterosuperior aspect of the knee capsule. The terminal portion of the vastuslateralis branch does not innervate the knee capsule. The saphenous nerve is the terminal sensory branch of the femoral nerve and travels in the adductor canal. It gives off an infrapatellar branch which exits the adductor canal to innervate the skin on the anteromedial aspect of the knee and the anteroinferior aspect of the knee capsule. Blockade of the entire femoral nerve results in significant quadriceps motor deficits.

Adductor canal blocks can be targeted to anesthetize only the saphenous branch of the femoral nerve, however, and this spares the motor innervation to the quadriceps. Multiple randomized controlled trials have shown that these adductor canal blockades provide equivalent analgesic effects to femoral nerve blocks without associated deficits in quadriceps strength. In one study, quadriceps strength was measured immediately prior to and immediately following placement of femoral and adductor can blocks in patients undergoing TKA. After the femoral block, quadriceps strength decreased to 16% of the baseline pre-block value. After the adductor-canal-block, however, strength increased to 193% of the pre-block value. MRI measurements, cadaveric injections, and dissections have shown that a surgeon-performed injection of the saphenous nerve from within the knee after it exits from the adductor canal is a feasible procedure, and a randomized controlled trial found that a surgeon-administered adductor canal blockade was non-inferior to the traditional adductor canal blockade administered by an anesthesiologist. This technique is simple and can be easily performed during administration of a periarticular injection. It is unclear based on the current literature whether this surgeon-administered adductor canal blockade provides a synergistic effect on pain relief when combined with a periarticular injection.

Treatment Group:

The treatment group will consist of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty who receive standardized 100 cc periarticular injection into the lateral femoral periosteum, posterior capsule, medial periosteum, capsule and skin. Patients will then receive 10cc of ropivacaine into their adductor canal. This will be administered by injecting into the adductor canal without dissecting down to the saphenous nerve and without ultrasound guidance.

Comparison (Control) Group:

The control group will consist of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty who receive a standardized periarticular injection into the lateral femoral periosteum, posterior capsule, medial periosteum, capsule and skin. Patients randomized in this group will then receive 10cc of saline into their adductor canal. This will be administered by injecting into the adductor canal without dissecting down to the saphenous nerve and without ultrasound guidance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

93

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28209
        • OrthoCarolina Research Institute, OrthoCarolina, P.A.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients age 30-85undergoing first-time primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and remaining hospitalized for at least one night

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty
  2. Patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty
  3. Workers compensation patients
  4. Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty for post-traumatic arthritis
  5. Patients with inflammatory arthritis
  6. Patients with any previous surgery on the operative knee which involved an arthrotomy
  7. Patients taking opioids prior to total knee arthroplasty
  8. Patients with a known history of drug or alcohol abuse
  9. Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty at an ambulatory surgery center, or being discharged home from the hospital on the same day as their procedure (planned)
  10. Patients who have had a total knee arthroplasty performed on the contralateral knee

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment Group (Ropivacaine)
The treatment group will consist of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty who receive standardized 100 cc periarticularinjection into the lateral femoral periosteum, posterior capsule, medial periosteum, capsule and skin. Patients will then receive 10cc of ropivacaineinto their adductor canal.This will be administered by injecting into the adductor canal without dissecting down to the saphenous nerve and without ultrasound guidance.
Ropivacaine is a local anesthetic that is FDA approved for local anesthetic nerve block.
All subjects participating in this study will undergo primary total knee arthroplasty
Placebo Comparator: Control Group (Saline)
The control group will consist of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty who receive a standardized periarticular injection into the lateral femoral periosteum, posterior capsule, medial periosteum, capsule and skin. Patients randomized in this group will then receive 10cc of saline into their adductor canal. This will be administered by injecting into the adductor canal without dissecting down to the saphenous nerve and without ultrasound guidance.
All subjects participating in this study will undergo primary total knee arthroplasty
Saline will be used as a placebo injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain, as defined by patient-reported NPRS pain scores on a scale of 0-10 on Postoperative day 1
Time Frame: Approximately 24 hours following closure
Pain will be measured before discharge on postoperative day 1 on a scale of 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)
Approximately 24 hours following closure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain, as defined by patient-reported NPRS pain scores on a scale of 0-10 on Postoperative day 0, 1, 2, 4 and at 4-6 week postoperative visit
Time Frame: Every 6 hours for postoperative day 0-2, every 6 hours on postoperative day 4, and at 4-6 week visit

Postoperative pain, as defined by patient-reported NPRS pain scores on a scale of 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain) on:

  • Postoperative day 0: in PACU and Q 6 hours
  • Postoperative day 1: Q 6 hours
  • Postoperative day 2: Q 6 hours via pain diary
  • Postoperative day 4: Q 6 hours via pain diary
  • 4-6 weeks postoperatively in office visit.
Every 6 hours for postoperative day 0-2, every 6 hours on postoperative day 4, and at 4-6 week visit
Timed Up & Go test
Time Frame: 24 hours following surgical closure
Timed up & go test administered on postoperative day 1 by physical therapy
24 hours following surgical closure
Gait Assessment
Time Frame: 24 hours following surgical closure
Assessment using 2 Minute walk test, administered by physical therapy on postoperative day #1
24 hours following surgical closure
Range of Motion
Time Frame: 24 hours following surgical closure
Range of motion in knee flexion and extension on postoperative day 1 administered by physical therapy
24 hours following surgical closure
Range of Motion
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks
Range of motion in knee flexion and extension at 4-6 week visit administered by treating surgeon
4-6 weeks
Quadriceps Strength
Time Frame: 24 hours following surgical closure
Quadriceps Strength (motor blockade) as demonstrated by ability to have active extension and perform a straight leg raise at Physical Therapy on postoperative day # 0 and postoperative day #1 prior to discharge.
24 hours following surgical closure
Patient Satisfaction with Pain
Time Frame: 4-6 week visit
Patient-reported satisfaction with pain control on a 10-point Likert scale where 10 is the highest satisfaction
4-6 week visit
Pain Diary
Time Frame: 7 days following surgical closure
Patient-reported opioid consumption in morphine milliequivalents in first 7 days postoperatively as recorded in a pain diary
7 days following surgical closure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bryan D Springer, MD, OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 9172 (CTEP)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to currently make individual participant data available to other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine injection

Search Similar Trials