Remote Monitoring in Patients With Heart Failure (REM-HF)

January 12, 2021 updated by: Morten Lamberts, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

Investigating Arrhythmias in a High-risk Population With Heart Failure Using Remote Monitoring (Coala Heart Monitor)

This study is a prospective cohort study with consecutive enrollment of newly diagnosed heart failure patients, investigating the prevalence and types of arrhythmias in this high-risk population using non-invasive remote monitoring with the Coala Heart Monitor. Participants are scheduled to use the Coala Heart Monitor twice daily or during symptoms (e.g. syncope, presyncope, palpitations, chest discomfort, or shortness of breath) to record a thumb and chest ECG over 3 months. Patient compliance with the recordings, self-reported health, response to technology, and experience using the device will additionally be assessed by self-developed questionnaires and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 3 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
130

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
    • Hellerup
      • Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark, 2900
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Cardiology, Herlev & Gentofte Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Morten Kjøbæk Lamberts, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Newly diagnosed heart failure patients > 18 years of age from heart failure clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Owns or has access to a smartphone
  • Newly diagnosed moderate to severe heart failure (NYHA II-IV and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Earlier atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter with indication for oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment
  • Pacemaker
  • Cardiac resynchronization device
  • Indications for OAC treatment (also low molecular weight heparin) due to atrial arrhythmias, mechanical heart valve, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism.
  • Expected survival ≤ 6 months
  • Absolute contraindications for starting OAC treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
New-onset arrhythmias
Time Frame: 3 months
Incidence of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation/atrial arrhythmias on patient-activated thumb and chest ECG recordings
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient compliance
Time Frame: Week 8
Patient compliance with at least two daily recordings.
Week 8
Patient self-reported health
Time Frame: 3 months
Patient self-reported health assessed by KCCQ.
3 months
Patient-reported outcomes
Time Frame: 3 months
Patients' response to technology and experience using the device assessed by self-developed questionnaire.
3 months
Assessing recordings
Time Frame: 3 months
Where there are interpretations of arrhythmias on recordings, agreement of recordings with subsequent Holter monitoring will be assessed.
3 months
Subsequent prescriptions
Time Frame: 3 years
Through linkage with nationwide health care databases, subsequent prescription patterns of diuretics and antithrombotic medication in patients with and without atrial fibrillation.
3 years
Subsequent implantations
Time Frame: 3 years
Through linkage with nationwide health care databases, subsequent implantation of cardiac devices in patients with and without atrial fibrillation.
3 years
Subsequent readmissions
Time Frame: 3 years
Through linkage with nationwide health care databases, subsequent readmissions to hospital in patients with and without atrial fibrillation.
3 years
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 3 years
Through linkage with nationwide health care databases, all-cause mortality in patients with and without atrial fibrillation.
3 years
Cardiovascular mortality
Time Frame: 3 years
Through linkage with nationwide health care databases, cardiovascular mortality in patients with and without atrial fibrillation.
3 years
Admissions for worsening heart failure
Time Frame: 3 years
Through linkage with nationwide health care databases, and admission for worsening heart failure in patients with and without atrial fibrillation.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Coala Life, Inc

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 24, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 12, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P-2020-551

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings