Cool Prime Comparative Effectiveness Study for Mild HIE (COOLPRIME)

April 28, 2026 updated by: Lina Chalak, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

COOLPRIME: Comparative Effectiveness for Cooling Prospectively Infants With Mild Encephalopathy

To determine effectiveness of therapy to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants with mild HIE. To determine the adverse effects of Therapeutic Hypothermia (TH) in mild HIE on the neonate and his/her family. Determine heterogeneity of the treatment effect across key subgroups obtained in the first 6 hours after birth prior to the decision to initiate therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study leverages practice variation within and across 15 participating sites to compare the effectiveness of TH versus normothermia for mild HIE on neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age.After standardizing all aspects of clinical care for mild HIE (except for TH vs. normothermia)we will enroll 460 infants with mild HIE into the longitudinal, observational comparative effectiveness study.The central aim of the comparative longitudinal cohort of mild HIE is (1) to compare the effectiveness of hypothermia to normothermia on neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years, (2) determine the adverse effects of TH on the infant and his/her family; and (3) determine the heterogeneity of treatment effects (moderating effect) across mild HIE subgroups as determined by physiological biomarkers obtained during the 6 hours window to initiate hypothermia. The decision to apply TH or normothermia will be entirely determined by practice parameters at each site.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
460

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

8 months and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Term infants ≥ 36 weeks' gestation with evidence of both perinatal event fetal acidosis and encephalopathy on exam.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Infants must meet all 3 inclusion criteria

  1. Neonates born at ≥ 36 0/7 weeks
  2. Mild Encephalopathy on neonatal neurologic exam within 6 hours after birth: defined as presence of at least 2 signs of mild, moderate, or severe encephalopathy with no more than 2 signs in the moderate or severe category.

  3. Perinatal Acidosis based on at least one of the following (A or B):

    1. pH ≤ 7.00 in any cord or first infant gas (arterial, venous, or capillary) within ≤ 60 min OR base deficit ≥ 16 in any cord or first infant gas (arterial, venous or capillary) within ≤ 60 min
    2. If pH is between 7.01 and 7.15, OR base deficit is between 10 and 15.9 mmol/liter, OR blood gas is not available, an acute perinatal event is an additional criteria required (see below definition)

An acute perinatal event is defined by at least one of the following:

  1. Apgar score at 10 min ≤ 5
  2. Continued need for resuscitation at 10 min (chest compressions, bag mask ventilation, or positive pressure ventilation)
  3. Uterine rupture, placental abruption, cord accident (prolapse, rupture, knot or tight nuchal cord)
  4. maternal trauma, maternal hemorrhage, or cardiorespiratory arrest
  5. fetal exsanguination from either vasa previa or feto-maternal hemorrhage, shoulder dystocia
  6. Any evidence suggestive of acute perinatal event.

Infants are still eligible for enrollment in the COOLPRIME study if the cord or infant's first blood gas (arterial, venous, or capillary) is obtained >60 minutes of life.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Gestational age at birth < 36 0/7 weeks
  2. Birth weight < 1800gm
  3. Head circumference <30cm
  4. Congenital or chromosomal anomaly associated with abnormal neurodevelopment or death
  5. Moderate or Severe HIE of 3 or more moderate or severe abnormalities on COOLPRIME Sarnat exam within 6 hours of life
  6. Any seizures within first six hours of life
  7. Redirection of care is being considered

