Implant Supported Single Crowns With Different Retention Modes
Implant Supported Single Crowns With Different Retention Modes - Effects on Peri-implant Tissue: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Elisabeth Steyer, Dr.
- Phone Number: 0043 69911221489
- Email: elisabeth.amberger@medunigraz.at
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Norbert Jakse, UnivProfDDr
- Phone Number: 82921 0043 316 385
- Email: norbert.jakse@medunigraz.at
Study Locations
-
-
-
Graz, Austria, 8010
- Medical University of Graz, Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Division of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- capability of giving an informed consent
- good health as defined by the subjects medical history (no contraindications as described in the exclusion criteria below)
- age 18 to 99 years
- Good periodontal status: BOP < 20%, PI < 30%, no PD > 4mm
- No heavy smokers (< 10 cigarettes/day)
- at least 1 missing tooth in the premolar and molar region (with at least a mesial neighboring tooth/implant showing adequate hard- and soft tissue situation without the need of crestal hard- or soft tissue augmentation) either in the maxilla or in the mandible requiring implant therapy for reconstruction, requiring sinus floor augmentation or not.
Exclusion Criteria
- Insufficient bone volume for implant placement requiring GBR (guided bone regeneration) procedure in crestal area.
- Heavy Smokers (>10 cigarettes/day)
- Medication with a contraindication for implant therapy (especially antiresorptive therapy, ongoing or recently completed local radiotherapy, systematic diseases, ongoing immunosuppressive therapy, functional disorders like Bruxism).
- Skeletal immaturity.
- Any active malignancy or ongoing treatment for malignancy.
- An active infection (e.g. caries, gingivitis, periodontitis) at or in the neighboring area of the operative site.
- Pregnancy
- unable or unwilling to return for follow-up visits for a period of at least 16 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: conometric concept (Acuris system)
single implant crown retention using friction only
|
implant crown retention type using friction only
|
|
Active Comparator: screw retention
screw retained implant Crown fixation
|
screw retained implant crown
|
|
Active Comparator: cementation
cement retained implant Crown fixation
|
cement retained implant crown
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of marginal bone level
Time Frame: at baseline, 4 months after implant placement and 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration
|
assessed by single tooth x-ray; in mm
|
at baseline, 4 months after implant placement and 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration
|
|
Change of matrix metalloproteinase 8 level
Time Frame: 4 months after implant placement, 3, 6 and 12 months after integration of the implant crown
|
biomarker for Inflammation of peri-implant disease; in ng/ml
|
4 months after implant placement, 3, 6 and 12 months after integration of the implant crown
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of probing depth (PD)
Time Frame: at baseline, 4, 7, 10, 16 months after implantation
|
using a periodontal probe; in mm
|
at baseline, 4, 7, 10, 16 months after implantation
|
|
Number of occurrences of chipping
Time Frame: measured after integration of implant crown 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration
|
visual check
|
measured after integration of implant crown 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration
|
|
soft tissue maintenance
Time Frame: measured 4 months after implant placement and 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration
|
Papilla Index (Jemt T, 1997), the index ranges from 0 to 4, while 2 and 3 indicate physiological outcome
|
measured 4 months after implant placement and 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration
|
|
technician satisfaction
Time Frame: measured 12 months after restoration
|
evaluated using an individual questionnaire
|
measured 12 months after restoration
|
|
dentist satisfaction
Time Frame: measured 12 months after restoration
|
evaluated using an individual questionnaire
|
measured 12 months after restoration
|
|
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: measured at baseline, 3 and 12 months after restoration
|
evaluated using OHIP-G 14 questionnaire.
The following dimensions are captured by the OHIP-G 14: functional Limitation (e.g., "pronouncing any words because of problems with your teeth, mouth, dentures, or jaw?") and physical Pain (e.g., "Have you had painful aching in your mouth").
14 questions are raised, which are answered using a rating scale from 0 (never) to 4 (very often).
|
measured at baseline, 3 and 12 months after restoration
|
|
Plaque Index (PI)
Time Frame: at baseline, 4, 7, 10 and 16 months after implantation
|
in percent
|
at baseline, 4, 7, 10 and 16 months after implantation
|
|
Bleeding on Probing (BOP)
Time Frame: at baseline, 4, 7, 10 and 16 months after implantation
|
in percent
|
at baseline, 4, 7, 10 and 16 months after implantation
|
|
Patient satisfaction concerning the implant crown
Time Frame: measured 12 months after restoration
|
evaluated using an individual questionnaire
|
measured 12 months after restoration
|
|
Number of occurrences of fractures
Time Frame: measured after integration of implant crown 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration
|
visual check
|
measured after integration of implant crown 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration
|
|
Number of occurrences of screw loosening
Time Frame: measured after integration of implant crown 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration
|
visual check
|
measured after integration of implant crown 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration
|
|
Number of occurrences of crown loosening
Time Frame: measured after integration of implant crown 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration
|
visual check
|
measured after integration of implant crown 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Norbert Jakse, UnivProfDDr, Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:68-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x.
- Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997 Aug;17(4):326-33.
- DeCarlo AA, Grenett HE, Harber GJ, Windsor LJ, Bodden MK, Birkedal-Hansen B, Birkedal-Hansen H. Induction of matrix metalloproteinases and a collagen-degrading phenotype in fibroblasts and epithelial cells by secreted Porphyromonas gingivalis proteinase. J Periodontal Res. 1998 Oct;33(7):408-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1998.tb02337.x.
- Kraus RD, Epprecht A, Hammerle CHF, Sailer I, Thoma DS. Cemented vs screw-retained zirconia-based single implant reconstructions: A 3-year prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Aug;21(4):578-585. doi: 10.1111/cid.12735. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
- Lekholm U, Adell R, Lindhe J, Branemark PI, Eriksson B, Rockler B, Lindvall AM, Yoneyama T. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. (II) A cross-sectional retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Feb;15(1):53-61. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(86)80011-4.
- Lemos CA, de Souza Batista VE, Almeida DA, Santiago Junior JF, Verri FR, Pellizzer EP. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Apr;115(4):419-27. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.026. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
- Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Wegscheider W, Keil C, Penkner K, Polansky R, Bratschko RO. Retrospective analysis of Frialit-2 implants in the augmented sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000 Jun;20(3):255-67.
- Ma J, Kitti U, Teronen O, Sorsa T, Husa V, Laine P, Ronka H, Salo T, Lindqvist C, Konttinen YT. Collagenases in different categories of peri-implant vertical bone loss. J Dent Res. 2000 Nov;79(11):1870-3. doi: 10.1177/00220345000790110901.
- Meissen R, Mintcheva M, Netuschil L. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 levels in peri-implant sulcus fluid adjacent to titanium and zirconium nitride surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;34(1):91-5. doi: 10.11607/prd.1504.
- Penarrocha-Oltra D, Monreal-Bello A, Penarrocha-Diago M, Alonso-Perez-Barquero J, Botticelli D, Canullo L. Microbial Colonization of the Peri-Implant Sulcus and Implant Connection of Implants Restored With Cemented Versus Screw-Retained Superstructures: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Periodontol. 2016 Sep;87(9):1002-11. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160017. Epub 2016 May 6.
- Sailer I, Muhlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH, Schneider D. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:163-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02538.x.
- Sorsa T, Tjaderhane L, Konttinen YT, Lauhio A, Salo T, Lee HM, Golub LM, Brown DL, Mantyla P. Matrix metalloproteinases: contribution to pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of periodontal inflammation. Ann Med. 2006;38(5):306-21. doi: 10.1080/07853890600800103.
- Sorsa T, Hernandez M, Leppilahti J, Munjal S, Netuschil L, Mantyla P. Detection of gingival crevicular fluid MMP-8 levels with different laboratory and chair-side methods. Oral Dis. 2010 Jan;16(1):39-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01603.x. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
- Thoma DS, Sailer I, Muhlemann S, Gil A, Jung RE, Hammerle CHF. Randomized controlled clinical study of veneered zirconia abutments for single implant crowns: Clinical, histological, and microbiological outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Dec;20(6):988-996. doi: 10.1111/cid.12674. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
- Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Maslova N, Linkeviciene L, Peciuliene V, Linkevicius T. Clinical Factors Influencing Removal of the Cement Excess in Implant-Supported Restorations. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Aug;17(4):771-8. doi: 10.1111/cid.12170. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 32-578 ex 19/20
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.