ROVUS Asia Registry (Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Rotational Atherectomy and Intravascular Ultrasound for Heavily Calcified Coronary Lesion) (ROVUS)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: James Low
- Phone Number: 67042280
- Email: james.low.j.y@nhcs.com.sg
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Phoebe Chin
- Phone Number: 67042268
- Email: chin.ting.ting@nhcs.com.sg
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Able to understand and sign an informed consent form
- Presence of clinical indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and/or stent placement
- Subjects willing to comply with all research and follow-up requirements.
Angiographic criteria (ONE of the following criteria MUST be met)
- Target lesions visually have at least moderate calcifications*
- Target lesion balloon dilatation failure
- Inability of devices (microcatheters, balloons or stents) to pass through the target lesion.
Procedural criteria
All patients treated with RA with or without other forms of debulking therapy
- Moderate calcification is defined as radio-opacities noted only during cardiac cycle prior to contrast injection whereas severe calcification is defined as radio-opacities seen without cardiac motion prior to contrast injection, usually affecting both sides of the arterial lumen.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Decline to give consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Eligible subjects who underwent RA prior to PCI (with informed consent taken to join the study)
Informed consent to be obtained either prior to PCI with rotational atherectomy planned or within 48 hours after rotational atherectomy.
There will be data collection of history/demographics, laboratory results, symptoms, any serious adverse events recording for this cohort as well as a telephone follow up at 12months post rotational atherectomy.
|
Rotational atherectomy (RA) has been the most used atherectomy modality since its first inception in1988.
RA uses high speed rotation (140,000 - 180,000 rpm) to ablate inelastic plaque, resulting in debris averaging 5µm in size24.
The main focus of RA in the era of DES stent has been on plaque modification rather that plaque debulking with more papers showing improved PCI success rates.
|
|
Eligible subjects who underwent RA prior to PCI (without informed consent taken to join the study)
Subjects that were demised or refused to give consent will fall under this cohort.
The data collection of this cohort will be done through screening of in-hospital data via available local PCI database/registry.
|
Rotational atherectomy (RA) has been the most used atherectomy modality since its first inception in1988.
RA uses high speed rotation (140,000 - 180,000 rpm) to ablate inelastic plaque, resulting in debris averaging 5µm in size24.
The main focus of RA in the era of DES stent has been on plaque modification rather that plaque debulking with more papers showing improved PCI success rates.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary efficacy endpoint (Procedural success)
Time Frame: Duration of procedure
|
Procedural success defined as < 20% residual stenosis in treated segment without on-table mortality with TIMI 3 flow.
|
Duration of procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Death
Time Frame: 1 year
|
in-hospital and at 1-year follow-up
|
1 year
|
|
Periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI)
Time Frame: within 48 hours of procedure
|
|
within 48 hours of procedure
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: within 48 hours of procedure
|
Significant coronary perforation at least Type II, III or III CS based on Ellis classification
|
within 48 hours of procedure
|
|
Complication
Time Frame: within 48 hours of procedure
|
no-reflow or slow flow
|
within 48 hours of procedure
|
|
Procedural time
Time Frame: Duration of procedure
|
Time of guide engagement to removal of guide
|
Duration of procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Khung Keong Yeo, Singhealth Foundation
- Principal Investigator: Shoichi Kuramitsu, Kokura Memorial Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lee MS, Park KW, Shlofmitz E, Shlofmitz RA. Comparison of Rotational Atherectomy Versus Orbital Atherectomy for the Treatment of Heavily Calcified Coronary Plaques. Am J Cardiol. 2017 May 1;119(9):1320-1323. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.01.025. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
- Sharma SK, Tomey MI, Teirstein PS, Kini AS, Reitman AB, Lee AC, Genereux P, Chambers JW, Grines CL, Himmelstein SI, Thompson CA, Meredith IT, Bhave A, Moses JW. North American Expert Review of Rotational Atherectomy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May;12(5):e007448. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007448.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020/2932
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.