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Mild HIE
Mild HIE identified in the first 6 hours of life according to the published PRIME study definition: newborn with evidence of encephalopathy (using the validated Sarnat Exam) NOT meeting prior cooling trials criteria.
Procedure: Normothermia
Usual care for first 72 hours for neonates with mild encephalopathy maintaining core temperature (36.5°C ± 1 C).
Procedure: Whole body therapeutic hypothermia
Whole-body therapeutic hypothermia (33.5°C ± 0.5°C) for 72 hours began by 6 hours of age for neonates with mild encephalopathy per site standard of care practice.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness of normothermia in infants as measured by Composite Bayley IV score
Time Frame: 22-26 months of age.
Effectiveness of normothermia in infants is measured by Composite Bayley IV score scale, which is. an extensive formal developmental assessment tool for diagnosing developmental delays in early childhood. Possible scores range from 55- 120 where lower scores indicate worse outcome.
22-26 months of age.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events SAE
Time Frame: Discharge (approximately 7 days)
Safety will be measured by the presence or absence of a serious adverse event (SAE) at discharge.
Discharge (approximately 7 days)
Parent-Infant stress and bonding as measured by MIBS
Time Frame: 3-4 months
Parent-Infant stress and bonding is measured by Mother-to-infant bonding (MIBS) scale, which is a validated questionnaire with good psychometric properties that assesses the mother's feelings towards infant (bondedness) from birth to 4 months. Possible scores range from 0-3, where 0 indicates "not at all" and 3, "very much".
3-4 months
Parent-Infant stress and bonding as measured by IBQR
Time Frame: 3-4 months
Parent-Infant stress and bonding is measured by Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (IBQR) which measures differences in reactivity and regulation, and the structure of infant temperament and its relation to parental family functioning. Item scores were summed according to IBQR scoring rules to create scores on the 14 scales, with higher scores indicating greater levels of that temperament dimension.
3-4 months
Parent-Infant stress and bonding as measured by PSI
Time Frame: 3-4 months
Parent-Infant stress and bonding is measured by Parenting Stress Index (PSI) which is an abbreviated version of the full-length test with 36 items in three domains (Parental Distress, Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction, and Difficult Child) that combine to form a Total Stress scale, which helps identify families that are most in need of support services. In general, items are scored using the following 5-point scale: 1) SA (Strongly Agree), 2) A (Agree), 3) NS (Not Sure), 4) D (Disagree), 5) SD (Strongly Disagree). Responses to both the overall stress score and the three subscales are summed to generate representative scores, resulting the total stress score, perceptions of child behavioral problems, parenting distress, and parent-child dysfunctional interactions.
3-4 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioral tendency CBCL
Time Frame: 22-26 months of age.
The Child Behavior Checklist-parent report (CBCL) will provide a profile of behavior and social functioning validated in relation to age and gender.
22-26 months of age.
Composite PARCA-R
Time Frame: 22-26 months of age.
The Parent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised (PARCA-R) is used against the Mental Development Index of the Bayley Scales.
22-26 months of age.
Infant neurological integrity as measured with HNNE
Time Frame: Discharge
Infant neurological integrity is measured with HNNE (Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Exams), which is used to assess tone, spontaneous movements, reflexes, and visual and auditory attention allowing for a continuum of assessment from birth to 2 years. The maximum score for any one item is a score of 3 and the minimum is a score of 0. A subscore can be given for each section and the overall global score can be calculated by summing up all 26 items (range: 0-78), with higher scores indicating better neurological performance. The maximum global score is 78.
Discharge
Infant neurological integrity as measured with HINE
Time Frame: 3 - 4 months
Infant neurological integrity is measured with HINE (Hammersmith Infant Neurological Exams), which is used to assess tone, spontaneous movements, reflexes, and visual and auditory attention allowing for a continuum of assessment from birth to 2 years. The maximum score for any one item is a score of 3 and the minimum is a score of 0. A subscore can be given for each section and the overall global score can be calculated by summing up all 26 items (range: 0-78), with higher scores indicating better neurological performance. The maximum global score is 78.
3 - 4 months
Infant neurological integrity as measured with HINE
Time Frame: 22-26 months
Infant neurological integrity is measured with HINE (Hammersmith Infant Neurological Exams), which is used to assess tone, spontaneous movements, reflexes, and visual and auditory attention allowing for a continuum of assessment from birth to 2 years. The maximum score for any one item is a score of 3 and the minimum is a score of 0. A subscore can be given for each section and the overall global score can be calculated by summing up all 26 items (range: 0-78), with higher scores indicating better neurological performance. The maximum global score is 78.
22-26 months
IFS-R
Time Frame: 9-12 months
Impact on Family Scale - Revised
9-12 months
IBQ-R
Time Frame: 9-12months
Infant Behavior Questionnaire Revised (very short)
9-12months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Washington University School of Medicine
The Cleveland Clinic
Emory University
University of California, San Francisco
Stanford University
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
University of Utah
Children's National Research Institute
Harvard University
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Children's Hospital of Orange County
University College Cork
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
St. Louis University
Sharp HealthCare
University of Florida Health
The Children's Hospital of San Antonio

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lina Chalak, MD, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 19, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 28, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STU-2022-0714
  • R01NS102617-06A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings