PINPOINT: Gaming Technology for SCD Pain (Pinpoint II)

April 3, 2024 updated by: Klein Buendel, Inc.

PINPOINT: Gaming Technology to Engage Adolescent Sickle Cell Patients in Precision Pain Phase II

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a common genetic disorder characterized by episodes of pain, yet programs to assist SCD adolescents with better identification and communication about pain are lacking. Research shows that interactive gaming technology can enhance adolescents' learning, and can be especially effective in delivering health-related messages and tools to improve self-care. Pinpoint is an interactive gaming app that will be tested in a Phase II project to determine whether the app assists SCD teens with improving their communication and identification skills for pain self-report.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common inherited blood disorder in the U.S. and disproportionately affects African Americans and Hispanics. Approximately, 1,000 U.S. children are born with SCD annually. SCD results from abnormal hemoglobin and causes red blood cells (RBCs) to become misshaped ("sickle-shaped"). Sickled cells can block the flow of blood in small arteries causing tissue and organ damage and other life-threatening comorbidities. SCD complications can be serious and have a significant impact upon well-being and quality of life. Pain is the hallmark symptom associated with SCD, and is the most common clinical problem seen in children and the number one cause of SCD-related hospital admissions. If left untreated, these painful episodes can result in morbidity and mortality. Accurate assessment of pain specifiers (type, frequency, and intensity of pain) can help with ameliorating pain quickly and effectively. Despite children being accurate self-reporters of their pain, strategies which are effective and engaging to assist with pain identification and communication of pain are lacking. In a Phase I SBIR, the investigator's team examined the feasibility and acceptability of a gamified tablet application (Pinpoint) intended to encourage teens to talk about and assess their SCD pain. The Phase I specific aims were : (1) work with an Expert Advisory Board (EAB) of experts to develop a new pain assessment tool (PAT) to engage adolescent SCD patients, improve pain specification by patients, and improve pain management by clinicians; (2) conduct cognitive interviews and focus groups with 13-17 year old SCD patients to guide and refine development of app content, design, and aesthetics to fully develop a functioning prototype; (3) conduct usability testing with 13-17 year old SCD patients to assess functionality, navigation, and satisfaction; (4) conduct cognitive interviews with medical providers to provide input on app content, perceived barriers to use, and its potential for clinical use and integration to inform future implementation; and (5) develop a specifications document to outline the Phase II development plan. Deliverables were met and feasibility was confirmed by the EAB. The proposed Phase II project will (1) develop a fully programmed, interactive Pinpoint app consisting of modules to address pain identification and communication; (2) conduct usability testing of Pinpoint to evaluate the user interface, ease of use, and perceived barriers in order to optimize the app prior to large scale evaluation (n=14); and (3) test the full app with 13-17 year olds with SCD (n=100) using a randomized step wedge design to evaluate changes in (a) knowledge acquisition for communicating about pain and types of pain; (b) the Pain Assessment; (c) SCD general knowledge and self-efficacy; (d) family cohesion; and (e) app usage. Overall, the proposed project has the potential to significantly impact the health of SCD teens by providing important skill acquisition for communicating about and identifying pain. This project is innovative and timely. Pinpoint will be the first app to identify and translate specific pain types for SCD into a gamified app using applied gamification principles.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Golden, Colorado, United States, 80401
        • Klein Buendel, Inc.
    • Indiana
      • Munster, Indiana, United States, 463213963
        • Hilton Publishing Company

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be 13-17 years of age
  • Be diagnosed with sickle cell disease
  • Able to read and speak English
  • Able to assent to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not 13-17 years of age
  • Not diagnosed with sickle cell disease
  • Unable to read and speak English
  • Unable to assent to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Pinpoint App
Tablet and smartphone application.
Other: Pinpoint app
Tablet and smartphone app with pain assessment and communication education, and pain assessment tool.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sickle Cell Self-efficacy Scale Reported by Adolescents
Time Frame: baseline
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) self-efficacy: This instrument, used to assess self-efficacy in adolescents with SCD, is comprised of 9 questions measuring participants' perceptions of their ability to function on a day-to-day basis and to manage SCD symptoms (e.g., pain). The instrument is reliable and valid for assessing adolescents' self-efficacy for engaging successfully in day-to-day activities despite having SCD. Responses from individual items are summed to give an overall score. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy. Range = 0-45 (min=10 max=45).
baseline
Sickle Cell Self-efficacy Scale Reported by Adolescents
Time Frame: 4-weeks
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) self-efficacy: This instrument, used to assess self-efficacy in adolescents with SCD, is comprised of 9 questions measuring participants' perceptions of their ability to function on a day-to-day basis and to manage SCD symptoms (e.g., pain). The instrument is reliable and valid for assessing adolescents' self-efficacy for engaging successfully in day-to-day activities despite having SCD. Responses from individual items are summed to give an overall score, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. Range = 0-45 (min= 9; max = 45).
4-weeks
Sickle Cell Self-efficacy Scale Reported by Adolescents
Time Frame: 8-weeks
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) self-efficacy: This instrument, used to assess self-efficacy in adolescents with SCD, is comprised of 9 questions measuring participants' perceptions of their ability to function on a day-to-day basis and to manage SCD symptoms (e.g., pain). The instrument is reliable and valid for assessing adolescents' self-efficacy for engaging successfully in day-to-day activities despite having SCD. Responses from individual items are summed to give an overall score. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy. Range = 0-45 (min= 24 max=45).
8-weeks
Sickle Cell Self-efficacy Scale Reported by Adolescents
Time Frame: 12-weeks
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) self-efficacy: This instrument, used to assess self-efficacy in adolescents with SCD, is comprised of 9 questions measuring participants' perceptions of their ability to function on a day-to-day basis and to manage SCD symptoms (e.g., pain). The instrument is reliable and valid for assessing adolescents' self-efficacy for engaging successfully in day-to-day activities despite having SCD. Responses from individual items are summed to give an overall score, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. Range = 0-45 (min=26 max=45).
12-weeks
Sickle Cell Self-efficacy Scale
Time Frame: 16-weeks
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) self-efficacy: This instrument, used to assess self-efficacy in adolescents with SCD, is comprised of 9 questions measuring participants' perceptions of their ability to function on a day-to-day basis and to manage SCD symptoms (e.g., pain). The instrument is reliable and valid for assessing adolescents' self-efficacy for engaging successfully in day-to-day activities despite having SCD. Responses from individual items are summed to give an overall score, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. Range = 0-45 (min=18 max=45).
16-weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: final posttest (either 12-weeks or 16-weeks, per stepped wedge design)
Technology acceptability: The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a reliable tool for measuring the usability of technologies. It consists of a 10-item questionnaire with five response options for respondents; from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree. The participant's scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100. Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking. Based on research, a SUS score above a 68 would be considered above average and anything below 68 is below average. Range = 37.5-100
final posttest (either 12-weeks or 16-weeks, per stepped wedge design)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Klein Buendel, Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
Hilton Publishing Company

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Valerie Myers, PhD, Klein Buendel, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 19, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 3, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 322
  • R44MD010746-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings