Clinical Evaluation of a Bulk Fill Resin Composite
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294-0007
- UAB School of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Each subject must need at least 1 restoration in a vital posterior tooth
- Must have given written consent to participate in the trial
- Replacement of defective restorations (i.e. fractured, stained, unaesthetic) with or with-out caries are acceptable
- Must be available for the required follow-up visits over 3 years
- Restored teeth must have occlusal contact with opposing teeth or restored teeth
- Restoration width should be equal to or greater than 1/3 the distance from buccal to lin-gual cusp tips
- 75% of the restorations Class II (minimum) and 25% Class I
- Each Class II will have at least one proximal contact
- 75% in molars (minimum) and 25% in premolars
- All restored teeth must have at least one occlusal contact in habitual closure
- Must have 20 or more teeth
Exclusion Criteria:
- If they have an allergy to ingredients of the materials under investigation (monomers)
- Do not meet all inclusion criteria above
- Have severe medical complications (organ transplants, long term antibiotic or steroid treatment, cancer or are immunocompromised) or disabilities meaning they may not be able to tolerate the time required to complete the restorations or to provide adequate oral hygiene
- Have xerostomia either by taking medications known to produce xerostomia or those with radiation-induced xerostomia or Sjogren's syndrome - as dry mouth increases tooth and restoration wear as well as the development of caries.
- Have teeth with advanced or severe periodontitis, rampant caries or poor oral hygiene which may require extraction of the teeth to be restored
- Present with any systemic or local disorders that contraindicate the dental procedures included in this study
- Have unstable occlusion
- Have severe grinding/bruxing or clenching or need TMJ-related therapy
- Have tooth with exposed pulp during preparation or caries removal
- Teeth that are non-vital or that exhibit signs of pulpal pathology for restoration
- Teeth that require cuspal build-ups involving more than one cusp
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Tetric PowerFill Class I and II restorations
|
Tooth (teeth) affected by dental caries or with an existing defective filling will be restored using the PowerCure system.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
FDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity
Time Frame: Baseline
|
assessed by tests with thermal stimuli and occlusal forces (during biting) determined by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 "No pain at all" - 10 "The worst pain imaginable") following the FDI criteria on a scale from 1 "very good" to 5 "unacceptable"
|
Baseline
|
|
Pulp Integrity
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Restored teeth are assessed by a cold air stimuli test (air syringe) by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 "No pain at all" - 10 "The worst pain imaginable")
|
Baseline
|
|
Overall Survival Rate
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Restorations were examined by a dentist
|
Baseline
|
|
FDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity
Time Frame: 6 Month
|
assessed by tests with thermal stimuli and occlusal forces (during biting) determined by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 "No pain at all" - 10 "The worst pain imaginable") following the FDI criteria on a scale from 1 "very good" to 5 "unacceptable"
|
6 Month
|
|
Pulp Integrity
Time Frame: 6 Month
|
Restored teeth are assessed by a cold air stimuli test (air syringe) by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 "No pain at all" - 10 "The worst pain imaginable")
|
6 Month
|
|
Overall Survival Rate
Time Frame: 6 Month
|
Restorations were examined by a dentist
|
6 Month
|
|
FDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity
Time Frame: 12 Month
|
assessed by tests with thermal stimuli and occlusal forces (during biting) determined by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 "No pain at all" - 10 "The worst pain imaginable") following the FDI criteria on a scale from 1 "very good" to 5 "unacceptable"
|
12 Month
|
|
Pulp Integrity
Time Frame: 12 Month
|
Restored teeth are assessed by a cold air stimuli test (air syringe) by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 "No pain at all" - 10 "The worst pain imaginable")
|
12 Month
|
|
Overall Survival Rate
Time Frame: 12 Month
|
Restorations were examined by a dentist
|
12 Month
|
|
FDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity
Time Frame: 24 Month
|
assessed by tests with thermal stimuli and occlusal forces (during biting) determined by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 "No pain at all" - 10 "The worst pain imaginable") following the FDI criteria on a scale from 1 "very good" to 5 "unacceptable"
|
24 Month
|
|
Pulp Integrity
Time Frame: 24 Month
|
Restored teeth are assessed by a cold air stimuli test (air syringe) by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 "No pain at all" - 10 "The worst pain imaginable")
|
24 Month
|
|
Overall Survival Rate
Time Frame: 24 Month
|
Restorations were examined by a dentist
|
24 Month
|
|
FDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity
Time Frame: 36 Month
|
assessed by tests with thermal stimuli and occlusal forces (during biting) determined by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 "No pain at all" - 10 "The worst pain imaginable") following the FDI criteria on a scale from 1 "very good" to 5 "unacceptable"
|
36 Month
|
|
Pulp Integrity
Time Frame: 36 Month
|
Restored teeth are assessed by a cold air stimuli test (air syringe) by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 "No pain at all" - 10 "The worst pain imaginable")
|
36 Month
|
|
Overall Survival Rate
Time Frame: 36 Month
|
Restorations were examined by a dentist
|
36 Month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
FDI Criteria (Surface Lustre, Surface Staining, Colour Match, Material Fracture, Occlusal Wear, Tooth Integrity)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
assessed following the FDI criteria on a scale from 1 "very good" to 5 "unacceptable"
|
Baseline
|
|
FDI Criteria (Surface Lustre, Surface Staining, Colour Match, Material Fracture, Occlusal Wear, Tooth Integrity)
Time Frame: 6 Month
|
assessed following the FDI criteria on a scale from 1 "very good" to 5 "unacceptable"
|
6 Month
|
|
FDI Criteria (Surface Lustre, Surface Staining, Colour Match, Material Fracture, Occlusal Wear, Tooth Integrity)
Time Frame: 12 Month
|
assessed following the FDI criteria on a scale from 1 "very good" to 5 "unacceptable"
|
12 Month
|
|
FDI Criteria (Surface Lustre, Surface Staining, Colour Match, Material Fracture, Occlusal Wear, Tooth Integrity)
Time Frame: 24 Month
|
assessed following the FDI criteria on a scale from 1 "very good" to 5 "unacceptable"
|
24 Month
|
|
FDI Criteria (Surface Lustre, Surface Staining, Colour Match, Material Fracture, Occlusal Wear, Tooth Integrity)
Time Frame: 36 Month
|
assessed following the FDI criteria on a scale from 1 "very good" to 5 "unacceptable"
|
36 Month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nathaniel Lawson, Dr, UAB School of Dentistry
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- LL3079573
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.