Safety and Efficacy of a Lipiodol Emulsion for the Embolization of Hypervascularizations in Patients With Knee Pain (LipioJoint1) (LipioJoint1)

August 2, 2023 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Prospective Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the Use of a Lipiodol Emulsion for the Embolization of Inflammatory Hypervascularizations Observed in Patients With Joint or Abarticular Knee Pain

Knee osteoarthritis is a common cause of disability in patients who are often young and active. Surgery being an option only for the most severe cases, there is little alternative in case of failure of recommended medication. Inflammatory hypervascularization of the joint is a known source of pain. Temporary embolization of intra-arterial inflammatory hypervascularization has been used since 2012 with good results on pain relief to treat patients with musculoskeletal disorders that are resistant to conventional treatments. Lipiodol® has transient embolizing properties when in emulsion with a contrast agent. It has been used as an emulsion with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastases and primary intra-arterial liver cancer (chemo-embolization) for many years without serious side effects. We hypothesized that Lipiodol® in emulsion could serve as a temporary embolization agent for the treatment of inflammatory hypervascularization responsible for musculoskeletal disorders in humans.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

It is a Phase 1, Single-Arm, Open-label, Multicenter Interventional Prospective Study.

In order to ensure the best possible patient safety, a sequential inclusion of the first 6 patients is planned. Thus, the inclusion of each subsequent patient (patient 2-6) will only be considered after reviewing previously included patient safety data. Safety data after the inclusion of each patient (after a step-back of at least one week), as well as the cumulative review of previously included patient safety data, will be brought to the attention of all investigators involved in this research.

In addition, the following information will be transmitted to the Competent Authority without delay:

  • a review of the safety and efficacy of the first 3 patients included with a step back for the last patient of at least one week after the administration of the experimental drug, as well as an argument as to the continuation of this research with regard to these data, with a discussion of the risks incurred in relation to the expected profit
  • a review of the safety and effectiveness of the first 3 patients after the inclusion of the first 6 patients, as well as an argument as to the continuation of this research with regard to these data, with a discussion of the risks incurred compared to the expected benefit.

The patients will be embolized by the Interventional Radiology Department of the European Hospital Georges Pompidou (HEGP). Embolization will be performed by an experienced radiologist during a conventional hospitalization or a day hospitalization. A clinical follow-up will be carried out at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after embolization by clinics and patient self-assessment (WOMAC, SF-36).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

31 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of primary inflammatory knee osteoarthritis of the target joint defined by a knee osteoarthritis according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification and a score ≥ 2 according to the classification of Kellgren and Lawrence
  • Patient not eligible for surgery (or refusing surgery)
  • Analog Visual Scale (VAS) pain ≥ 40 mm despite analgesic treatment for at least 3 months
  • Failure or intolerance of treatment with NSAIDs and/or tramadol and/or acetaminophen, and/or failure or intolerance or patient refusing strong opioids medication (morphine, codeine)
  • Failure or patient refusal of corticosteroid infiltration
  • Patient who has signed an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who is unable or unable to comply with the follow-up schedule
  • Infiltration of target joint less than three months old
  • Treated hyperthyroidism
  • Traumatic injury, hemorrhage or bleeding less than 1 week old in the target joint
  • Known arterial disease of the lower limbs stage ≥ 2 according to the classification of Leriche and Fontaine
  • Known severe allergy to Lipiodol® and/or iodized contrast product
  • Known severe kidney failure (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Patient not affiliated with a French Medicare
  • Patient benefiting from legal protection
  • Participation in another interventional research

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Embolization
Embolization of the inflammatory hypervascularization with a lipiodol emulsion
Drug: Lipiodol
Lipiodol in emulsion with contrast agent
Other Names:
  • Optiray

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Time Frame: 1 month
Number of SAE related to Embolization
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Immediate Technical success
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Success of catheterization and embolization of target hypervascularization
Intraoperative
Pain improvement 1 week after embolization
Time Frame: 1 week
Analog Visual Scale score (0-100) comparison to baseline VAS score is determined by measuring in millimetres from the left hand end of the line to the point that the patients marks. The Scale is rated from 0 to 100 (no pain to extremely severe pain)
1 week
Pain improvement 1 month after embolization
Time Frame: 1 month
Analog Visual Scale score (0-100) comparison to baseline VAS score is determined by measuring in millimetres from the left hand end of the line to the point that the patients marks. The Scale is rated from 0 to 100 (no pain to extremely severe pain)
1 month
Pain improvement 3 month after embolization
Time Frame: 3 months
Analog Visual Scale score (0-100) comparison to baseline VAS score is determined by measuring in millimetres from the left hand end of the line to the point that the patients marks. The Scale is rated from 0 to 100 (no pain to extremely severe pain)
3 months
Articular impotence improvement 1 week after embolization
Time Frame: 1 week
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (0-96) comparison to baseline
1 week
Articular impotence improvement 1 month after embolization
Time Frame: 1 month
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (0-96) comparison to baseline
1 month
Articular impotence improvement 3 month after embolization
Time Frame: 3 months
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (0-96) comparison to baseline
3 months
Quality of life improvement 3 month after embolization
Time Frame: 3 months
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score comparison to baseline SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section, a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
3 months
Pain medication improvement 1 week after embolization
Time Frame: 1 week
Dose of analgesic medication compared to baseline (mg/24h)
1 week
Pain medication improvement 1 month after embolization
Time Frame: 1 month
Dose of analgesic medication compared to baseline (mg/24h)
1 month
Pain medication improvement 3 month after embolization
Time Frame: 3 months
Dose of analgesic medication compared to baseline (mg/24h)
3 months
Patient's satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 months
Patient's satisfaction questionnaire : qualitative questionnaire with 5 ordered modalities (0 = no to 4 = yes)
3 months
Adverse Events (AE)
Time Frame: 3 months
Number of AE related to embolization
3 months
Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Time Frame: 3 months
Number of SAE related to embolization
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Guerbet

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marc MD Sapoval, PhD, AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 20, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 2, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • APHP190891
  • 2020-002206-10 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in publication could be shared. IPD detailed in the protocol of a planned metaanalysis could be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

2 years after the last publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data sharing must be accepted by the sponsor and the PI based on a scientific project and scientific involvement of the PI team. Collaboration will be fostered.

Data sharing must respect the agreements made with funders.

Teams wishing obtain IPD must meet the sponsor and IP team to present scientific (and commercial) purpose, IPD needed, format of data transmission, and timeframe. Technical feasibility and financial support will be discussed before mandatory contractual agreement.

Processing of shared data must comply with European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Teams wishing obtain IPD must meet the sponsor and IP team to present scientific (and commercial) purpose, IPD needed, format of data transmission, and timeframe. Technical feasibility and financial support will be discussed before mandatory contracting

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Lipiodol

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings