Cemented vs. Cementless TKA
What Are the Results of Cemented vs. Cementless TKA With the Same Implant Design? A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Aseptic Loosening remains a leading cause for revision following TKA. Cemented TKAs have shown high failure rates in obese and younger populations. There is renewed interest in biologic fixation of total knee components with a more active and younger patient population, as well as long term alternatives in obese patients receiving TKA.
Questions remain whether cemented or cementless long term fixation is superior in total knee arthroplasty in these populations.
Potential benefits of cementless fixation include preservation of bone, decreased operative times, and elimination of complications specific to cemented components. Older cementless TKA designs had higher failure rates due to poor fixation methods, patch porous coating on the implant, poor tibial locking mechanisms and the use of conventional polyethylene. The combination of these factors led to unacceptable failure rates in these devices. Newer designs have looked to improve these flaws with advances in the biologic interface, use of highly porous metals, improved locking mechanisms, and cross-linked polyethylene.
Recently, cementless implants with these improved design features have shown improved long term outcomes of cementless components versus their cemented predecessors. The combination of these improved long term outcomes in younger, more active population warrant further investigation of cementless components in TKA. There is a need for more durable, long term fixation in all implants treating obese, as well as young active patients.
The investigators are evaluating an implant (Depuy Attune TKA) that was recently released to market with a cementless design that is yet to have long term comparative data between this cementless design or cemented options. The investigators are conducting a study to compare the results of this cementless design to the cemented design of the same implant.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
- OrthoCarolina Research Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Evaluation for TKA at OrthoCarolina
- Evaluated and scheduled for TKA by Drs. Keith Fehring, Bo Mason, William Griffin, Thomas Fehring, or Jesse Otero
- Determined by the above surgeon to be a candidate for the Attune Posterior Stabilized knee system, with the patella to be resurfaced during surgery
- >18 years of age at enrollment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous surgery with hardware on the joint of interest
- >= 65 years old at the time of TKA surgery
- Previous diagnosis of inflammatory disease (RA, inflammatory arthropathy, any autoimmune disease)
- BMI <= 40
- Physician discretion due to not being able to follow standard-of-care (SOC) TKA follow up protocol
- History of contralateral TKA
- Current Tobacco Use
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Treatment/Intervention
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with cementless knees
|
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with cementless knees
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Control
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented knees
|
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented knees
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Revision for loosening
Time Frame: Within 20 years of study surgery
|
Did the subject have a revision procedure due to loosening (yes/no)
|
Within 20 years of study surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS Jr.)
Time Frame: PreOperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 5 year, 10 year, 15 year, 20 year
|
Patient-reported outcome of knee stiffness, pain, and function of daily living.
|
PreOperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 5 year, 10 year, 15 year, 20 year
|
|
The Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12)
Time Frame: PreOperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 5 year, 10 year, 15 year, 20 year
|
General Health survey
|
PreOperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 5 year, 10 year, 15 year, 20 year
|
|
Radiographic evidence of loosening
Time Frame: PreOperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 5 year, 10 year, 15 year, 20 year
|
Radiographic evidence of loosening
|
PreOperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 5 year, 10 year, 15 year, 20 year
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)
Time Frame: PreOperative
|
Evaluation of a subject's mortality risk
|
PreOperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Keith A Fehring, MD, OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
- Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, Beard DJ. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2012 Apr 7;379(9823):1331-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
- Fricka KB, Sritulanondha S, McAsey CJ. To Cement or Not? Two-Year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented Vs. Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9 Suppl):55-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.049. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
- Miller AJ, Stimac JD, Smith LS, Feher AW, Yakkanti MR, Malkani AL. Results of Cemented vs Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Same Implant Design. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1089-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.048. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
- Nam D, Lawrie CM, Salih R, Nahhas CR, Barrack RL, Nunley RM. Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty of the Same Modern Design: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jul 3;101(13):1185-1192. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01162.
- Abdel MP, Bonadurer GF 3rd, Jennings MT, Hanssen AD. Increased Aseptic Tibial Failures in Patients With a BMI >/=35 and Well-Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec;30(12):2181-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.057. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
- Brown TE, Harper BL, Bjorgul K. Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2013 May;36(5):380-7. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130426-10.
- Lombardi AV Jr, Berasi CC, Berend KR. Evolution of tibial fixation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4 Suppl 1):25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.02.006.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HK226
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
-
NCT02067533CompletedTotal Knee Replacement | Total Knee Arthroplasty(TKA)
-
NCT06563843RecruitingTotal Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
-
NCT05310474Not yet recruitingTotal Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
-
NCT07456787RecruitingTotal Knee Arthroplasty\(TKA\) | Osteoartrosi
-
NCT07620145CompletedTotal Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) | Knee Flexion Contracture
-
NCT07347821RecruitingHip Osteoarthritis | Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) | Knee Osteoarthristis | Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)
-
NCT05435092Active, not recruitingTotal Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
-
NCT07522489Not yet recruitingTotal Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) | Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee | Knee Pain Arthritis | Robotic Assisted Arthroplasty
-
NCT07437469RecruitingAnxiety | Total Knee Arthroplasty | Total Hip Replacement | Total Knee Replacement | Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) | THA | Music Exposure | TKA | Binaural Beats
Clinical Trials on Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty
-
NCT02839850Active, not recruitingOsteoarthritis
-
NCT07201207Not yet recruiting
-
NCT05877261CompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Arthroplasty, Total | Radiostereometric Analysis
-
NCT06033625CompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Arthroplasty Complications
-
NCT05935878CompletedOsteoarthritis, Knee
-
NCT03424174Active, not recruitingOsteoarthritis
-
NCT02798432Active, not recruitingTotal Knee Arthroplasty