Effect of Carotid Artery Stent on Evoked Cerebral Blood Oxygenation and Neurocognitive Functioning

May 27, 2024 updated by: Yueqi Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital
Cerebral hemodynamic compromise from internal carotid artery stenosis may be a cause of vascular cognitive impairment that is amenable to treatment by revascularization. The effect of carotid artery stent on evoked cerebral blood oxygenation and neurocognitive functioning will be evaluated by functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Carotid artery stent could benefit cerebral blood oxygenation after stent and improving neurocognitive functioning after 6 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with high grade internal carotid artery stenosis intended to carotid artery stent are brought to this study. Global cognitive function and evoked cerebral blood oxygenation are evaluated before and after stent, followed up at 6 months later. Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are used for the global cognitive test. Evoked cerebral blood oxygenation is evaluated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy(fNIRS) through performing mental task( N-back task, Go/no go task, and verbal fluency task ). All the patients from different centers are conducted the test at the only main center by one doctor. The parameter of fNIRS and score of cognitive test of each patient are compared before and after stent.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
74

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Shanghai, China, 200023
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai 6th People's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yue-Qi Zhu, Dr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with high grade carotid artery stenosis treated with carotid artery stent from 5 hospitals.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 35-80 years old
  2. Severe carotid stenosis (MRA or CTA confirmed stenosis rate of 70% - 99%, NASCET standard)
  3. Asymptomatic or mild stroke (NIHSS ≤ 3) or TIA
  4. Agree to participate in the clinical trial and sign the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe stenosis or occlusion of vertebrobasilar artery and other intracranial arteries (70% - 99%)
  2. Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% or heart failure
  3. Other types of dementia have been diagnosed
  4. Severe depression, mental illness, epilepsy
  5. Not cooperating with cognitive task evaluation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of cognitive function score
Time Frame: MMSE score at baseline, 6 months after revascularization. Change of the score is calculated.
Mini-mental State Examination (0-30 points), the higher the score, the better the cognitive function
MMSE score at baseline, 6 months after revascularization. Change of the score is calculated.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parameter of evoked cerebral blood oxygenation
Time Frame: Evoked cerebral blood oxygenation evaluated after stent immediately, 6 months later, compared with that at baseline.
Means of HbO detected by functional near-infrared spectroscopy
Evoked cerebral blood oxygenation evaluated after stent immediately, 6 months later, compared with that at baseline.
Parameter of evoked cerebral blood oxygenation
Time Frame: Evoked cerebral blood oxygenation evaluated after stent immediately, 6 months later, compared with that at baseline.
Skewness of HbO detected by functional near-infrared spectroscopy
Evoked cerebral blood oxygenation evaluated after stent immediately, 6 months later, compared with that at baseline.
Parameter of evoked cerebral blood oxygenation
Time Frame: Evoked cerebral blood oxygenation evaluated after stent immediately, 6 months later, compared with that at baseline.
kurtosis of HbO detected by functional near-infrared spectroscopy
Evoked cerebral blood oxygenation evaluated after stent immediately, 6 months later, compared with that at baseline.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
RenJi Hospital
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
ShuGuang Hospital
Minhang Hospital, Fudan University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yueqi Zhu, PhD, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 27, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CAS-fNIRS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carotid Artery Stenosis

Clinical Trials on MMSE, MoCA, functional near-infrared spectroscopy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings