IDEAL Blood Pressure Management During Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke (IDEAL)

June 10, 2022 updated by: University of Aarhus

IDEAL Blood Pressure Management During Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke:A Feasibility Study of Randomisation to Individual vs. Fixed Blood Pressure Targets During Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

The ideal blood pressure management strategy during endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke has not been defined. The aim of this pilot randomized clinical trial is to determine whether randomization to a standard versus individual blood pressure management strategy during the EVT procedure is feasible.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of death and long-term disability in the Western world. Catheter-based removal of blood clots (endovascular therapy-EVT) is now the standard of care for AIS caused by large vessel occlusions in the brain. The level of blood pressure during the procedure appears to influence outcome. However, optimal blood pressure management strategy has not been determined. Current blood pressure management strategy during EVT typically aims to maintain blood pressure above or within predefined fixed targets and is based on observational data and expert consensus rather than on high-quality randomized evidence. Should blood pressure during removal of the occlusion be managed according to the patient's individual blood pressure level or according to predefined fixed blood pressure targets? The primary aim of this pilot trial is to determine whether randomization to a procedure strategy targeting a predefined mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) of 70-90 mmHg versus an individual strategy targeting ± 10 % of a MABP reference value is feasible. Secondary aims are to test recruitability and to detect challenges or obstacles that would call for changes in the study design.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8200
        • Aarhus University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Large vessel occlusion in anterior circulation in patients deemed treatable with EVT.
  • Living independently (mRS < 2) before stroke.
  • EVT procedure feasible within 24 hours of symptom onset.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contra-indication/allergy to contrast agents, vasopressor agents or anaesthetics.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Medical condition where blood pressure targeting will be problematic (aorta dissection, etc).
  • Participation in another trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Individual blood pressure management arm
During the EVT procedure(in general anesthesia), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) during is targeted to remain within +/- 10 % of a reference value using vasoactive drugs and/or fluids
Procedure: Individualized blood pressure management
During the EVT procedure, mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) is targeted to remain within +/- 10 % of a reference value using vasoactive drugs and/or fluids
Active Comparator: Standard blood pressure management arm
During the EVT procedure(in general anesthesia), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) during is targeted to remain within a fixed range of 70-90 mmHg
Procedure: Standard blood pressure management
During the EVT procedure, mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) is targeted to remain within a fixed range of 70-90 mmHg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3-month Modified Rankin Score (mRS). The mRS is a functional outcome score rankin from 0(best outcome) to 6 (death)
Time Frame: Assessed up to 3 months after endovascular treatment
Functional outcome measure
Assessed up to 3 months after endovascular treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate (percentage)
Time Frame: Assessed up 3 months after endovascular treatment
Percentage of admitted patients scheduled for EVT who is enrolled in the study
Assessed up 3 months after endovascular treatment
Adherence to mean arterial blood pressure targets. Specifically, to determine the percentage of time outside the target treatment range
Time Frame: Assessed 3 months after endovascular treatment
...Percentage of time outside the blood pressure targets
Assessed 3 months after endovascular treatment
Data completeness (percentage)
Time Frame: Assessed up to 3 months after endovascular treatment
Percentage of complete patient data study records
Assessed up to 3 months after endovascular treatment
Degree of reperfusion
Time Frame: Assessed up to 3 months after endovascular treatment
Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Score (TICI) score. The TICI score is a grading scale for angiographic outcomes rankin from 0 (no perfusion) to 3(complete perfusion)
Assessed up to 3 months after endovascular treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Criteria for continuation to the definitive trial
Time Frame: Assessed up to 3 months after endovascular treatment

The two arms are distinguishable on 3-month mRS with a trend statistical significant p-value below 0.1 or all of the following:

  • Drop out rate is less than 10%
  • Data completion is above 90%
  • (A cumulated duration of 10 minutes outside the MABP targets is allowed) Additional cumulated time outside the respective MABP target range is on average less than 8% of the duration of the intervention
Assessed up to 3 months after endovascular treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Aarhus

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden
University Hospital Heidelberg
Aalborg University
Klinikum Kassel

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mads Rasmussen, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesia, Aarhus University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 16, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 16, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 10, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IDEAL BP Feasibility Study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

This is a pilot study and the data may be made available to other researchers upon request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data may be shared after publication of main study results within a period of 5 years after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

No criteria

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings