Clinical Trial of a Novel Dose Adjustment Algorithm for Preventing Cytopenia-Related Delays During FOLFOX Chemotherapy

September 16, 2025 updated by: Gabriel A. Brooks, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

A Pragmatic, Single-Arm Clinical Trial of a Novel Dose Adjustment Algorithm for Preventing Cytopenia-Related Delays During FOLFOX Chemotherapy

The study is testing an intervention of an investigator-developed chemotherapy dose adjustment algorithm. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the chemotherapy dose adjustment algorithm for reducing unplanned delays in patients receiving FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin)-type chemotherapy, while maintaining acceptable chemotherapy dose-intensity.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study intervention will involve implementation of a clinical algorithm to guide chemotherapy dose reductions and treatment delays in patients with neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia during treatment with FOLFOX-type regimens. The clinical algorithm was developed by the principal investigator, and the algorithm has been iteratively revised over time based on experiences from use in routine care.

Features of the dose adjustment algorithm that differ from criteria used in clinical trial protocols and routine care include:

  • At presentation for cycle 2 and 3 - the algorithm employs proactive chemotherapy dose reductions, without treatment delay, in patients with mild cytopenias (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] 1000-1499/mm3 and/or platelet count 75,000-99,000/mm3). In usual care, mild cytopenias during early treatment cycles do not trigger a chemotherapy dose reduction, but these early cytopenia events often lead to more severe cytopenias and subsequent delays in later treatment cycles.
  • At any cycle - the algorithm employs chemotherapy dose reductions without treatment delay in patients with moderate cytopenias (ANC 750-999/mm3 and/or platelet count 50,000-74,000/mm3). In usual care, moderate cytopenias trigger both a chemotherapy treatment delay AND a subsequent dose reduction, whereas the study algorithm will introduce a dose reduction without a treatment delay.

Decisions about dose modifications and delays for reasons other than neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia will be made at the discretion of the treating clinician, as per standard-of-care treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
52

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age greater than 18
  • Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract (to include cancers of the colorectum, stomach, esophagus, appendix, and small bowel)
  • The treating oncologist's recommendation must be for six or more cycles of standard-dose mFOLFOX chemotherapy (with or without concurrent bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, or trastuzumab). Intent of treatment may be either curative or palliative in nature.
  • Completion of day 1 of cycle 1 of standard-of-care FOLFOX chemotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior receipt of systemic chemotherapy in the 12 months prior to day 1 of cycle 1 of mFOLFOX (other than radiation-sensitizing chemotherapy)
  • History of baseline neutropenia; defined as neutrophil count <1500 in the 30 days preceding planned day 1 of cycle 1 of mFOLFOX
  • History of baseline thrombocytopenia; defined as platelet count <100,000) in the 30 days preceding planned day 1 of cycle 1 of mFOLFOX
  • Patients with a history of an uncorrected bleeding condition that would preclude safe use of the dose adjustment algorithm, in the judgement of the enrolling investigator
  • Patients who have started a new prescription anticoagulant (e.g. warfarin, heparin derivatives, or direct oral anticoagulants) in the 14 days preceding day 1 of cycle 1 of mFOLFOX
  • Patients who are unable to provide informed consent
  • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Study Arm
All patients in this single-arm study will be exposed to the experimental chemotherapy dose-adjustment algorithm.
Other: Algorithm for cytopenia-related delay and dose-reduction of mFOLFOX chemotherapy
Chemotherapy dose-adjustment algorithm for FOLFOX chemotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Unplanned Chemotherapy Treatment Delay
Time Frame: Through day 1 of cycle 6 of FOLFOX chemotherapy (cycle length is 14 days)
Number of patients with any interruption of chemotherapy leading to a cycle length of >18 days that is not anticipated as of day 3 of the preceding treatment cycle.
Through day 1 of cycle 6 of FOLFOX chemotherapy (cycle length is 14 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite Safety Endpoint
Time Frame: Through day 1 of cycle 6 of FOLFOX chemotherapy (cycle length is 14 days)
Number of patients meeting the composite endpoint of 1) febrile neutropenia (grade 3 or 4), 2) major bleeding with concurrent grade 3 thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50,000/mm3), 3) CTCAE grade 4 neutropenia (ANC <500/mm3), and/or 4) CTCAE grade 4 thrombocytopenia (platelet count <25,000/mm3)
Through day 1 of cycle 6 of FOLFOX chemotherapy (cycle length is 14 days)
Relative Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy
Time Frame: Through day 1 of cycle 6 of FOLFOX chemotherapy (cycle length is 14 days)
Relative dose intensity (RDI) of chemotherapy. RDI is defined as (planned cumulative dose/cumulative administered dose)*(actual duration/planned duration). RDI will be calculated separately for each component of the FOLFOX regimen (5-FU bolus, 5-FU infusion, oxaliplatin).
Through day 1 of cycle 6 of FOLFOX chemotherapy (cycle length is 14 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gabriel A Brooks, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 7, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 7, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 16, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D20125

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings