Artificial Intelligence in Depression - Medication Enhancement (AID-ME)
Artificial Intelligence in Depression - Medication Enhancement: A Randomized, Patient and Rater Blinded, Active-Controlled Trial of a Hybrid-Classic/Machine-Learning Enabled Clinical Decision Aid for Personalized and Individualized Pharmacological Depression Treatment Selection
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M6J1H4
- CAMH: The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
-
-
Quebec
-
Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H1N3V2
- CIUSSS de l'Est-de-l'Ile-de-Montreal
-
Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H3T1E2
- CIUSSS De Centre Ouest De L'île de Montréal
-
Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H4A3J1
- McGill University Health Care Centre (MUHC)
-
Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H4H1R3
- CIUSSS De L'Ouest de L'île de Montréal
-
Verdun, Quebec, Canada, H4H 1R3
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute
-
-
-
-
Connecticut
-
West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516
- VA New Haven, VA Connecticut Healthcare System
-
-
Florida
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33125
- South Florida Veterans Affairs
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- Emory University
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
- University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine
-
-
Virginia
-
Salem, Virginia, United States, 24153
- Salem Vamc
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosed with major depressive disorder by a physician using DSM-V criteria
- able to provide informed consent
- patients must confirm that they are comfortable being treated for depression by their physician, who may propose a range of treatment options, such as medications or psychotherapies, consistent with best practice guidelines for depression which are included in the application. Physicians will be required, as in usual practice, to explain treatments to patients and patients will be able to give and withdraw consent for treatment in general or for specific treatments as in usual practice.
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
- bipolar disorder of any type
- inability or unwillingness of the individual to give informed consent
- inability to manage patient in an outpatient setting (i.e. imminent suicidality)
- active major depression is not the main condition being treated (i.e. the patient has depressive symptoms in the context of severe substance abuse or a psychotic disorder, but a primary diagnosis of major depressive episode (MDE) cannot be made or would result in inappropriate care).
- inability to use the tool (i.e. patient cannot interface with a mobile phone or computer due to delirium, or another medical condition)* *Note that for patients who do not have access to mobile or desktop devices but are able to use them or to be trained to use them, these will be provided to them at no cost.
Physician Inclusion Criteria:
- any family doctor/primary care physician or psychiatrist accredited in Canada or the USA who treats patients with depression on at least a monthly basis, as well as residents from these specialities supervised by a participating physician
- able to provide informed consent
- comfortable prescribing the range of potential treatments which could have probabilities provided for them by the CDA
No Physician Exclusion Criteria
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Active Intervention
Intervention delivered to patients by digital health platform.
|
Clinical Decision Support System using Measurement-Based Care and Digital Decision Support Platform
|
|
Active Comparator: Active Control
Intervention delivered to patients by digital health platform.
|
Clinical Decision Support System using Measurement-Based Care and Digital Decision Support Platform
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Safety - Adverse Events
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Adverse and Serious Adverse Events
|
3 months
|
|
Effectiveness in Reduction of Depression Symptoms
Time Frame: 3 months
|
This is approved as a physician partially-blinded study and, as such, physicians are blinded to the primary outcome.
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Remission
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To evaluate time to remission between groups.
The hypothesis is that time to remission will be shorter in the active intervention group compared to the active control group.
|
3 months
|
|
Response Rate
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To evaluate response rate between groups.
The hypothesis is that the response rate (defined as 50% improvement in symptoms) and time to response, will be higher and lower, respectively, in the active intervention group compared to the active control group.
|
3 months
|
|
Patient Disability with WHODAS rating scale
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To evaluate between-group differences in patient disability outcomes.
The hypothesis is that the physicians in the active intervention arm will produce superior patient outcomes to those physicians using usual guideline-informed practice, in terms of patient function as measured by a rating scale (WHODAS).
|
3 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of ER visits, admissions, and re-admissions
Time Frame: 3 months
|
We will examine impact of health resource utilization by comparing rates of visits, admissions, and re-admissions between groups.
|
3 months
|
|
Medication Adherence Rates
Time Frame: 3 months
|
We will asses medication adherence rates, as measured by the Brief Adherence Rating Scale, after each visit for the duration of the study and compare between groups.
|
3 months
|
|
Patient Questionnaire Response Rate
Time Frame: 3 months
|
We will assess the frequency at which patients complete the questionnaires in the digital health platform in both groups.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IUSMD 18-04
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.